Juma S
Division of Urology, University of California, San Diego, USA.
Urology. 1996 Jan;47(1):53-8. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)80382-3.
To assess the histologic changes in the prostate and the clinical outcome in men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) following transurethral fulguration of the prostate (TUFP) with the roller ball.
The study was conducted in two phases. In the first phase of the study, histologic changes in the prostate following fulguration with the roller ball were studied in 10 men with BPH who were already scheduled for transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). In the second phase of the study, 20 male patients with symptomatic BPH underwent TUFP with the roller ball. All patients had preoperative assessment with history and physical examination, urinalysis, uroflow, transrectal ultrasound of the prostate, serum prostate-specific antigen, serum hemoglobin and electrolytes, and cystoscopy. The procedure was performed under general or spinal anesthesia using standard equipment and 3-mm roller ball. The patients were seen in follow-up at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
The results of the first phase of the study indicate that the coagulating current results in thermal destruction of prostatic tissue in the form of coagulative necrosis with minimal if any vaporization. The cutting current results in tissue vaporization with minimal coagulative necrosis. Twenty men have enrolled in the second phase of the study. Their mean age is 63.2 +/- 7.5 years and their mean follow-up is 4.6 months (range, 1 to 12). Their mean American Urological Association (AUA) symptom score declined from 22.9 +/- 4.2 preoperatively to 6.4 +/- 4.9, 5.3 +/- 3.2, 4.3 +/- 1.9, 6 +/- 2.9, and 9 at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. The mean maximum flow rate (Qmax) increased from 8.9 +/- 3.4 mL/s preoperatively to 24.3 +/- 1.9 mL/s at 3 months, 22 +/- 4.4 mL/s at 6 months, 17.6 +/- 5 mL/s at 9 months, and 21 mL/s at 12 months postoperatively. The mean prostate volume was 31.9 +/- 10 mL and the mean operative time was 44.9 +/- 10 minutes. No significant changes were seen in serum hemoglobin and serum sodium. The mean hospital stay was 0.7 day (0 to 2). Nineteen patients had their catheters removed within 24 hours and 1 patient had his catheter removed 48 hours postoperatively. No patient experienced impotence, incontinence, urethral stricture, post-transurethral resection syndrome, or required blood transfusion. In 1 patient (5%) bladder neck stenosis developed at 9 months and 1 patient required TURP for residual apical adenoma at 3 months.
The nature and the degree of tissue changes in the prostate following fulguration with the roller ball are well controlled and predictable. When the cutting current is used, prostatic tissue can be removed safely and effectively. The clinical outcome after TUFP with the roller ball demonstrates significant improvement in subjective (AUA symptom score) and objective (Qmax) parameters, with reduced morbidity and short hospital stay. These early results compare favorably with those seen after TURP and laser ablation of the prostate. Larger series with longer follow-up are necessary to establish the long-term efficacy of TUFP in the treatment of BPH.
评估采用滚球经尿道前列腺电灼术(TUFP)治疗有症状的良性前列腺增生(BPH)男性患者的前列腺组织学变化及临床结局。
本研究分两个阶段进行。在研究的第一阶段,对10例已计划行前列腺经尿道切除术(TURP)的BPH男性患者进行了滚球电灼术后前列腺的组织学变化研究。在研究的第二阶段,20例有症状的BPH男性患者接受了滚球TUFP治疗。所有患者术前均进行了病史及体格检查、尿液分析、尿流率测定、经直肠前列腺超声检查、血清前列腺特异性抗原、血清血红蛋白及电解质检查以及膀胱镜检查。手术在全身麻醉或脊髓麻醉下使用标准设备及3毫米滚球进行。在术后1、3、6、9和12个月对患者进行随访。
研究第一阶段的结果表明,凝固电流导致前列腺组织以凝固性坏死的形式发生热破坏,汽化极少(若有汽化)。切割电流导致组织汽化,凝固性坏死极少。20例男性患者纳入了研究的第二阶段。他们的平均年龄为63.2±7.5岁,平均随访时间为4.6个月(范围1至12个月)。他们的美国泌尿外科学会(AUA)症状评分术前平均为22.9±4.2,术后1、3、6、9和12个月分别降至6.4±4.9、5.3±3.2、4.3±1.9、6±2.9和9。平均最大尿流率(Qmax)术前为8.9±3.4毫升/秒,术后3个月增至24.3±1.9毫升/秒,6个月为22±4.4毫升/秒,9个月为17.6±5毫升/秒,12个月为21毫升/秒。平均前列腺体积为31.9±10毫升,平均手术时间为44.9±10分钟。血清血红蛋白和血清钠未见明显变化。平均住院时间为0.7天(0至2天)。19例患者在24小时内拔除导尿管,1例患者在术后48小时拔除导尿管。无患者出现阳痿、尿失禁、尿道狭窄、经尿道切除术后综合征或需要输血。1例患者(5%)在9个月时出现膀胱颈狭窄,1例患者在3个月时因残留尖部腺瘤需要行TURP。
滚球电灼术后前列腺组织变化的性质和程度得到很好的控制且可预测。使用切割电流时,可安全有效地切除前列腺组织。滚球TUFP术后的临床结局显示主观(AUA症状评分)和客观(Qmax)参数有显著改善,发病率降低且住院时间短。这些早期结果与TURP和前列腺激光消融术后的结果相比具有优势。需要更大样本量及更长随访时间的系列研究来确立TUFP治疗BPH的长期疗效。