Fichtner H J
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1977 Apr;115(2):243-8.
For more than 100 years in different sectors the attempt has been made to define rehabilitation and to make it significant in the practice of rehabilitation. If you watch especially the past 70 years in Germany, then the legislature concerning the protection of health, the provident measures, the case of invalidity is so progressive and from year to year becoming more extensive, that there is actually always an area, in which there is a legal way to help the disabled. Nevertheless there are always gaps within a measure of rehabilitation which are necessary to be filled in common efforts. In the Federal Republic of Germany there is a legal clain of rehabilitative measures in a comprehensive way indeed, in which we think of the necessity of a federal rehabilitation law, since certain methods in the arrangement and exhausting of previous legislature for the disabled is often too difficult. In spite of best legal conditions, however, it has to be considered, and the dynamics in the accomplishment not only of the particular functions, but also of the special aims always will be significant for the understanding of a society. Legal claim of integration should therefore never be in doubt.
100多年来，不同领域一直在尝试定义康复，并使其在康复实践中具有重要意义。特别是观察德国过去70年的情况，有关健康保护、预防措施、残疾情况的立法是如此进步，且逐年变得更加广泛，以至于实际上总是存在一个领域，在这个领域中有合法途径帮助残疾人。然而，康复措施中总是存在一些需要共同努力填补的空白。在德意志联邦共和国，确实全面存在康复措施的法律要求，鉴于以往针对残疾人立法的安排和详尽实施中的某些方法往往过于困难，我们认为有必要制定一部联邦康复法。然而，尽管有最好的法律条件，但必须认识到，不仅特定功能的实现动态，而且特殊目标的实现动态，对于理解一个社会始终具有重要意义。因此，融合的法律要求绝不应受到质疑。
