Suppr超能文献

社区获得性肺炎患者的诊断性纤维支气管镜检查。支气管肺泡灌洗与可伸缩堵塞导管培养的比较。

Diagnostic fiberoptic bronchoscopy in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Comparison between bronchoalveolar lavage and telescoping plugged catheter cultures.

作者信息

Jiménez P, Saldías F, Meneses M, Silva M E, Wilson M G, Otth L

机构信息

División de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia.

出版信息

Chest. 1993 Apr;103(4):1023-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.103.4.1023.

Abstract

We compared the diagnostic value of quantitative cultures of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and telescoping plugged catheter (TPC) samples in 40 patients with moderately severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). None had received antibiotics previously. BAL quantitative cultures were performed in 13 control patients without pneumonia. In 28 (70 percent) patients, TPC cultures yielded > or = 10(3) cfu/ml of a pathogenic bacterium in pure culture. In 27 of these cases and in four additional cases, BAL cultures yielded > or = 10(3) cfu/ml. BAL cultures from the control group were sterile in seven cases, yielded normal flora in three cases, and yielded microorganisms thought to be not significant in two cases. Microbiologic agreement was reached by both TPC and BAL for 32 (84 percent) of 38 microorganisms recovered. Quantitative cultures from both techniques correlated very well (r = 0.71, p < 0.0001). We conclude that both TPC and BAL have similar accuracy to determine etiologic diagnosis of CAP. There was good qualitative and quantitative agreement between both techniques.

摘要

我们比较了40例中度重症社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)和可伸缩堵塞导管(TPC)样本定量培养的诊断价值。所有患者此前均未接受过抗生素治疗。对13例无肺炎的对照患者进行了BAL定量培养。在28例(70%)患者中,TPC培养在纯培养物中产生≥10³cfu/ml的病原菌。在其中27例以及另外4例中,BAL培养产生≥10³cfu/ml。对照组的BAL培养7例无菌,3例产生正常菌群,2例产生被认为无显著意义的微生物。对于回收的38种微生物中的32种(84%),TPC和BAL达成了微生物学一致性。两种技术的定量培养相关性非常好(r = 0.71,p < 0.0001)。我们得出结论,TPC和BAL在确定CAP的病因诊断方面具有相似的准确性。两种技术在定性和定量方面都有良好的一致性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验