Eriksson N E
Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1977;53(5):441-9. doi: 10.1159/000231782.
Case histories alone and combined with the results of skin tests and/or the radioallergosorbent test (RAST) were compared with the results of provocation tests in 397 patients with asthma or allergic rhinitis. Case histories often turned out to be doubtful. The agreement between negative histories and negative provocation tests was 77% and that between positive histories and positive provocation tests 64%. When case histories were supported by concordant skin test or RAST results, the agreement with provocation tests increased to about 90%. When a scoring system for the combinations of different diagnostic methods was employed, a 100% agreement with provocation tests was obtained for cases with high scores. It is concluded that by using the case history in conjunction with RAST and/or skin test results, a reliable diagnosis can be achieved, eliminating the necessity of provocation tests.
对397例哮喘或变应性鼻炎患者,将单纯的病历与皮肤试验和/或放射变应原吸附试验(RAST)的结果相结合,与激发试验的结果进行了比较。病历结果往往令人怀疑。阴性病历与阴性激发试验之间的一致性为77%,阳性病历与阳性激发试验之间的一致性为64%。当病历得到一致的皮肤试验或RAST结果支持时,与激发试验的一致性增加到约90%。当采用不同诊断方法组合的评分系统时,高分病例与激发试验的一致性达到100%。得出的结论是,通过结合病历与RAST和/或皮肤试验结果,可以实现可靠的诊断,从而无需进行激发试验。