Patrick D L, Deyo R A, Atlas S J, Singer D E, Chapin A, Keller R B
Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Sep 1;20(17):1899-908; discussion 1909. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199509000-00011.
This study analyzed health-related quality-of-life measures and other clinical and questionnaire data obtained from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study, a prospective cohort study of persons with low back problems.
For persons with sciatica, back pain-specific and general measures of health-related quality-of-life were compared with regard to internal consistency, construct validity, reproducibility, and responsiveness in detecting small changes over a 3-month period.
Data were collected from 427 participants with sciatica. Baseline in-person interviews were conducted with surgical and medical patients before treatment and by mail at 3 months.
Health-related quality-of-life measures included symptoms (frequency and bothersomeness of pain and sciatica) functional status and well-being (modified back pain-specific Roland scale and Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and disability (bed rest, work loss, and restricted activity days).
Internal consistency of measures was high. Reproducibility was moderate, as expected after a 3-month interval. The SF-36 bodily pain item and the modified Roland measure demonstrated the greatest amount of change and were the most highly associated with self-rated improvement. The specific and generic measures changed in the expected direction, except for general health perceptions, which declined slightly. A high correlation between clinical findings or symptoms and the modified Roland measure, SF-36, and disability days indicated a high degree of construct validity.
These measures performed well in measuring the health-related quality-of-life of patients with sciatica. The modified Roland and the physical dimension of the SF-36 were the measures most responsive to change over time, suggesting their use in prospective evaluation. Disability day measures, although valuable for assessing the societal impact of dysfunction, were less responsive to changes over this short-term follow-up of 3 months.
本研究分析了从缅因州腰椎研究中获得的与健康相关的生活质量指标以及其他临床和问卷调查数据,该研究是一项针对腰痛患者的前瞻性队列研究。
对于坐骨神经痛患者,比较了与背痛相关的特定健康相关生活质量指标和一般指标在内部一致性、结构效度、可重复性以及检测3个月内微小变化的反应性方面的情况。
收集了427名坐骨神经痛患者的数据。在治疗前对手术患者和内科患者进行了面对面的基线访谈,并在3个月时通过邮件进行随访。
与健康相关的生活质量指标包括症状(疼痛和坐骨神经痛的频率及困扰程度)、功能状态和幸福感(改良的背痛特异性罗兰量表和医学结局研究36项简短健康调查问卷(SF - 36))以及残疾情况(卧床休息、工作损失和活动受限天数)。
各项指标的内部一致性较高。如预期的那样,经过3个月的间隔,可重复性为中等。SF - 36身体疼痛项目和改良的罗兰量表显示出最大的变化量,并且与自我评定的改善程度相关性最高。除一般健康感知略有下降外,特定指标和通用指标均朝着预期方向变化。临床发现或症状与改良的罗兰量表、SF - 36以及残疾天数之间的高度相关性表明具有高度的结构效度。
这些指标在测量坐骨神经痛患者的健康相关生活质量方面表现良好。改良的罗兰量表和SF - 36的身体维度是随时间变化反应最灵敏的指标,表明它们可用于前瞻性评估。残疾天数指标虽然对于评估功能障碍的社会影响很有价值,但在这3个月的短期随访中对变化的反应较小。