Suppr超能文献

成本与收费之比:估算成本的依据有多可靠?

The ratio of costs to charges: how good a basis for estimating costs?

作者信息

Shwartz M, Young D W, Siegrist R

机构信息

School of Management, Boston University, MA 02215, USA.

出版信息

Inquiry. 1995;32(4):476-81.

PMID:8567084
Abstract

This study evaluates the accuracy of costs derived from the ratio of costs to charges (RCCs), using costs based on relative value units (RVUs) as the "gold standard." We found that RCC-calculated costs were not a good basis for determining the costs of individual patients. However, when examining average costs per diagnosis-related group (DRG), RCCs performed better. For almost 70% of the DRGs, average RCC-calculated costs were within 10% of average RVU-calculated costs. RCCs were even more reliable for comparing the relative cost of patients in a DRG in one hospital to the average cost of patients in that DRG in a group of hospitals. Charges, or an overall hospital RCC (as opposed to the departmental RCCs we used in most of our analyses), were not a good basis for determining relative hospital costs.

摘要

本研究以基于相对价值单位(RVU)的成本作为“金标准”,评估了成本与收费比率(RCC)得出的成本的准确性。我们发现,RCC计算得出的成本并非确定个体患者成本的良好依据。然而,在检查每个诊断相关组(DRG)的平均成本时,RCC的表现更好。对于近70%的DRG,RCC计算得出的平均成本在RVU计算得出的平均成本的10%以内。在比较一家医院中某个DRG患者的相对成本与一组医院中该DRG患者的平均成本时,RCC甚至更可靠。收费,或医院总体RCC(与我们在大多数分析中使用的科室RCC相对),并非确定医院相对成本的良好依据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验