Egilman D S, Reinert A A
South Shore Health Services, Braintree, MA 02184, USA.
Int J Health Serv. 1995;25(4):667-96. doi: 10.2190/EXVJ-RR1P-AYCG-1WH6.
Several recent articles have critiqued the process employed by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists in determining Threshold Limit Values. Criticisms have included inadequate data collection, inadequate research, excessive corporate influence, and slow response to informational changes. In this article, the authors address the historical development of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists' asbestos exposure guideline. They demonstrate that the proposed guideline was known to be inadequate when it was first proposed, was severely criticized between 1946 and 1968, but nonetheless was promulgated annually and remained unchanged 1971.
最近有几篇文章批评了美国政府工业卫生学家会议在确定阈限值时所采用的过程。批评意见包括数据收集不足、研究不充分、企业影响过大以及对信息变化反应迟缓。在本文中,作者阐述了美国政府工业卫生学家会议石棉暴露指南的历史发展。他们表明,该提议的指南在首次提出时就被认为是不充分的,在1946年至1968年间受到了严厉批评,但尽管如此,它仍每年发布,并且在1971年之前一直保持不变。