Di Mario C, Gil R, Sunamura M, Serruys P W
Intracoronary Imaging Laboratory, Thoraxcenter, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Br Heart J. 1995 Nov;74(5):485-92. doi: 10.1136/hrt.74.5.485.
The development of quantitative angiography and the introduction of new imaging techniques cannot replace functional methods of assessing the severity of stenosis. Measurement of transstenotic pressure gradient and poststenotic flow velocity using miniaturised sensors with guidewire technology offers an alternative to the conventional non-invasive methods that is immediately applicable in the catheterisation laboratory during interventional procedures. The complexity of the coronary circulation, however, makes it difficult to establish simple cut-off criteria to identify the presence of a flow-limiting stenosis. For intermediate lesions or in the presence of variable haemodynamic conditions, the accuracy of the assessment can be improved by the application of more complex indices proposed and validated in the laboratory animals. Two of these indices are myocardial fractional flow reserve and the slope of the instantaneous relation between pressure or pressure gradient and flow velocity.
定量血管造影术的发展以及新成像技术的引入并不能取代评估狭窄严重程度的功能方法。使用带有导丝技术的小型化传感器测量跨狭窄压力梯度和狭窄后血流速度,为传统非侵入性方法提供了一种替代方案,可在介入手术期间立即应用于导管室。然而,冠状动脉循环的复杂性使得难以建立简单的截断标准来识别存在血流限制的狭窄。对于中等病变或在血流动力学条件可变的情况下,应用在实验动物中提出并验证的更复杂指标可以提高评估的准确性。其中两个指标是心肌血流储备分数以及压力或压力梯度与血流速度之间瞬时关系的斜率。