Suppr超能文献

侵入性产前检查:是否需要进行“备用”组织取样?

Invasive prenatal procedures: is 'backup' tissue sampling indicated?

作者信息

Meagher S, Smith A, Milligan J

机构信息

Department of Cytogenetics, Children's Hospital, King George V Hospital for Mothers and Babies, Camperdown, N.S.W., Australia.

出版信息

Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1995;40(2):94-6. doi: 10.1159/000292313.

Abstract

Prenatal karyotyping was performed on 136 patients because of one or more abnormalities detected on ultrasound. A total of 188 specimens was obtained which included fetal blood, amniotic fluid and chorionic villus. In 52 patients a second or 'backup' sample was obtained and in 100% cytogenetic analysis was successful. In contrast, failure to obtain a result occurred in 4 (4.7%) of the remaining 84 patients where a second sample was not obtained. In the event of primary sample failure, backup sampling not only improves the karyotype yield, but obviates the need for a second pass procedure with its attendant risks.

摘要

由于超声检查发现一项或多项异常,对136例患者进行了产前核型分析。共获取了188份标本,包括胎儿血液、羊水和绒毛。52例患者获取了第二份或“备用”样本,其中100%的细胞遗传学分析获得成功。相比之下,其余84例未获取第二份样本的患者中有4例(4.7%)未能得到结果。如果初次样本检测失败,备用样本采集不仅能提高核型分析的成功率,还能避免二次操作及其伴随的风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验