Suppr超能文献

失语症患者个性化提示与提供提示对言语标记促进作用的比较。

Comparison of personalized cueing and provided cueing on the facilitation of verbal labeling by aphasic subjects.

作者信息

Freed D B, Marshall R C, Nippold M A

机构信息

Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA.

出版信息

J Speech Hear Res. 1995 Oct;38(5):1081-90. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3805.1081.

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of two associative learning tasks on aphasic subjects' labeling of novel symbols. It was designed to determine if aphasic subjects need to develop their own associations for word-symbols pairs (personalized cueing) to obtain the long-term labeling benefits observed in prior research or if comparable results are obtained when "ready-made" associations are used during training (provided cueing). The results showed that the two cueing techniques were equal in their ability to elicit correct responses from the subjects. The results also demonstrated the long-term effectiveness of both cueing procedures on the subjects' labeling accuracy up to 30 days after training was discontinued.

摘要

本研究调查了两项联想学习任务对失语症患者新符号标记的影响。其目的是确定失语症患者是否需要为单词-符号对建立自己的联想(个性化提示),以获得先前研究中观察到的长期标记益处,或者在训练期间使用“现成的”联想(提供的提示)时是否能获得类似的结果。结果表明,两种提示技术在促使受试者做出正确反应的能力方面是相同的。结果还表明,在训练停止后长达30天的时间里,两种提示程序对受试者标记准确性都具有长期有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验