Markowitz S M, Stein K M, Lerman B B
Department of Medicine, New York Hospital-Cornell University Medical Center, New York 10021, USA.
Circulation. 1996 Dec 1;94(11):2856-64. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.11.2856.
Modification of atrioventricular (AV) conduction during atrial fibrillation (AF) may be achieved by radiofrequency ablation in the posteroseptal region of the tricuspid annulus. We tested the hypothesis that elimination of the posterior atrionodal input rather than direct damage to the compact AV node accounts for the decrease in ventricular rate after AV nodal modification.
Twenty-four patients with the typical form of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) underwent selective radiofrequency ablation of the slow AV nodal pathway in the posteroseptal tricuspid annulus. AF was induced before ablation (phase 1), 30 minutes after ablation (phase 2), and during follow-up 24 hours after ablation (phase 3), both with and without concurrent infusion of isoproterenol (4 micrograms/min). Successful elimination of AVNRT was achieved in all patients. During phase 3, 11 patients (46%) had residual dual pathway physiology. AV nodal Wenckebach cycle length (AVNW-CL) increased progressively during each phase of the protocol (356 +/- 72 versus 371 +/- 78 ms versus 432 +/- 104 ms, P < .0001), as did the effective refractory period of the AV node (279 +/- 60 versus 304 +/- 67 ms versus 372 +/- 56 ms, P < .0001). Minimal, mean, and maximal RR intervals during AF progressively increased immediately after ablation and 24 hours later (485 +/- 88 versus 533 +/- 116 ms versus 637 +/- 142 ms for mean RR, P < .0001). The changes in AVNW-CL, AV nodal effective refractory period, and ventricular response during AF were independent of residual dual pathway physiology after ablation. Similar observations were observed during isoproterenol infusion.
Modification of AV nodal conduction during AF by radiofrequency ablation in the posteroseptal tricuspid annulus is independent of the presence or absence of a residual slow AV nodal pathway. On the basis of these observations, the mechanism of AV nodal modification is consistent with elimination of the posterior atrionodal input.
在心房颤动(AF)期间,房室(AV)传导的改变可通过三尖瓣环后间隔区域的射频消融来实现。我们检验了这样一个假设,即房室结改良后心室率降低的原因是后结间输入的消除,而非致密房室结的直接损伤。
24例典型房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)患者接受了三尖瓣环后间隔区域慢房室结径路的选择性射频消融。在消融前(阶段1)、消融后30分钟(阶段2)以及消融后24小时随访期间(阶段3),分别在有和没有同时输注异丙肾上腺素(4微克/分钟)的情况下诱发AF。所有患者均成功消除了AVNRT。在阶段3,11例患者(46%)存在残余双径路生理现象。在方案的每个阶段,房室结文氏周期长度(AVNW-CL)逐渐增加(356±72毫秒对371±78毫秒对432±104毫秒,P<.0001),房室结有效不应期也如此(279±60毫秒对304±67毫秒对372±56毫秒,P<.0001)。AF期间的最小、平均和最大RR间期在消融后立即和24小时后逐渐增加(平均RR为485±88毫秒对533±116毫秒对637±142毫秒,P<.0001)。AF期间AVNW-CL、房室结有效不应期和心室反应的变化与消融后残余双径路生理现象无关。在输注异丙肾上腺素期间也观察到了类似的结果。
通过三尖瓣环后间隔区域的射频消融来改变AF期间的房室结传导,与是否存在残余慢房室结径路无关。基于这些观察结果,房室结改良的机制与后结间输入的消除一致。