Minciacchi D, Granato A, Antonini A, Tassinari G, Santarelli M, Zanolli L, Macchi G
Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Sciences, University of Florence, Italy.
J Comp Neurol. 1995 Nov 6;362(1):46-70. doi: 10.1002/cne.903620104.
Projections from the claustrum (Cl) and the thalamic anterior intralaminar nuclei (AIN) to different representations within the primary somatosensory (S1) and visual (V1) areas were studied using the multiple retrograde fluorescent tracing technique. The injected cortical regions were identified electrophysiologically. Retrograde labeling in Cl reveals two different projection patterns. The first pattern is characterized by a clear topographic organization and is composed of two parts. The somatosensory Cl shows a dorsoventral progression of cells projecting to the hindpaw, forepaw, and face representations of S1. The visual Cl has cells projecting to the vertical meridian representation of V1 surrounded dorsally by neurons projecting to the representation of retinal periphery. A second pattern of Cl projections is composed of neurons that are distributed diffusely through the nucleus. In both somatosensory and visual sectors, these intermingle with the topographically projecting cells. Neurons retrogradely labeled from cortical injections are always present in the AIN. In the central medial nucleus, the segregation of modality is evident: The visual-projecting sector is dorsal, and the somatosensory is ventral. Projections from the central lateral nucleus display detectable somatotopic and retinotopic organization: Individual regions are preferentially connected with specific representations of S1 or V1. In the paracentral nucleus, no clear regional preferences are detectable. Also performed were comparisons of the proportions of neurons projecting to different sensory representations. Projections to V1 from both AIN and Cl are biased towards the retinal periphery representation. S1 projection preference is for the forepaw representation in Cl and for the hindpaw in the AIN. The quantitative analysis of multiply labeled cells reveals that, compared to Cl, the AIN contains a higher proportion of neurons branching between different representations of S1 or V1. The concept of topographic vs. diffuse projecting systems is reviewed and discussed, and functional implications of quantitative analysis are considered.
运用多重逆行荧光追踪技术,研究了屏状核(Cl)和丘脑前内侧核(AIN)向初级体感区(S1)和视觉区(V1)内不同表征区域的投射。通过电生理方法确定注射的皮质区域。Cl中的逆行标记显示出两种不同的投射模式。第一种模式的特征是具有清晰的拓扑组织,由两部分组成。体感Cl区显示出向S1区后爪、前爪和面部表征区域投射的细胞呈背腹向排列。视觉Cl区有细胞投射到V1区的垂直子午线表征区域,其背侧被投射到视网膜周边表征区域的神经元所包围。Cl投射的第二种模式由分散分布于该核内的神经元组成。在体感和视觉区域,这些神经元与拓扑投射细胞相互交织。从皮质注射部位逆行标记的神经元总是存在于AIN中。在中央内侧核中,模态分离很明显:视觉投射区在背侧,体感投射区在腹侧。中央外侧核的投射显示出可检测到的躯体定位和视网膜定位组织:各个区域优先与S1或V1的特定表征区域相连。在中央旁核中,未检测到明显的区域偏好。还对投射到不同感觉表征区域的神经元比例进行了比较。AIN和Cl向V1的投射都偏向于视网膜周边表征区域。Cl向S1的投射偏好前爪表征区域,而AIN向S1的投射偏好后爪表征区域。对多重标记细胞的定量分析表明,与Cl相比,AIN中在S1或V1不同表征区域之间分支的神经元比例更高。本文回顾并讨论了拓扑投射系统与弥散投射系统的概念,并考虑了定量分析的功能意义。