Shwartz M, Young D W, Siegrist R
School of Management, Boston University, MA 02215, USA.
Inquiry. 1995;32(4):476-81.
This study evaluates the accuracy of costs derived from the ratio of costs to charges (RCCs), using costs based on relative value units (RVUs) as the "gold standard." We found that RCC-calculated costs were not a good basis for determining the costs of individual patients. However, when examining average costs per diagnosis-related group (DRG), RCCs performed better. For almost 70% of the DRGs, average RCC-calculated costs were within 10% of average RVU-calculated costs. RCCs were even more reliable for comparing the relative cost of patients in a DRG in one hospital to the average cost of patients in that DRG in a group of hospitals. Charges, or an overall hospital RCC (as opposed to the departmental RCCs we used in most of our analyses), were not a good basis for determining relative hospital costs.
本研究以基于相对价值单位(RVU)的成本作为“金标准”,评估了成本与收费比率(RCC)得出的成本的准确性。我们发现,RCC计算得出的成本并非确定个体患者成本的良好依据。然而,在检查每个诊断相关组(DRG)的平均成本时,RCC的表现更好。对于近70%的DRG,RCC计算得出的平均成本在RVU计算得出的平均成本的10%以内。在比较一家医院中某个DRG患者的相对成本与一组医院中该DRG患者的平均成本时,RCC甚至更可靠。收费,或医院总体RCC(与我们在大多数分析中使用的科室RCC相对),并非确定医院相对成本的良好依据。