Suppr超能文献

依托度酸和萘普生治疗膝骨关节炎患者的疗效与安全性:一项双盲、安慰剂对照研究。

Efficacy and safety of etodolac and naproxen in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

作者信息

Dore R, Ballard I, Constantine G, McDonald P

机构信息

Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 1995 Jul-Aug;17(4):656-66. doi: 10.1016/0149-2918(95)80042-5.

Abstract

A multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized, outpatient study compared the efficacy and safety of etodolac versus naproxen in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. After a washout period free of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 254 patients self-administered etodolac 400 mg (n = 86), naproxen 500 mg (n = 82), or placebo (n = 86) twice daily for 4 weeks. Compliance exceeded 90% in all three groups. Primary efficacy variables improved progressively from baseline in all three groups. The extent of improvement was greater in the etodolac and naproxen groups than in the placebo group (P < or = 0.003), except with respect to target joint tenderness (P = 0.028, etodolac vs placebo; P = 0.013, naproxen vs placebo). There were no statistical differences between active treatment groups (P > 0.1). At end point, twice as many patients responded in the etodolac (59%) and naproxen groups (51%) than in the placebo group (26%; P < or = 0.01). There were no significant between-group differences in the numbers of patients who had an adverse experience, a serious adverse experience, or an adverse experience leading to study discontinuation; there were also no significant between-group differences in the distribution of adverse experiences. There were no unexpected clinical or laboratory experiences. Etodolac 400 mg twice daily was as effective and safe as naproxen 500 mg twice daily and both were superior to placebo in the management of osteoarthritis of the knee.

摘要

一项多中心、平行组、双盲、随机的门诊研究比较了依托度酸与萘普生治疗膝骨关节炎患者的疗效和安全性。在经过一段无非甾体抗炎药的洗脱期后,254例患者自行服用依托度酸400mg(n = 86)、萘普生500mg(n = 82)或安慰剂(n = 86),每日两次,共4周。三组的依从性均超过90%。所有三组的主要疗效变量均从基线水平开始逐步改善。除了目标关节压痛方面(依托度酸与安慰剂相比,P = 0.028;萘普生与安慰剂相比,P = 0.013),依托度酸组和萘普生组的改善程度均大于安慰剂组(P≤0.003)。活性治疗组之间无统计学差异(P>0.1)。在研究终点,依托度酸组(59%)和萘普生组(51%)有反应的患者数量是安慰剂组(26%)的两倍(P≤0.01)。在有不良经历、严重不良经历或导致研究中止的不良经历的患者数量方面,组间无显著差异;在不良经历的分布方面,组间也无显著差异。没有出现意外的临床或实验室情况。每日两次服用400mg依托度酸与每日两次服用500mg萘普生的疗效和安全性相当,且二者在治疗膝骨关节炎方面均优于安慰剂。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验