• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同注意力需求对失语症成人、右脑损伤成人或无脑部损伤成人词汇检索技能的影响。

The effects of varying attentional demands on the word retrieval skills of adults with aphasia, right hemisphere brain damage, or no brain damage.

作者信息

Murray L L

机构信息

Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.

出版信息

Brain Lang. 2000 Mar;72(1):40-72. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2281.

DOI:10.1006/brln.1999.2281
PMID:10716874
Abstract

Adults with mild aphasia, right hemisphere brain damage (RBD), or no brain damage (NBD) provided one-word phrase completions under isolation, focused attention, and divided attention conditions and in response to relatively constrained or unconstrained phrase stems. Despite comparable word retrieval accuracy among groups during the isolation condition, aphasic and RBD groups performed less accurately than the NBD group during focused and divided attention conditions. Across conditions, there were no significant differences between aphasic and RBD groups. Only aphasic subjects demonstrated a significant effect of phrase type, responding more accurately when completing constrained versus unconstrained stimuli. For aphasic and RBD groups, error type analysis indicated that semantic and phonological aspects of word retrieval were influenced by increased attentional demands. These findings suggest that for adults with aphasia or RBD, there is a negative relation between attention impairments and word retrieval abilities.

摘要

患有轻度失语症、右脑损伤(RBD)或无脑损伤(NBD)的成年人在隔离、集中注意力和分散注意力的条件下,以及对相对受限或不受限的短语词干做出反应时,完成单词短语填空。尽管在隔离条件下各群体之间的单词检索准确性相当,但在集中注意力和分散注意力条件下,失语症组和RBD组的表现不如NBD组准确。在所有条件下,失语症组和RBD组之间没有显著差异。只有失语症受试者表现出短语类型的显著影响,在完成受限刺激与不受限刺激时反应更准确。对于失语症组和RBD组,错误类型分析表明,单词检索的语义和语音方面受到注意力需求增加的影响。这些发现表明,对于患有失语症或RBD的成年人,注意力损伤与单词检索能力之间存在负相关。

相似文献

1
The effects of varying attentional demands on the word retrieval skills of adults with aphasia, right hemisphere brain damage, or no brain damage.不同注意力需求对失语症成人、右脑损伤成人或无脑部损伤成人词汇检索技能的影响。
Brain Lang. 2000 Mar;72(1):40-72. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2281.
2
Prosodic facilitation in the resolution of syntactic ambiguities in subjects with left and right hemisphere damage.左右半球损伤患者在句法歧义解决中的韵律促进作用。
Brain Lang. 2001 Aug;78(2):169-96. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2454.
3
Semantic weight and verb retrieval in aphasia.失语症中的语义权重与动词检索
Brain Lang. 2006 Jun;97(3):266-78. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.11.002. Epub 2005 Dec 15.
4
Semantic cueing effects on word retrieval in aphasic patients with lexical retrieval deficit.语义线索对词汇检索存在缺陷的失语症患者词汇检索的影响。
Brain Lang. 2001 Apr;77(1):1-9. doi: 10.1006/brln.2000.2388.
5
Attention deficits in aphasia: presence, nature, assessment, and treatment.失语症中的注意力缺陷:存在情况、性质、评估及治疗
Semin Speech Lang. 2002 May;23(2):107-16. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-24987.
6
Phonological, semantic, and mediated priming in aphasia.失语症中的语音、语义和中介启动效应
Brain Lang. 1997 Dec;60(3):347-59. doi: 10.1006/brln.1997.1829.
7
Effects of right and left hemisphere damage on performance of the "Right Hemisphere Communication Battery".左右半球损伤对“右脑交流测试组”表现的影响。
Brain Lang. 2002 Mar;80(3):510-35. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2612.
8
Right hemisphere semantic processing of visual words in an aphasic patient: an fMRI study.一名失语症患者视觉词汇的右半球语义处理:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Brain Lang. 2000 Jul;73(3):456-65. doi: 10.1006/brln.2000.2317.
9
An investigation of attention allocation deficits in aphasia.失语症中注意力分配缺陷的调查。
Brain Lang. 1993 Aug;45(2):276-96. doi: 10.1006/brln.1993.1046.
10
FMRI findings in an aphasic patient with reversed cerebral dominance for language.一名语言优势半球反转的失语症患者的功能磁共振成像(FMRI)研究结果
Acta Neurol Belg. 2008 Dec;108(4):161-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Modulating Complex Sentence Processing in Aphasia Through Attention and Semantic Networks.通过注意力和语义网络调节失语症中的复杂句子处理。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Dec 11;66(12):5011-5035. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00298. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
2
Effect of right hemispheric damage on structured spoken conversation.右侧大脑半球损伤对结构性口语对话的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 11;17(8):e0271727. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271727. eCollection 2022.
3
Assessing the benefit of acoustic beamforming for listeners with aphasia using modified psychoacoustic methods.
使用改良心理声学方法评估语音产生障碍者使用声束形成的获益。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2020 Nov;148(5):2894. doi: 10.1121/10.0002454.
4
Effects of executive attention on sentence processing in aphasia.执行性注意对失语症患者句子加工的影响。
Aphasiology. 2020;34(8):943-969. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2019.1622647. Epub 2019 May 31.
5
The neural and neurocomputational bases of recovery from post-stroke aphasia.脑卒中后失语症康复的神经和神经计算基础。
Nat Rev Neurol. 2020 Jan;16(1):43-55. doi: 10.1038/s41582-019-0282-1. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
6
Effects of Acquired Aphasia on the Recognition of Speech Under Energetic and Informational Masking Conditions.获得性失语症对在能量和信息掩蔽条件下的言语识别的影响。
Trends Hear. 2019 Jan-Dec;23:2331216519884480. doi: 10.1177/2331216519884480.
7
Sentence Processing in Aphasia: An Examination of Material-Specific and General Cognitive Factors.失语症中的句子处理:对材料特异性和一般认知因素的考察。
J Neurolinguistics. 2018 Nov;48:26-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2018.03.007. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
8
Attention in individuals with aphasia: Performance on the Conners' Continuous Performance Test - 2nd edition.失语症个体的注意力:康纳斯连续操作测验-第 2 版的表现。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2020 Mar;30(2):249-265. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2018.1460852. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
9
Hypoconnectivity of Resting-State Networks in Persons with Aphasia Compared with Healthy Age-Matched Adults.与年龄匹配的健康成年人相比,失语症患者静息态网络连接不足。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Feb 28;11:91. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00091. eCollection 2017.
10
Toward a P300 Based Brain-Computer Interface for Aphasia Rehabilitation after Stroke: Presentation of Theoretical Considerations and a Pilot Feasibility Study.迈向基于P300的脑机接口用于中风后失语症康复:理论思考与初步可行性研究介绍
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Nov 11;10:547. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00547. eCollection 2016.