B S Hurst, K Davies, R C Milnes, T G Knowles, A Pirrie
Carolinas Medical Center, Department of Assisted Reproduction, Charlotte, NC, United States.
Independent Fertility Nurse Consultant and Coach, Castle Bytham, United Kingdom.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Mar 4;10:807139. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.807139. eCollection 2022.
Determine the accuracy of a novel technique for confirmation of the day of ovulation and prediction of ovulation in subsequent cycles for the purpose of conception using a skin-worn sensor in a population with ovulatory dysfunction. A total of 80 participants recorded consecutive overnight temperatures using a skin-worn sensor at the same time as a commercially available vaginal sensor for a total of 205 reproductive cycles. The vaginal sensor and its associated algorithm were used to determine the day of ovulation, and the ovulation results obtained using the skin-worn sensor and its associated algorithm were assessed for comparative accuracy alongside a number of other statistical techniques, with a further assessment of the same skin-derived data by means of the "three over six" rule. A number of parameters were used to divide the data into separate comparative groups, and further secondary statistical analyses were performed. The skin-worn sensor and its associated algorithm (together labeled "SWS") were 66% accurate for determining the day of ovulation (±1 day) or the absence of ovulation and 90% accurate for determining the fertile window (ovulation day ±3 days) in the total study population in comparison to the results obtained from the vaginal sensor and its associated algorithm (together labeled "VS"). SWS is a useful tool for confirming the fertile window and absence of ovulation (anovulation) in a population with ovulatory dysfunction, both known and determined by means of the timing of ovulation. The body site where the skin-worn sensor was worn (arm or wrist) did not appear to affect the accuracy. Prior diagnosis of known causes of ovulatory dysfunction appeared to affect the accuracy to a lesser extent than those cycles grouped into late ovulation and "early and normal ovulation" groups. SWS is a potentially useful tool for predicting ovulation in subsequent cycles, with greater accuracy obtained for the "normal ovulation" group.
在排卵功能障碍人群中,使用一种可穿戴于皮肤的传感器,确定一种用于确认排卵日及预测后续周期受孕排卵情况的新技术的准确性。共有80名参与者,在205个生殖周期中,同时使用可穿戴于皮肤的传感器和市售阴道传感器连续记录夜间体温。阴道传感器及其相关算法用于确定排卵日,同时将使用可穿戴于皮肤的传感器及其相关算法获得的排卵结果与其他一些统计技术进行比较,评估其准确性,并通过“六分之三”规则对相同的皮肤衍生数据进行进一步评估。使用多个参数将数据分为不同的比较组,并进行进一步的二次统计分析。与从阴道传感器及其相关算法(统称为“VS”)获得的结果相比,可穿戴于皮肤的传感器及其相关算法(统称为“SWS”)在确定排卵日(±1天)或无排卵情况方面的准确率为66%,在确定总研究人群的易受孕窗口(排卵日±3天)方面的准确率为90%。对于确认排卵功能障碍人群(已知和通过排卵时间确定)的易受孕窗口和无排卵(不排卵)情况,SWS是一种有用的工具。可穿戴于皮肤的传感器佩戴的身体部位(手臂或手腕)似乎不影响准确性。已知排卵功能障碍原因的先前诊断对准确性的影响似乎小于归类为排卵延迟和“早期及正常排卵”组的那些周期。SWS是预测后续周期排卵的一种潜在有用工具,“正常排卵”组的准确性更高。