Nelson G J, Schmidt P C, Kelley D S
Western Human Nutrition Research Center, USDA, ARS, Presidio of San Francisco, California 94129, USA.
Lipids. 1995 Nov;30(11):969-76. doi: 10.1007/BF02536280.
In most studies reporting the effects of high-fat (HF) and low-fat (LF) diets on human plasma fatty acids (FA) and lipoprotein levels, the design involved adding to the diet an oil that had an FA composition (FAC) very different from the FAC of the control diet. Thus, it is difficult to determine if simply reducing the fat content of the diet without changing the dietary FAC changes the tissue FAC or alters plasma lipid levels. In this study, we fed diets that contained either 22 or 39% of calories from fat, but had no differences in their FAC, for 50 d to a group (n = 11) of healthy men (20-35 y). Thus, the polyunsaturated/saturated ratios (1.0) of the diets were identical as were the n-3/n-6 ratio and the monounsaturated-to-total fat ratios. The diets contained (wt% of total fat) approximately 28% saturated FA, 33% monounsaturated cis-FA, 6% monounsaturated trans-FA, 22% n-6 polyunsaturated FA, and 7% n-3 polyunsaturated FA, and 4% other minor FA. The diets consisted of natural foods and were formulated to contain 16 en% protein, either 45 or 62 en% carbohydrate (CHO) and at least the recommended daily allowance for all micronutrients. Both diets contained 360 mg of cholesterol per day. All subjects were given the HF diet for 20 d, and then six were placed on the LF and the other five remained on the HF diet for 50 d. The two groups were crossed-over for the remaining 50 d of the study. The subjects' baseline total cholesterol level was 173 mg/dl, after 50 d on the HF diet it was 177 mg/dl and after 50 d on the LF diet, 173 mg/dl. The differences were not significant, and there were no significant changes in either the LDL or HDL cholesterol levels with either diet. Triglyceride levels, and consequently very low density lipoprotein levels, rose significantly on the LF, higher CHO diet compared to the levels found in the subjects on the HF diet (91.5 and 66.4 mg/dl respectively, P < 0.002). The linoleic acid content of the plasma, platelets, and red blood cells was significantly (P < 0.05) reduced in the LF diet compared to HF diet, without any obvious physiological effects. Hence, many earlier observations indicating reductions in plasma lipid levels when people are on LF diets may be due to changes in the FAC of the diet, not the reduction in fat calories.
在大多数报告高脂(HF)和低脂(LF)饮食对人体血浆脂肪酸(FA)和脂蛋白水平影响的研究中,实验设计涉及在饮食中添加一种脂肪酸组成(FAC)与对照饮食的FAC差异很大的油。因此,很难确定在不改变饮食FAC的情况下单纯降低饮食中的脂肪含量是否会改变组织FAC或改变血浆脂质水平。在本研究中,我们给一组(n = 11)年龄在20 - 35岁的健康男性喂食脂肪热量占比分别为22%或39%但FAC无差异的饮食,持续50天。因此,两种饮食的多不饱和/饱和脂肪酸比例(1.0)相同,n - 3/n - 6比例以及单不饱和脂肪酸与总脂肪比例也相同。饮食中(占总脂肪的重量百分比)大约含有28%的饱和脂肪酸、33%的单不饱和顺式脂肪酸、6%的单不饱和反式脂肪酸、22%的n - 6多不饱和脂肪酸、7%的n - 3多不饱和脂肪酸以及4%的其他微量脂肪酸。饮食由天然食物组成,配方中含有16 en%的蛋白质、45或62 en%的碳水化合物(CHO)以及至少所有微量营养素的推荐每日摄入量。两种饮食每天都含有360毫克胆固醇。所有受试者先食用HF饮食20天,然后6人转为食用LF饮食,另外5人继续食用HF饮食50天。在研究剩余的50天里两组进行了交叉。受试者的基线总胆固醇水平为173毫克/分升,食用HF饮食50天后为177毫克/分升,食用LF饮食50天后为173毫克/分升。差异不显著,两种饮食对低密度脂蛋白(LDL)或高密度脂蛋白(HDL)胆固醇水平均无显著影响。与食用HF饮食的受试者相比,食用LF、高CHO饮食的受试者甘油三酯水平以及因此极低密度脂蛋白水平显著升高(分别为91.5和66.4毫克/分升,P < 0.002)。与HF饮食相比,LF饮食使血浆、血小板和红细胞中的亚油酸含量显著降低(P < 0.05),但没有任何明显的生理影响。因此,许多早期观察结果表明人们食用LF饮食时血浆脂质水平降低,这可能是由于饮食FAC的变化,而非脂肪热量的减少。