Coșarcă Mircea Cătălin, Lazăr Nicolae Alexandru, Șincaru Suzana Vasilica, Bandici Bogdan Corneliu, Argatu Eduard Costin, Carașca Cosmin, Gergő Ráduly, Dorobanțu Dorin Constantin, Trâmbițaș Cristian, Mureșan Adrian Vasile
Clinic of Vascular Surgery, Mures County Emergency Hospital, 540136 Targu Mures, Romania.
Department of Anatomy, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures, 540139 Targu Mures, Romania.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Apr 30;61(5):828. doi: 10.3390/medicina61050828.
: Acute limb ischemia (ALI) is a life-threatening vascular emergency that requires immediate intervention to restore perfusion and prevent limb loss or mortality. Management strategies primarily include thrombolysis and surgical revascularization, each with distinct risks and benefits. This review evaluates and compares the outcomes of thrombolysis and surgical revascularization in ALI management, emphasizing their efficacy, safety, and patient selection criteria. : A systematic review was conducted in adherence to PRISMA guidelines, analyzing data from 15 studies, including randomized controlled trials and large retrospective analyses, encompassing over 3500 patients with varying demographics and clinical presentations. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. : Thrombolysis, utilizing agents such as urokinase or recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA), demonstrated limb salvage rates up to 90% in acute cases, with 30-day mortality rates of 4-6%. It was particularly effective in patients with embolic occlusions or short symptom durations. However, bleeding complications associated with thrombolysis were reported in up to 47% of cases. Conversely, surgical revascularization remains crucial for those with advanced ischemia or contraindications to thrombolysis, offering reliable perfusion restoration but with higher perioperative morbidity, especially in older patients with significant comorbidities. Recent advancements, including hybrid approaches combining catheter-directed thrombolysis with percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy, have shown promise in improving outcomes by reducing procedure times and enhancing clot resolution. : While thrombolysis and surgical revascularization are effective, optimizing patient selection remains a key challenge. Future research should focus on refining treatment algorithms, investigating novel thrombolytic agents, and expanding the role of minimally invasive techniques to improve long-term outcomes while mitigating complications such as bleeding and reperfusion injuries.
急性肢体缺血(ALI)是一种危及生命的血管急症,需要立即进行干预以恢复灌注并防止肢体丧失或死亡。治疗策略主要包括溶栓和外科血管重建,每种方法都有不同的风险和益处。本综述评估并比较了ALI治疗中溶栓和外科血管重建的结果,重点关注其疗效、安全性和患者选择标准。
按照PRISMA指南进行了一项系统综述,分析了15项研究的数据,包括随机对照试验和大型回顾性分析,涵盖了3500多名具有不同人口统计学特征和临床表现的患者。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估研究质量。
溶栓使用尿激酶或重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rt-PA)等药物,在急性病例中肢体挽救率高达90%,30天死亡率为4%-6%。它在栓塞性闭塞或症状持续时间短的患者中特别有效。然而,高达47%的病例报告了与溶栓相关的出血并发症。相反,外科血管重建对于那些有严重缺血或溶栓禁忌症的患者仍然至关重要,它能可靠地恢复灌注,但围手术期发病率较高,尤其是在有严重合并症的老年患者中。最近的进展,包括将导管定向溶栓与经皮机械血栓切除术相结合的混合方法,已显示出通过减少手术时间和提高血栓溶解效果来改善预后的前景。
虽然溶栓和外科血管重建是有效的,但优化患者选择仍然是一个关键挑战。未来的研究应专注于完善治疗算法、研究新型溶栓药物以及扩大微创技术的作用,以改善长期预后,同时减轻出血和再灌注损伤等并发症。