Johnson M E, Jones G, Brems C
Department of Psychology, University of Alaska, Anchorage 99508, USA.
J Pers Assess. 1996 Feb;66(1):153-68. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_12.
Since the development of the revised Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2; Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham, Tellege, & Kaemmer, 1989), no independent studies have been conducted to validate the new GF and GM scales, the only published study being based on the original standardization sample. To determine the concurrent validity of these scales, our study correlated GF and GM with scores obtained from the Bem Sex-Role Inventory, the Sex Role Behavior Scale, and the Sex Role Identity Scale. Because the sex-role literature has suggested numerous personality correlates of masculinity and femininity, the 16-PF was included to assess this dimension of the new scales, as well as measures of social desirability. Results revealed the GF and GM scales to have low internal consistency and low concurrent validity with established sex-role measures. Relative to construct validity, their patterns of correlation with personality measures suggest that GF and GM are more related to personality traits of interpersonal potency and sensitivity, respectively, than to masculinity and femininity. Overall, although the data yielded by these new scales provide additional information over Scale 5, they do not appear to hold as much promise as hoped for.
自修订版明尼苏达多相人格量表（MMPI - 2；布彻、达尔斯特伦、格雷厄姆、泰勒格和凯默，1989年）问世以来，尚未有独立研究对新的GF和GM量表进行验证，唯一已发表的研究是基于原始标准化样本。为了确定这些量表的同时效度，我们的研究将GF和GM与从贝姆性别角色量表、性别角色行为量表和性别角色认同量表获得的分数进行了关联。由于性别角色文献提出了众多与男性气质和女性气质相关的人格关联因素，因此纳入了16种人格因素问卷来评估新量表的这一维度，以及社会赞许性量表。结果显示，GF和GM量表的内部一致性较低，与既定的性别角色测量方法的同时效度也较低。相对于结构效度，它们与人格测量方法的相关模式表明，GF和GM分别与人际效能和敏感性的人格特质更为相关，而非与男性气质和女性气质相关。总体而言，尽管这些新量表产生的数据比量表5提供了更多信息，但它们似乎并没有如预期那样有很大前景。
