Allison S C, Abraham L D
Baylor University Graduate Program in Physical Therapy, Academy of Health Sciences, Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, USA.
J Neurol. 1995 Oct;242(10):699-706. doi: 10.1007/BF00866923.
This study of plantar flexor spasticity describes relationships among a traditional qualitative spasticity scale, three potential quantitative spasticity measures and a measure of voluntary ankle muscle function. Thirty-four volunteer adult patients with traumatic brain injuries participated. There were 28 males and 6 females; the mean age was 30.3 years. A battery of five randomly sequenced tests was performed for each subject on one ankle. Tests were: modified Ashworth scale (MAS) scoring; H-reflex testing with and without Achilles tendon vibration; H-reflex testing with and without dorsiflexor contraction; reflex threshold angle and timed toe tapping (TTT). Twenty-six subjects returned to have the second ankle tested, resulting in 60 ankles for the analyses. Spearman's coefficients for correlation of quantitative spasticity measures with MAS scores ranged from 0.39 to 0.49 with associated probabilities < or = 0.002. Pearson coefficients for correlation of quantitative spasticity measures with TTT scores were lower but also significant (P < or = 0.07). Multiple correlation for the set of quantitative measures yielded R = 0.614 (P < 0.001) with MAS scores and R = 0.365 (P = 0.045) with TTT scores. These findings reveal statistically significant relationships of low to moderate strength among potential quantitative spasticity measures, a traditional qualitative spasticity scale and a simple measure of voluntary ankle muscle function. Understanding these relationships is an essential part of the ongoing search for quantitative spasticity measures.
这项关于跖屈肌痉挛的研究描述了一种传统的定性痉挛量表、三种潜在的定量痉挛测量方法与一种自主踝关节肌肉功能测量方法之间的关系。34名成年创伤性脑损伤志愿者患者参与了研究。其中男性28名,女性6名;平均年龄为30.3岁。对每位受试者的一侧踝关节进行了一组共五项随机排序的测试。测试内容包括:改良Ashworth量表(MAS)评分;在有和没有跟腱振动情况下的Hoffmann反射(H反射)测试;在有和没有背屈肌收缩情况下的H反射测试;反射阈值角度和定时足尖轻拍(TTT)。26名受试者返回接受另一侧踝关节测试,共计60个踝关节用于分析。定量痉挛测量方法与MAS评分的Spearman相关系数范围为0.39至0.49,相关概率≤0.002。定量痉挛测量方法与TTT评分的Pearson相关系数较低,但也具有显著性(P≤0.07)。这组定量测量方法与MAS评分的多重相关系数R = 0.614(P < 0.001),与TTT评分的多重相关系数R = 0.365(P = 0.045)。这些发现揭示了潜在的定量痉挛测量方法、传统的定性痉挛量表与一种简单的自主踝关节肌肉功能测量方法之间存在低至中等强度的统计学显著关系。理解这些关系是持续探索定量痉挛测量方法的重要组成部分。