Lenton E A, Weston G A, Cooke I D
Br Med J. 1977 Mar 26;1(6064):803-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6064.803.
Basal body temperature recordings are extensively used to diagnose and treat infertility, but too great an emphasis on the interpretation of these charts might be counter-productive in managing these patients. Several gynaecologists who use temperature charts clinically were asked to score 60 charts taken from a selection of normal and infertile women, and their results were compared with those obtained by a group of non-experts. Since the full hormonal profiles had been obtained for each of the 60 charts the accuracy of the predictions could be assessed. About 80% of the temperature charts were correctly interpreted by both groups as being either ovulatory or anovulatory but the day of ovulation was predicted correctly for only about 34% of the charts. When the charts were examined retrospectively the thermal nadir was found to coincide with the luteinising hormone surge in 43% of the charts from normal subjects but in only 25% of those from the infertile patients. Predicting the day of ovulation from the temperature recording, particularly in infertile women, is clearly unjustified.
基础体温记录被广泛用于诊断和治疗不孕症,但在管理这些患者时,过于强调这些图表的解读可能会适得其反。几位临床使用体温图表的妇科医生被要求对从一组正常和不孕女性中选取的60张图表进行评分,并将他们的结果与一组非专家的结果进行比较。由于已经为这60张图表中的每一张都获取了完整的激素谱,因此可以评估预测的准确性。两组对约80%的体温图表都能正确解读为有排卵或无排卵,但只有约34%的图表能正确预测排卵日。当对图表进行回顾性检查时,发现正常受试者的图表中有43%的体温最低点与促黄体生成素高峰一致,而不孕患者的图表中只有25%是这样。从体温记录预测排卵日,尤其是在不孕女性中,显然是不合理的。