Sanchez-Nieto J M, Torres A, Garcia-Cordoba F, El-Ebiary M, Carrillo A, Ruiz J, Nuñez M L, Niederman M
Servei de Pneumologia i Al.lèrgia Respiratoria, Departament de Medicina, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Feb;157(2):371-6. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.157.2.97-02039.
We performed an open, prospective, randomized clinical trial in 51 patients receiving mechanical ventilation for more than 72 h, in order to evaluate the impact of using either invasive (protected specimen brush [PSB] and bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL] via fiberoptic bronchoscopy) or noninvasive (quantitative endotracheal aspirates [QEA]) diagnostic methods on the morbidity and mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: Group A patients (n = 24) underwent QEA, PSB, and BAL; Group B patients (n = 27) underwent only QEA cultures. Empiric antibiotic treatment was given according to the attending physician and was modified according to the results of cultures and sensitivity in Group A using PSB and BAL results and in Group B based upon QEA cultures. Bacteriologic cultures were done quantitatively for EA, PSB, and BAL. Thresholds of > or = 10(5), > or = 10(3), and > or = 10(4) CFU/ml were used for QEA, PSB, and BAL, respectively. Microbial cultures from Group A patients were positive in 16 (67%) BAL samples, 14 (58%) PSB samples, and 16 (67%) QEA samples. In Group B patients, QEA microbial cultures yielded positive results in 20 of 27 (74%) samples. In Group A, there was total agreement between culture results of the three techniques on 17 (71%) occasions. In five (21%) cases, QEA coincided with either BAL or PBS. In only two (8%) cases, QEA cultures did not coincide with either PSB or BAL. No cases of positive BAL or PSB cultures had negative QEA cultures. Initial antibiotic treatment was modified in 10 (42%) patients from Group A and in four (16%) patients from Group B (p < 0.05). The observed crude mortality rate was 11 of 24 (46%) in Group A, and 7 of 27 (26%) in Group B, whereas the adjusted mortality rates (observed crude minus predicted at admission) for Groups A and B were 29 and 10%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences when comparing crude and adjusted mortality rates of Groups A and B. There were no differences in mortality between both groups when comparing pneumonia, considering together Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. (Group A, 33% versus Group B, 27%). There were no differences between Groups A and B with regard to ICU stay duration and total duration of mechanical ventilation. In this pilot study, the impact of bronchoscopy was to lead to more frequent antibiotic changes with no change in mortality. Further studies with larger population samples are warranted to confirm these findings.
我们对51例接受机械通气超过72小时的患者进行了一项开放性、前瞻性、随机临床试验,以评估采用侵入性(通过纤维支气管镜进行保护性标本刷检[PSB]和支气管肺泡灌洗[BAL])或非侵入性(定量气管内吸出物[QEA])诊断方法对呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)发病率和死亡率的影响。患者被随机分为两组:A组患者(n = 24)接受QEA、PSB和BAL检查;B组患者(n = 27)仅接受QEA培养。根据主治医生的判断给予经验性抗生素治疗,并根据A组PSB和BAL的培养结果以及B组QEA培养的结果进行调整。对EA、PSB和BAL进行定量细菌培养。QEA、PSB和BAL的阈值分别为≥10⁵、≥10³和≥10⁴CFU/ml。A组患者的微生物培养结果显示,16份(67%)BAL样本、14份(58%)PSB样本和16份(67%)QEA样本呈阳性。B组患者中,27份样本中的20份(74%)QEA微生物培养结果呈阳性。在A组中,三种技术的培养结果在17次(71%)情况下完全一致。在5次(21%)病例中,QEA与BAL或PBS结果一致。仅在2次(8%)病例中,QEA培养结果与PSB或BAL均不一致。BAL或PSB培养阳性的病例中,QEA培养均无阴性结果。A组10例(42%)患者和B组4例(16%)患者的初始抗生素治疗进行了调整(p < 0.05)。A组观察到的粗死亡率为24例中的11例(46%),B组为27例中的7例(26%),而A组和B组的调整死亡率(观察到的粗死亡率减去入院时预测的死亡率)分别为29%和10%。比较A组和B组的粗死亡率和调整死亡率时,无统计学显著差异。考虑铜绿假单胞菌和不动杆菌属时,两组肺炎患者的死亡率无差异(A组为33%,B组为27%)。A组和B组在ICU住院时间和机械通气总时长方面无差异。在这项初步研究中,支气管镜检查的影响是导致更频繁地更换抗生素,但死亡率没有变化。需要进行更大样本量的进一步研究来证实这些发现。