Pozzi E, Masiero P, Oliva A
Clinical and Biological Sciences Department, University of Turin, Italy.
J Chemother. 1995 Aug;7(4):286-91. doi: 10.1179/joc.1995.7.4.286.
Bacterial community-acquired respiratory infections are usually sustained by strains highly responsive to antibiotic therapy. Thus, the clinical approach is based on an empirical treatment and does not require the isolation of the causative pathogen and the determination of the bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics. On the other hand, Gram-negative bacteria, most commonly multidrug resistant, frequently affect immunocompromised and nosocomial patients and their identification in cultures is absolutely necessary for proper antibacterial treatment. To this aim, two conventional methods are used, i.e. the blood culture, which is positive only in 20% of pneumonia cases, and the sputum culture, which is not invasive but easily contaminated by oropharyngeal flora. Consequently, invasive techniques for sampling the pathologic specimen, such as the BAL and the PSB, performed with the help of fiberoptic bronchoscope, are needed. The diagnostic power and the limits of both these techniques are analyzed. Moreover, the opportunity to obtain quantitative cultures, which may discriminate between contamination and infection is considered.
社区获得性细菌呼吸道感染通常由对抗生素治疗高度敏感的菌株引起。因此,临床治疗方法基于经验性治疗,无需分离致病病原体和确定细菌对抗生素的敏感性。另一方面,革兰氏阴性菌,最常见的是多重耐药菌,经常感染免疫功能低下的患者和医院内感染患者,对其进行培养鉴定对于正确的抗菌治疗绝对必要。为此,使用了两种传统方法,即血培养,仅在20%的肺炎病例中呈阳性,以及痰培养,它是非侵入性的,但容易被口咽菌群污染。因此,需要借助纤维支气管镜进行采样病理标本的侵入性技术,如支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)和防污染样本毛刷(PSB)。分析了这两种技术的诊断能力和局限性。此外,还考虑了获得定量培养物的机会,定量培养物可区分污染和感染。