• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Thrombolysis or peripheral arterial surgery: phase I results. TOPAS Investigators.

作者信息

Ouriel K, Veith F J, Sasahara A A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, NY 14642, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 1996 Jan;23(1):64-73; discussion 74-5. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(05)80036-9.

DOI:10.1016/s0741-5214(05)80036-9
PMID:8558744
Abstract

PURPOSE

Thrombolytic therapy is widely used in the treatment of peripheral arterial occlusion, but prospective, randomized comparisons with standard therapy remain few. A multicenter trial of thrombolysis or peripheral arterial surgery (TOPAS) was organized to compare critically the use of recombinant urokinase (rUK) or surgery for the initial treatment of acute lower-extremity ischemia. Phase I of the trial was designed as a dose-ranging trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of three doses of rUK in comparison with surgery.

METHODS

In a multicenter, prospective, double-blind comparison, 213 patients who had acute lower-extremity ischemia for 14 days or fewer were randomized to one of two groups. The first group received one of three dosages of rUK (catheter-directed at 2000, 4000, or 6000 IU/min for 4 hours, then 2000 IU/min to a maximum of 48 hours). The second group underwent surgery. Successful thrombolysis was followed by surgical or endovascular interventions when anatomic lesions responsible for the occlusion were unmasked. Patients were followed-up for 1 year; data were evaluated on an intent-to-treat basis.

RESULTS

The 4000 IU/min rUK dosage was chosen as the most appropriate thrombolytic regimen because it maximized lytic efficacy against the risk of bleeding. Complete (> 95%) lysis of thrombus was achieved in 71% of the 49 patients who were randomized to the 4000 IU/min group, with a mean infusion time of 23 hours. In contrast, complete lysis was achieved in 67% of patients who received 2000 IU/min and in 60% of patients who received 6000 IU/min. Hemorrhagic complications occurred in 2% of the 4000 IU/min group versus 13% of the 2000 IU/min group (p = 0.05) and 16% of the 6000 IU/min group (p = 0.03). In a comparison of the 4000 IU/min group with the surgical group, the 1-year mortality rate (14% vs 16%) or amputation-free survival rate (75% vs 65%) did not differ significantly. The frequency and magnitude of surgery in the patients randomized to rUK were decreased (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The preliminary results suggest that an initial rUK dose of 4000 IU/min is safe and efficacious in the treatment of acute lower-extremity ischemia. rUK therapy is associated with limb salvage and patient survival rates similar to those achieved with surgery, concurrent with a reduced requirement for complex surgery after thrombolytic intervention.

摘要

相似文献

1
Thrombolysis or peripheral arterial surgery: phase I results. TOPAS Investigators.
J Vasc Surg. 1996 Jan;23(1):64-73; discussion 74-5. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(05)80036-9.
2
Results of a prospective randomized trial evaluating surgery versus thrombolysis for ischemia of the lower extremity. The STILE trial.一项评估手术与溶栓治疗下肢缺血的前瞻性随机试验结果。STILE试验。
Ann Surg. 1994 Sep;220(3):251-66; discussion 266-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199409000-00003.
3
A comparison of recombinant urokinase with vascular surgery as initial treatment for acute arterial occlusion of the legs. Thrombolysis or Peripheral Arterial Surgery (TOPAS) Investigators.重组尿激酶与血管手术作为腿部急性动脉闭塞初始治疗方法的比较。溶栓或外周动脉手术(TOPAS)研究人员。
N Engl J Med. 1998 Apr 16;338(16):1105-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199804163381603.
4
Prourokinase versus urokinase for recanalization of peripheral occlusions, safety and efficacy: the PURPOSE trial.外周血管闭塞再通使用普洛激酶与尿激酶对比:安全性和有效性的PURPOSE试验
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999 Sep;10(8):1083-91. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(99)70196-x.
5
Results of a prospective, randomized trial of surgery versus thrombolysis for occluded lower extremity bypass grafts.下肢搭桥移植血管闭塞的手术与溶栓前瞻性随机试验结果。
Am J Surg. 1996 Aug;172(2):105-12. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00129-8.
6
Surgical revascularization versus thrombolysis for nonembolic lower extremity native artery occlusions: results of a prospective randomized trial. The STILE Investigators. Surgery versus Thrombolysis for Ischemia of the Lower Extremity.非栓塞性下肢自体动脉闭塞的手术血管重建与溶栓治疗:一项前瞻性随机试验的结果。STILE研究组。下肢缺血的手术治疗与溶栓治疗。
J Vasc Surg. 1996 Oct;24(4):513-21; discussion 521-3. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(96)70067-8.
7
A comparison of thrombolytic therapy with operative revascularization in the initial treatment of acute peripheral arterial ischemia.急性周围动脉缺血初始治疗中溶栓治疗与手术血管重建的比较。
J Vasc Surg. 1994 Jun;19(6):1021-30. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(94)70214-4.
8
Thrombolysis for native arterial occlusions of the lower extremities: clinical outcome and cost.下肢原发性动脉闭塞的溶栓治疗:临床疗效与成本
J Vasc Surg. 2001 Jun;33(6):1148-57. doi: 10.1067/mva.2001.114818.
9
Randomized comparison of thrombolysis and surgery. TOPAS Investigators. Thrombolysis or Peripheral Arterial Surgery.溶栓与手术的随机对照研究。TOPAS研究组。溶栓或外周动脉手术。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1995 Nov-Dec;6(6 Pt 2 Suppl):83S. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(95)71254-4.
10
When is urokinase treatment an effective sole or adjunctive treatment for acute limb ischemia secondary to native artery occlusion?对于由天然动脉闭塞继发的急性肢体缺血,尿激酶治疗何时是一种有效的单一或辅助治疗方法?
Am J Surg. 1999 Aug;178(2):103-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)00135-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment Strategies and Prognostic Outcomes in Acute Limb Ischemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Thrombolytic Therapy and Open Surgical Interventions.急性肢体缺血的治疗策略与预后结果:一项比较溶栓治疗与开放手术干预的系统评价和荟萃分析
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Apr 30;61(5):828. doi: 10.3390/medicina61050828.
2
Solitaire™ Stent Thrombectomy System in the Treatment of Acute Lower-Limb Ischemia: Comparisons in Safety and Effectiveness with Conventional Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Therapy.Solitaire™ 支架血栓切除术系统治疗急性下肢缺血:与常规导管直接溶栓治疗的安全性和有效性比较。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Sep 20;2022:6997221. doi: 10.1155/2022/6997221. eCollection 2022.
3
Clinical outcomes of surgical embolectomy versus catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute limb ischemia: a nationwide cohort study.
手术取栓与导管溶栓治疗急性肢体缺血的临床结局:一项全国性队列研究。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2022 Feb;53(2):517-522. doi: 10.1007/s11239-021-02532-1. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
4
A successful case of "temporary endoluminal bypass technique" using a guide extension catheter during thrombolysis for acute limb ischemia in the non-stenting zone.在非支架置入区域对急性肢体缺血进行溶栓治疗期间,使用导丝延长导管的“临时性腔内旁路技术”成功病例。
J Cardiol Cases. 2020 Nov 28;23(5):250-252. doi: 10.1016/j.jccase.2020.11.014. eCollection 2021 May.
5
An Acute Limb Ischemia Concomitant With a Myocardial Infarction.急性肢体缺血合并心肌梗死。
Cureus. 2021 Feb 24;13(2):e13538. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13538.
6
Combined treatment (image-guided thrombectomy and endovascular therapy with open femoral access) for acute lower limb ischemia: Clinical efficacy and outcomes.联合治疗(影像引导血栓切除术和开放式股动脉入路血管内治疗)治疗急性下肢缺血:临床疗效和结局。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 15;14(11):e0225136. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225136. eCollection 2019.
7
Mechanical rotational thrombectomy with Rotarex system augmented with drug-eluting balloon angioplasty versus stenting for the treatment of acute thrombotic and critical limb ischaemia in the femoropopliteal segment.使用配备药物洗脱球囊血管成形术的Rotarex系统进行机械旋转血栓切除术与支架置入术治疗股腘段急性血栓形成和严重肢体缺血的比较。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2019 Apr;14(2):311-319. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2018.80006. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
8
Phase 2, randomized, open-label study on catheter-directed thrombolysis with plasmin versus rtPA and placebo in acute peripheral arterial occlusion.急性外周动脉闭塞中纤溶酶与重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂及安慰剂导管定向溶栓的随机、开放标签2期研究。
J Drug Assess. 2019 Apr 9;8(1):43-54. doi: 10.1080/21556660.2019.1586402. eCollection 2019.
9
Endovascular Strategies in the Management of Acute Limb Ischemia.急性肢体缺血治疗中的血管内策略
Vasc Specialist Int. 2019 Mar;35(1):4-9. doi: 10.5758/vsi.2019.35.1.4.
10
Catheter-directed thrombolysis versus percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy in the management of acute limb ischemia: a single center review.导管定向溶栓术与经皮机械血栓切除术治疗急性肢体缺血的单中心回顾
CVIR Endovasc. 2018;1(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s42155-018-0041-1. Epub 2018 Dec 3.