• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经尿道用滚球电极行前列腺电灼术。

Transurethral fulguration of the prostate with the roller ball.

作者信息

Juma S

机构信息

Division of Urology, University of California, San Diego, USA.

出版信息

Urology. 1996 Jan;47(1):53-8. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)80382-3.

DOI:10.1016/s0090-4295(99)80382-3
PMID:8560663
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the histologic changes in the prostate and the clinical outcome in men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) following transurethral fulguration of the prostate (TUFP) with the roller ball.

METHODS

The study was conducted in two phases. In the first phase of the study, histologic changes in the prostate following fulguration with the roller ball were studied in 10 men with BPH who were already scheduled for transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). In the second phase of the study, 20 male patients with symptomatic BPH underwent TUFP with the roller ball. All patients had preoperative assessment with history and physical examination, urinalysis, uroflow, transrectal ultrasound of the prostate, serum prostate-specific antigen, serum hemoglobin and electrolytes, and cystoscopy. The procedure was performed under general or spinal anesthesia using standard equipment and 3-mm roller ball. The patients were seen in follow-up at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.

RESULTS

The results of the first phase of the study indicate that the coagulating current results in thermal destruction of prostatic tissue in the form of coagulative necrosis with minimal if any vaporization. The cutting current results in tissue vaporization with minimal coagulative necrosis. Twenty men have enrolled in the second phase of the study. Their mean age is 63.2 +/- 7.5 years and their mean follow-up is 4.6 months (range, 1 to 12). Their mean American Urological Association (AUA) symptom score declined from 22.9 +/- 4.2 preoperatively to 6.4 +/- 4.9, 5.3 +/- 3.2, 4.3 +/- 1.9, 6 +/- 2.9, and 9 at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. The mean maximum flow rate (Qmax) increased from 8.9 +/- 3.4 mL/s preoperatively to 24.3 +/- 1.9 mL/s at 3 months, 22 +/- 4.4 mL/s at 6 months, 17.6 +/- 5 mL/s at 9 months, and 21 mL/s at 12 months postoperatively. The mean prostate volume was 31.9 +/- 10 mL and the mean operative time was 44.9 +/- 10 minutes. No significant changes were seen in serum hemoglobin and serum sodium. The mean hospital stay was 0.7 day (0 to 2). Nineteen patients had their catheters removed within 24 hours and 1 patient had his catheter removed 48 hours postoperatively. No patient experienced impotence, incontinence, urethral stricture, post-transurethral resection syndrome, or required blood transfusion. In 1 patient (5%) bladder neck stenosis developed at 9 months and 1 patient required TURP for residual apical adenoma at 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The nature and the degree of tissue changes in the prostate following fulguration with the roller ball are well controlled and predictable. When the cutting current is used, prostatic tissue can be removed safely and effectively. The clinical outcome after TUFP with the roller ball demonstrates significant improvement in subjective (AUA symptom score) and objective (Qmax) parameters, with reduced morbidity and short hospital stay. These early results compare favorably with those seen after TURP and laser ablation of the prostate. Larger series with longer follow-up are necessary to establish the long-term efficacy of TUFP in the treatment of BPH.

摘要

目的

评估采用滚球经尿道前列腺电灼术(TUFP)治疗有症状的良性前列腺增生(BPH)男性患者的前列腺组织学变化及临床结局。

方法

本研究分两个阶段进行。在研究的第一阶段,对10例已计划行前列腺经尿道切除术(TURP)的BPH男性患者进行了滚球电灼术后前列腺的组织学变化研究。在研究的第二阶段,20例有症状的BPH男性患者接受了滚球TUFP治疗。所有患者术前均进行了病史及体格检查、尿液分析、尿流率测定、经直肠前列腺超声检查、血清前列腺特异性抗原、血清血红蛋白及电解质检查以及膀胱镜检查。手术在全身麻醉或脊髓麻醉下使用标准设备及3毫米滚球进行。在术后1、3、6、9和12个月对患者进行随访。

结果

研究第一阶段的结果表明,凝固电流导致前列腺组织以凝固性坏死的形式发生热破坏,汽化极少(若有汽化)。切割电流导致组织汽化,凝固性坏死极少。20例男性患者纳入了研究的第二阶段。他们的平均年龄为63.2±7.5岁,平均随访时间为4.6个月(范围1至12个月)。他们的美国泌尿外科学会(AUA)症状评分术前平均为22.9±4.2,术后1、3、6、9和12个月分别降至6.4±4.9、5.3±3.2、4.3±1.9、6±2.9和9。平均最大尿流率(Qmax)术前为8.9±3.4毫升/秒,术后3个月增至24.3±1.9毫升/秒,6个月为22±4.4毫升/秒,9个月为17.6±5毫升/秒,12个月为21毫升/秒。平均前列腺体积为31.9±10毫升,平均手术时间为44.9±10分钟。血清血红蛋白和血清钠未见明显变化。平均住院时间为0.7天(0至2天)。19例患者在24小时内拔除导尿管,1例患者在术后48小时拔除导尿管。无患者出现阳痿、尿失禁、尿道狭窄、经尿道切除术后综合征或需要输血。1例患者(5%)在9个月时出现膀胱颈狭窄,1例患者在3个月时因残留尖部腺瘤需要行TURP。

结论

滚球电灼术后前列腺组织变化的性质和程度得到很好的控制且可预测。使用切割电流时,可安全有效地切除前列腺组织。滚球TUFP术后的临床结局显示主观(AUA症状评分)和客观(Qmax)参数有显著改善,发病率降低且住院时间短。这些早期结果与TURP和前列腺激光消融术后的结果相比具有优势。需要更大样本量及更长随访时间的系列研究来确立TUFP治疗BPH的长期疗效。

相似文献

1
Transurethral fulguration of the prostate with the roller ball.经尿道用滚球电极行前列腺电灼术。
Urology. 1996 Jan;47(1):53-8. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)80382-3.
2
Randomized study of transurethral resection of the prostate and combined transurethral resection and vaporization of the prostate as a therapeutic alternative in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.经尿道前列腺切除术与经尿道前列腺切除术联合汽化术治疗良性前列腺增生症男性患者的随机对照研究。
J Endourol. 2001 Apr;15(3):317-21. doi: 10.1089/089277901750161935.
3
A prospective randomized comparison of transurethral resection to visual laser ablation of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.经尿道前列腺切除术与可视化激光前列腺消融术治疗良性前列腺增生的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Urology. 1995 Aug;46(2):155-60. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)80185-x.
4
A prospective randomized study of transurethral resection of the prostate and transurethral vaporization of the prostate as a therapeutic alternative in the management of men with BPH.一项关于经尿道前列腺切除术和经尿道前列腺汽化术作为良性前列腺增生症男性患者治疗替代方案的前瞻性随机研究。
Eur Urol. 1998;34(1):15-8. doi: 10.1159/000019671.
5
A randomized prospective study of laser ablation of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.一项针对良性前列腺增生男性患者,比较前列腺激光消融术与经尿道前列腺切除术的随机前瞻性研究。
Urology. 1999 Dec;54(6):1017-21. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00319-2.
6
Is there a relationship between the amount of tissue removed at transurethral resection of the prostate and clinical improvement in benign prostatic hyperplasia.经尿道前列腺切除术中切除组织的量与良性前列腺增生的临床改善之间是否存在关联?
Eur Urol. 2001 Apr;39(4):412-7. doi: 10.1159/000052478.
7
A randomized trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate with transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of bladder outlet obstruction secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia in large glands (40 to 200 grams).一项随机试验,比较钬激光前列腺剜除术与经尿道前列腺切除术治疗大腺体(40至200克)良性前列腺增生继发膀胱出口梗阻的疗效。
J Urol. 2003 Oct;170(4 Pt 1):1270-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000086948.55973.00.
8
Transurethral prostatectomy: a prospective randomized study of conventional resection and electrovaporization in benign prostatic hyperplasia.经尿道前列腺切除术:良性前列腺增生中传统切除术与电汽化术的前瞻性随机研究。
Br J Urol. 1997 Oct;80(4):570-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1997.00428.x.
9
Randomized trial of safety and efficacy of transurethral resection of the prostate using contact laser versus electrocautery.经尿道前列腺接触激光切除术与电灼术安全性和有效性的随机试验。
Tech Urol. 1999 Dec;5(4):198-201.
10
Efficacy of transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate with respect to standard transurethral resection.经尿道前列腺电汽化术相对于标准经尿道前列腺切除术的疗效。
J Endourol. 1998 Dec;12(6):591-4. doi: 10.1089/end.1998.12.591.