• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解生产力,这是埃及伊蚊监测的关键。

Understanding productivity, a key to Aedes aegypti surveillance.

作者信息

Tun-Lin W, Kay B H, Barnes A

机构信息

Tropical Health Program, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1995 Dec;53(6):595-601. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1995.53.595.

DOI:10.4269/ajtmh.1995.53.595
PMID:8561260
Abstract

The objective of this work was to define criteria that could be applied to achieve faster, more economical, and accurate assessment of vector populations for control of dengue viruses. During 1989-1990, 1,349 premises were surveyed in Townsville, Charters Towers and Mingela/Ravenswood, Queensland, Australia. In each locality, 1.9-8.4% of premises contained three or more containers with Aedes aegypti immature forms and were designated as key premises. Comparison of surveys in Townsville from 1989 to 1990 indicated that positive premises (i.e., those with at least one container with Ae. aegypti present) were 3.22 times more likely to remain positive than negative houses to become positive the following year. The Ae. aegypti population in Townsville was seen to be totally associated with garden receptacles, discarded household items, and trash but one well and one rainwater tank were responsible for 28% of all immature forms recorded in the 1,349 premises inspected. These breeding sites of high productivity were designated as key containers. At Charters Towers, Mingela, and Ravenswood, rainwater tanks were seen as the most important key container because although they constituted 13-29% of positive containers, they supported 60-63% of the immature forms. This study demonstrates that there is a certain degree of stability with regard to positive premises and that some of these, or some container types, contribute disproportionately to the Ae. aegypti population. Control programs could be made more efficient if efforts were concentrated on these sites of key vector productivity.

摘要

这项工作的目的是确定可用于更快、更经济且准确地评估病媒种群以控制登革病毒的标准。1989年至1990年期间,在澳大利亚昆士兰州汤斯维尔、查特斯堡以及明格拉/雷文斯伍德对1349处房屋进行了调查。在每个地区,1.9%至8.4%的房屋中有三个或更多装有埃及伊蚊幼虫形态的容器,这些房屋被指定为重点房屋。对汤斯维尔1989年至1990年调查结果的比较表明,阳性房屋(即至少有一个装有埃及伊蚊的容器的房屋)次年保持阳性的可能性是阴性房屋变为阳性可能性的3.22倍。汤斯维尔的埃及伊蚊种群被发现完全与花园容器、废弃的家居用品及垃圾有关,但一口井和一个雨水箱在1349处检查房屋中记录的所有幼虫形态中占28%。这些高繁殖力的孳生地被指定为重点容器。在查特斯堡、明格拉和雷文斯伍德,雨水箱被视为最重要的重点容器,因为尽管它们占阳性容器的13%至29%,但却容纳了60%至63%的幼虫形态。这项研究表明,阳性房屋存在一定程度的稳定性,其中一些房屋或某些容器类型对埃及伊蚊种群的贡献不成比例。如果将工作集中在这些病媒繁殖力高的地点,控制项目可能会更有效。

相似文献

1
Understanding productivity, a key to Aedes aegypti surveillance.了解生产力,这是埃及伊蚊监测的关键。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1995 Dec;53(6):595-601. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1995.53.595.
2
The Premise Condition Index: a tool for streamlining surveys of Aedes aegypti.前提条件指数:一种简化埃及伊蚊调查的工具。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1995 Dec;53(6):591-4. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1995.53.591.
3
Is routine dengue vector surveillance in central Brazil able to accurately monitor the Aedes aegypti population? Results from a pupal productivity survey.巴西中部常规登革热媒介监测能否准确监测埃及伊蚊种群?蛹生产力调查结果。
Trop Med Int Health. 2011 Sep;16(9):1143-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02818.x. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
4
Characterization and productivity profiles of Aedes aegypti (L.) breeding habitats across rural and urban landscapes in western and coastal Kenya.肯尼亚西部和沿海地区城乡景观中埃及伊蚊(L.)繁殖栖息地的特征及生产力概况
Parasit Vectors. 2017 Jul 12;10(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2271-9.
5
Epidemiological significanceof subterranean Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) breeding sites to dengue virus infection in Charters Towers, 1993.1993年,在查特斯堡,埃及伊蚊地下繁殖场所对登革病毒感染的流行病学意义。
J Med Entomol. 2002 Jan;39(1):143-5. doi: 10.1603/0022-2585-39.1.143.
6
The key breeding sites by pupal survey for dengue mosquito vectors, Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus) and Aedes albopictus (Skuse), in Guba, Cebu City, Philippines.菲律宾宿务市古巴地区埃及伊蚊(林奈)和白纹伊蚊(斯库斯)这两种登革热蚊媒通过蛹调查确定的主要繁殖场所。
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2012 Nov;43(6):1365-74.
7
Key premises, a guide to Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) surveillance and control.《关键前提:埃及伊蚊(双翅目:蚊科)监测与控制指南》
Bull Entomol Res. 2004 Jun;94(3):201-7. doi: 10.1079/ber2004297.
8
The Risk of Dengue Virus Transmission in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania during an Epidemic Period of 2014.2014年流行期间坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆登革热病毒传播风险
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Jan 26;10(1):e0004313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004313. eCollection 2016 Jan.
9
Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti in the continental United States: a vector at the cool margin of its geographic range.美国大陆的埃及伊蚊(Stegomyia aegypti):处于地理分布范围较冷边缘的病媒。
J Med Entomol. 2013 May;50(3):467-78. doi: 10.1603/me12245.
10
Aedes aegypti breeding ecology in Guerrero: cross-sectional study of mosquito breeding sites from the baseline for the Camino Verde trial in Mexico.墨西哥格雷罗州埃及伊蚊的繁殖生态:墨西哥绿道试验基线期蚊虫繁殖地的横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 30;17(Suppl 1):450. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4293-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Automatic mapping of high-risk urban areas for Aedes aegypti infestation based on building facade image analysis.基于建筑物立面图像分析的登革热媒介埃及伊蚊孳生地高危区域自动制图。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Jun 3;18(6):e0011811. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011811. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Aedes aegypti oviposition-sites choice under semi-field conditions.在半野外条件下埃及伊蚊的产卵地选择。
Med Vet Entomol. 2023 Dec;37(4):683-692. doi: 10.1111/mve.12670. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
3
A critical assessment of the detailed Aedes aegypti simulation model Skeeter Buster 2 using field experiments of indoor insecticidal control in Iquitos, Peru.
使用秘鲁伊基托斯的室内杀虫剂控制现场实验对埃及伊蚊模拟模型 Skeeter Buster 2 进行详细的批判性评估。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022 Dec 22;16(12):e0010863. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010863. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Proliferation of Aedes aegypti in urban environments mediated by the availability of key aquatic habitats.埃及伊蚊在城市环境中的繁殖受到关键水生栖息地存在的影响。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 31;10(1):12925. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69759-5.
5
Quantifying sociodemographic heterogeneities in the distribution of Aedes aegypti among California households.量化加利福尼亚家庭中埃及伊蚊分布的社会人口异质性。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Jul 21;14(7):e0008408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008408. eCollection 2020 Jul.
6
From Incriminating to Releasing : Australian Research on the Dengue Virus Vector, , and Development of Novel Strategies for Its Surveillance and Control.从定罪到释放:澳大利亚对登革热病毒媒介的研究及其监测与控制新策略的发展
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2018 Jun 22;3(3):71. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed3030071.
7
Classification of containers with Aedes aegypti pupae using a Neural Networks model.使用神经网络模型对埃及伊蚊蛹进行容器分类。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Jul 23;12(7):e0006592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006592. eCollection 2018 Jul.
8
Socio-demographic, ecological factors and dengue infection trends in Australia.澳大利亚的社会人口统计学、生态因素与登革热感染趋势
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 2;12(10):e0185551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185551. eCollection 2017.
9
The elimination of the dengue vector, Aedes aegypti, from Brisbane, Australia: The role of surveillance, larval habitat removal and policy.澳大利亚布里斯班登革热媒介埃及伊蚊的消除:监测、清除幼虫栖息地及政策的作用
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Aug 28;11(8):e0005848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005848. eCollection 2017 Aug.
10
Storm drains as larval development and adult resting sites for Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in Salvador, Brazil.巴西萨尔瓦多的雨水排放管道作为埃及伊蚊和白纹伊蚊的幼虫发育及成虫栖息场所
Parasit Vectors. 2016 Jul 27;9(1):419. doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1705-0.