• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种冠状动脉搭桥术后输血预测模型。

A model for predicting transfusion after coronary artery bypass grafting.

作者信息

Magovern J A, Sakert T, Benckart D H, Burkholder J A, Liebler G A, Magovern G J, Magovern G J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15212, USA.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Jan;61(1):27-32. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00808-X.

DOI:10.1016/0003-4975(95)00808-X
PMID:8561579
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Blood conservation has become an important issue in cardiac surgery. This study was undertaken to determine if the need of blood transfusion could be predicted from preoperative patient variables.

METHODS

From January 1, 1992, to December 31, 1993, 2,033 patients having isolated coronary artery bypass grafting procedures were studied; 1,446 (71%) were male and 587 (29%), female. The mean age was 65.1 +/- 9.9 years (range, 31 to 88 years). Emergency operation, urgent operation, and reoperations were done in 78 (4%), 188 (9%), and 189 (9%) patients, respectively. In the entire group, 1,245 (61%) received transfusion during hospitalization, and 788 (39%) did not. Logistic regression analysis was used to construct a model that predicted the need of transfusion of packed red blood cells after coronary artery bypass grafting. A transfusion risk score was constructed by assigning points to independent predictive factors on the basis of the logistic regression coefficient and the odds ratio. Preoperative predictors of transfusion were emergency operation, urgent operation, cardiogenic shock, catheterization-induced coronary occlusion, low body mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction lower than 0.30, age greater than 74 years, female sex, low red cell mass, peripheral vascular disease, insulin-dependent diabetes, creatinine level greater than 1.8 mg/dL, albumin value lower than 4 g/dL, and redo operation.

RESULTS

The mean transfusion risk score for patients receiving 0, 1 to 4, and greater than 4 units of packed red blood cells was 2.3 +/- 0.9, 5.2 +/- 3.0, and 9.6 +/- 3.5, respectively (p = 0.001). Patients with a score higher than 6 had a 95% transfusion incidence. The predictive model was validated on 422 patients having coronary artery bypass grafting from January 1 to May 31, 1994. The observed rates of the validation group fell within the 95% confidence intervals of the predicted rates.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate that readily available patient variables can predict patients at risk for transfusion. Routine use of aprotinin and other adjustments of cardiopulmonary bypass should be considered to reduce transfusion in high-risk patients.

摘要

背景

血液保护已成为心脏手术中的一个重要问题。本研究旨在确定是否可以根据术前患者变量预测输血需求。

方法

对1992年1月1日至1993年12月31日期间接受单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术的2033例患者进行了研究;其中男性1446例(71%),女性587例(29%)。平均年龄为65.1±9.9岁(范围为31至88岁)。急诊手术、限期手术和再次手术分别在78例(4%)、188例(9%)和189例(9%)患者中进行。在整个研究组中,1245例(61%)患者在住院期间接受了输血,788例(39%)未接受输血。采用逻辑回归分析构建一个模型,以预测冠状动脉旁路移植术后输注浓缩红细胞的需求。根据逻辑回归系数和比值比为独立预测因素赋予分值,构建输血风险评分。输血的术前预测因素包括急诊手术、限期手术、心源性休克、导管插入术引起的冠状动脉闭塞、低体重指数、左心室射血分数低于0.30、年龄大于74岁、女性、低红细胞量、外周血管疾病、胰岛素依赖型糖尿病、肌酐水平大于1.8mg/dL、白蛋白值低于4g/dL以及再次手术。

结果

接受0、1至4以及超过4单位浓缩红细胞的患者,其平均输血风险评分分别为2.3±0.9、5.2±3.0和9.6±3.5(p=0.001)。评分高于6的患者输血发生率为95%。该预测模型在1994年1月1日至5月31日接受冠状动脉旁路移植术的422例患者中得到验证。验证组的观察发生率落在预测发生率的95%置信区间内。

结论

这些数据表明,易于获得的患者变量可以预测有输血风险的患者。应考虑常规使用抑肽酶及对体外循环进行其他调整,以减少高危患者的输血。

相似文献

1
A model for predicting transfusion after coronary artery bypass grafting.一种冠状动脉搭桥术后输血预测模型。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Jan;61(1):27-32. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00808-X.
2
Predictors of homologous blood transfusion for patients undergoing open heart surgery.心脏直视手术患者同种异体输血的预测因素。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Feb;51(1):17-21. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-37281.
3
Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with multivessel disease.多支血管病变患者进行冠状动脉搭桥手术时体外循环使用与不使用的比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004 Jan;127(1):167-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.08.032.
4
Risk factors for red blood cell transfusion after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.冠状动脉旁路移植术后红细胞输血的危险因素。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010 Jun;24(3):413-7. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2010.01.001. Epub 2010 Mar 15.
5
Predictors of excessive blood use after coronary artery bypass grafting. A multivariate analysis.冠状动脉搭桥术后过度用血的预测因素。一项多变量分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989 Oct;98(4):492-7.
6
Acute renal failure in coronary artery bypass surgery: independent effect of cardiopulmonary bypass.冠状动脉搭桥手术中的急性肾衰竭:体外循环的独立影响
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Mar;77(3):968-72. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.09.063.
7
A model that predicts morbidity and mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.一种预测冠状动脉搭桥手术后发病率和死亡率的模型。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Nov 1;28(5):1147-53. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(96)00310-5.
8
Preoperative prediction of long-term survival after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction.左心室射血分数降低患者冠状动脉搭桥术后长期生存的术前预测
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Feb;129(2):314-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.05.022.
9
Identifying patients at risk of intraoperative and postoperative transfusion in isolated CABG: toward selective conservation strategies.识别单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术中及术后输血风险患者:迈向选择性节约策略。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Nov;78(5):1547-54. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.04.083.
10
On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: impact on postoperative renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy.体外循环与非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术:对需要肾脏替代治疗的术后肾衰竭的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Apr;77(4):1250-6. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(03)01346-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic models for prediction of perioperative allogeneic red blood cell transfusion in adult cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.预测成人心脏手术围手术期异体红细胞输血的预后模型:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Transfusion. 2025 Feb;65(2):397-409. doi: 10.1111/trf.18108. Epub 2024 Dec 26.
2
Mapping the landscape of machine learning models used for predicting transfusions in surgical procedures: a scoping review.手术中输血预测的机器学习模型应用现状图谱分析:综述研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Oct 25;24(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02729-3.
3
Preoperative low serum albumin increases the rate of perioperative blood transfusion in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty: propensity score matching.
术前低血清白蛋白增加全关节置换术患者围手术期输血率:倾向评分匹配。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Sep 2;25(1):695. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07811-5.
4
Pre-operative anaemia-does it influence post-operative outcomes after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting?术前贫血——它会影响单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术后的术后结局吗?
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Jul;40(4):410-418. doi: 10.1007/s12055-024-01746-1. Epub 2024 May 21.
5
Risk and Safety Perceptions Contribute to Transfusion Decisions in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.风险和安全感知影响冠状动脉旁路移植术的输血决策。
J Extra Corpor Technol. 2021 Dec;53(4):270-278. doi: 10.1182/ject-2100026.
6
Prediction of perioperative transfusions using an artificial neural network.使用人工神经网络预测围手术期输血。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 24;15(2):e0229450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229450. eCollection 2020.
7
The top 100 manuscripts in emergency cardiac surgery. Potential role in cardiothoracic training. A bibliometric analysis.心脏急诊手术领域的前100篇手稿。在心胸外科培训中的潜在作用。一项文献计量分析。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2019 May 14;43:5-12. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2019.05.002. eCollection 2019 Jul.
8
Evaluation of risk scores in predicting perioperative blood transfusions in adult cardiac surgery.评估风险评分在预测成人心脏手术围手术期输血中的作用。
Ann Card Anaesth. 2019 Jan-Mar;22(1):73-78. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_18_18.
9
Fish Oil and Perioperative Bleeding.鱼油与围手术期出血
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Nov;11(11):e004584. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004584.
10
Near-patient coagulation testing to predict bleeding after cardiac surgery: a cohort study.用于预测心脏手术后出血的床旁凝血检测:一项队列研究。
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2017 Jul 25;1(2):242-251. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12024. eCollection 2017 Oct.