• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

足月未产妇宫颈成熟时胎膜早破。12小时或24小时期待治疗的随机试验。

Premature rupture of the membranes (PROM) at term in nulliparous women with a ripe cervix. A randomized trial of 12 or 24 hours of expectant management.

作者信息

Hjertberg R, Hammarström M, Moberger B, Nordlander E, Granström L

机构信息

Department of Woman and Child Health, Karolinska Hospital/Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1996 Jan;75(1):48-53. doi: 10.3109/00016349609033283.

DOI:10.3109/00016349609033283
PMID:8560997
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes after 12 or 24 hours of expectant management in healthy nulliparous women with a ripe cervix and PROM at term.

DESIGN

A prospective, randomized study.

LOCATION

Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

SUBJECTS

Two hundred and five healthy nulliparous women with singleton pregnancies, cephalic presentation, gestational duration 36 to 42 weeks, randomized to 12 or 24 hours of expectant management after evaluation of the cervical score (> 5). If spontaneous labor did not occur, induction was performed with oxytocin after 12 or 24 hours, respectively. MAIN PARAMETERS: Maternal early morbidity and neonatal infections, obstetric intervention rate (cesarean section or instrumental delivery).

RESULTS

The cesarean section rate was 4% in each group. The vacuum extraction rate was 21% in each group. Induction of labor was performed in 47% of the women allocated to 12 hours of expectant management vs 17% of the women allocated to 24 hours of expectant management (p < 0.05). The maternal morbidity rate was almost negligible. Only a few fetal infections occurred and no difference was noted between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In healthy nulliparous women at term with a ripe cervix, expectant management over 24 hours vs 12 hours resulted in fewer inductions of labor and no increase in instrumental deliveries, without any increase in neonatal or maternal morbidity.

摘要

目的

比较足月宫颈成熟且胎膜早破的健康未产妇在期待治疗12小时或24小时后的母儿结局。

设计

一项前瞻性随机研究。

地点

瑞典斯德哥尔摩卡罗林斯卡医院。

研究对象

205名单胎妊娠、头先露、孕周36至42周的健康未产妇,在评估宫颈评分(>5分)后随机分为期待治疗12小时或24小时组。若未自然临产,则分别在12小时或24小时后用缩宫素引产。主要参数:产妇早期发病率和新生儿感染情况、产科干预率(剖宫产或器械助产)。

结果

每组剖宫产率均为4%。每组真空吸引率均为21%。分配至期待治疗12小时组的产妇中有47%引产,而分配至期待治疗24小时组的产妇中有17%引产(p<0.05)。产妇发病率几乎可忽略不计。仅发生了少数胎儿感染,两组间无差异。

结论

对于足月宫颈成熟且胎膜早破的健康未产妇,24小时期待治疗与12小时期待治疗相比,引产次数更少,器械助产未增加,且新生儿或产妇发病率未升高。

相似文献

1
Premature rupture of the membranes (PROM) at term in nulliparous women with a ripe cervix. A randomized trial of 12 or 24 hours of expectant management.足月未产妇宫颈成熟时胎膜早破。12小时或24小时期待治疗的随机试验。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1996 Jan;75(1):48-53. doi: 10.3109/00016349609033283.
2
Oxytocin vs oral misoprostol for PROM induction in nulliparas with unfavorable cervix: a randomized trial.缩宫素与口服米索前列醇用于宫颈条件不佳的初产妇胎膜早破引产:一项随机试验
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024 Aug;6(8):101414. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101414. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
3
A randomized trial of Foley Bulb for Labor Induction in Premature Rupture of Membranes in Nulliparas (FLIP).未产妇胎膜早破时使用福乐球引产的随机试验(FLIP)。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sep;217(3):360.e1-360.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.038. Epub 2017 May 4.
4
No benefit from conservative management in nulliparous women with premature rupture of the membranes (PROM) at term. A randomized study.足月未产妇胎膜早破(PROM)采取保守治疗无益处。一项随机研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1991;70(7-8):543-7. doi: 10.3109/00016349109007914.
5
A randomized controlled trial on early induction compared to expectant management of nulliparous women with prolonged latent phases.一项关于初产妇潜伏期延长时早期引产与期待治疗对比的随机对照试验。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Oct;93(10):1042-9. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12447. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
6
Prelabour rupture of the membranes at term--no advantage of delaying induction for 24 hours.足月胎膜早破——延迟引产24小时并无益处。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Aug;39(3):291-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1999.tb03399.x.
7
Induction of labour in case of premature rupture of membranes at term with an unfavourable cervix: protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing double balloon catheter (+oxytocin) and vaginal prostaglandin (RUBAPRO) treatments.足月胎膜早破且宫颈条件不佳时引产的随机对照试验研究方案:比较双球囊导管(+缩宫素)与阴道前列腺素(RUBAPRO)治疗的效果。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 20;9(6):e026090. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026090.
8
Controlled comparison of induction versus expectant care for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term.
J Perinat Med. 1996;24(3):237-42. doi: 10.1515/jpme.1996.24.3.237.
9
Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Associated with Amniotomy among Nulliparous Women Undergoing Labor Induction at Term.足月行引产的初产妇行羊膜腔穿刺术与母婴结局的相关性。
Am J Perinatol. 2021 Aug;38(S 01):e239-e248. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709464. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
10
Comparison of intravenous oxytocin and vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel in women with unripe cervixes and premature rupture of the membranes.未成熟宫颈和胎膜早破女性静脉注射缩宫素与阴道用前列腺素E2凝胶的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Sep;66(3):307-10.

引用本文的文献

1
Maternal and perinatal infectious morbidity in term prelabor rupture of membrane according to two induction of labor protocols.足月胎膜早破时两种引产方案的产妇和围产儿感染发病率。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Sep;310(3):1577-1585. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07624-w. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
2
Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more).足月(37周及以上)胎膜早破时计划早产与期待治疗(等待)的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 4;1(1):CD005302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005302.pub3.
3
Use of labour induction and risk of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
引产的使用与剖宫产风险:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
CMAJ. 2014 Jun 10;186(9):665-73. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.130925. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
4
Intravenous oxytocin alone for cervical ripening and induction of labour.单纯静脉注射缩宫素用于促宫颈成熟和引产。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7;2009(4):CD003246. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003246.pub2.