• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物止血的成本效益分析

Cost/benefit analysis of pharmacologic hemostasis.

作者信息

Harmon D E

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular and Transplant Anesthesia, Alton Ochsner Clinic, New Orleans, Louisiana 70121, USA.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Feb;61(2 Suppl):S21-5; discussion S33-4. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)01079-3.

DOI:10.1016/0003-4975(95)01079-3
PMID:8572828
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical bleeding with possible associated coagulopathies is a major source of morbidity and mortality. More than 27% of patients receive unnecessary blood or blood-product transfusions during cardiac operations. Analysis of the cost-benefit of pharmacologic hemostasis can be accomplished by relating all the components of cost, which include both direct and indirect costs to both direct and indirect benefits to the patient.

METHODS

A significant reduction in transfusion requirements can be achieved by the systematic application of a clinical algorithm. An alternative is to use drugs that enhance hemostasis. Four such drugs commonly used are desmopressin acetate, tranexamic acid, epsilon-aminocaproic acid, and aprotinin. All these agents have been shown to successfully reduce bleeding and the need for transfusion. It appears that the order of efficacy (greatest to least) is aprotinin, tranexamic acid, epsilon-aminocaproic acid, and desmopressin acetate.

RESULTS

Cost/benefit analysis associated with the use of these agents is complex. The direct costs of these drug treatments can be balanced against the costs related to blood and blood-product administration. Using epsilon-aminocaproic acid, blood used is valued at $30, whereas the drug treatment cost is less than $2. Aprotinin use results in costs of more than $500, with the drug costing $900.

CONCLUSIONS

Improved hemostasis should also result in indirect cost savings from reduced operating room time, reduced intensive care unit and hospital stay, and the avoidance of reoperation for bleeding.

摘要

背景

手术出血及可能伴发的凝血功能障碍是发病和死亡的主要原因。超过27%的患者在心脏手术期间接受了不必要的血液或血液制品输血。通过关联成本的所有组成部分(包括直接成本和间接成本)与患者的直接和间接收益,可以完成药物止血的成本效益分析。

方法

通过系统应用临床算法可显著减少输血需求。另一种方法是使用增强止血的药物。常用的四种此类药物是醋酸去氨加压素、氨甲环酸、ε-氨基己酸和抑肽酶。所有这些药物均已证明能成功减少出血和输血需求。疗效顺序(从高到低)似乎是抑肽酶、氨甲环酸、ε-氨基己酸和醋酸去氨加压素。

结果

与使用这些药物相关的成本效益分析很复杂。这些药物治疗的直接成本可与血液和血液制品管理相关的成本相平衡。使用ε-氨基己酸时,所使用血液的价值为30美元,而药物治疗成本不到2美元。使用抑肽酶的成本超过500美元,药物成本为900美元。

结论

改善止血还应通过减少手术室时间、缩短重症监护病房和住院时间以及避免因出血再次手术来实现间接成本节约。

相似文献

1
Cost/benefit analysis of pharmacologic hemostasis.药物止血的成本效益分析
Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Feb;61(2 Suppl):S21-5; discussion S33-4. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)01079-3.
2
Cost-benefit and efficacy of aprotinin compared with epsilon-aminocaproic acid in patients having repeated cardiac operations: a randomized, blinded clinical trial.在接受再次心脏手术的患者中,抑肽酶与氨甲环酸相比的成本效益和疗效:一项随机、盲法临床试验。
Anesthesiology. 1997 Dec;87(6):1373-80. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199712000-00017.
3
Drugs to minimize perioperative blood loss in cardiac surgery: meta-analyses using perioperative blood transfusion as the outcome. The International Study of Peri-operative Transfusion (ISPOT) Investigators.心脏手术中减少围手术期失血的药物:以围手术期输血为结果的荟萃分析。围手术期输血国际研究(ISPOT)调查人员。
Anesth Analg. 1997 Dec;85(6):1258-67. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199712000-00014.
4
Hemostatic effects of aprotinin, tranexamic acid and epsilon-aminocaproic acid in primary cardiac surgery.抑肽酶、氨甲环酸和ε-氨基己酸在心脏直视手术中的止血作用
Ann Thorac Surg. 1999 Dec;68(6):2252-6; discussion 2256-7. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00866-8.
5
The safety of aprotinin and lysine-derived antifibrinolytic drugs in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis.抑肽酶和赖氨酸衍生的抗纤溶药物在心脏手术中的安全性:一项荟萃分析。
CMAJ. 2009 Jan 20;180(2):183-93. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.081109. Epub 2008 Dec 2.
6
Changes in coagulation patterns, blood loss and blood use after cardiopulmonary bypass: aprotinin vs tranexamic acid vs epsilon aminocaproic acid.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1996 Aug;37(4):401-7.
7
Tranexamic acid and aprotinin in primary cardiac operations: an analysis of 220 cardiac surgical patients treated with tranexamic acid or aprotinin.氨甲环酸与抑肽酶在心脏初次手术中的应用:对220例接受氨甲环酸或抑肽酶治疗的心脏手术患者的分析
Anesth Analg. 2008 Nov;107(5):1469-78. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318182252b.
8
Natural and synthetic antifibrinolytics in adult cardiac surgery: efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency.成人心脏手术中天然和合成抗纤溶药物:疗效、有效性和效率
Can J Anaesth. 1994 Nov;41(11):1104-12. doi: 10.1007/BF03015662.
9
A model of the direct and indirect effects of aprotinin administration on the overall costs of coronary revascularization surgery in a university teaching hospital cardiothoracic unit.抑肽酶给药对某大学教学医院心胸外科单元冠状动脉血运重建手术总成本的直接和间接影响模型。
Clin Ther. 2002 Oct;24(10):1677-89. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(02)80071-6.
10
Comparison of blood-conservation strategies in cardiac surgery patients at high risk for bleeding.心脏手术中出血高危患者血液保护策略的比较
Anesthesiology. 2000 Mar;92(3):674-82. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200003000-00010.

引用本文的文献

1
Health and Economic Advantages Associated With the Use of TachoSil: An Update of Systematic Review.使用速即纱的健康与经济优势:系统评价更新
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2025 Mar 1;21:257-271. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S476650. eCollection 2025.
2
Economic and outcomes consequences of TachoSil®: a systematic review.速即纱®的经济影响及结果:一项系统评价
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2014 Sep 10;10:569-75. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S63199. eCollection 2014.
3
Clinical benefits and risk analysis of topical hemostats: a review.局部止血剂的临床益处与风险分析:综述
J Artif Organs. 2005;8(3):137-42. doi: 10.1007/s10047-005-0296-x.
4
Tranexamic acid: a review of its use in surgery and other indications.氨甲环酸:其在手术及其他适应症中的应用综述
Drugs. 1999 Jun;57(6):1005-32. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199957060-00017.