Suppr超能文献

光疗法治疗季节性情感障碍的疗程影响:一周与两周的疗效对比

Influence of phototherapy treatment duration for seasonal affective disorder: outcome at one vs. two weeks.

作者信息

Labbate L A, Lafer B, Thibault A, Rosenbaum J F, Sachs G S

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC 20307, USA.

出版信息

Biol Psychiatry. 1995 Dec 1;38(11):747-50. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(95)00069-0.

Abstract

Most previous phototherapy research has been conducted on trials of 1 week duration. This study compares response to phototherapy at weeks 1 and 2. All subjects (n = 26) were between 18 and 65 years and met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd ed, revised, (DSM III-R) criteria for major depression, recurrent, seasonal pattern and had a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score (HAM-D) > or = 20. A rater blinded to treatment schedule and study hypothesis repeated the HAM-D-31 1 and 2 weeks after baseline to assess treatment response to bright light. Response rates at week 1 defined by 50% reduction in HAM-D-31 and HAM-D-31 score < 8 were 62% and 27%, respectively. At week 2, however, 65% had a 50% reduction in HAM-D-31 and 62% had a HAM-D-31 < score 8 (chi-square = 6, p = 0.01). Four patients (15%) who were nonresponders at week 1 responded after 2 weeks. The results show a statistically different outcome after 2 weeks of treatment and suggest the necessity of longer trials of phototherapy.

摘要

以往大多数光疗研究都是为期1周的试验。本研究比较了第1周和第2周光疗的反应。所有受试者(n = 26)年龄在18至65岁之间,符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第3版修订版(DSM III-R)中复发性季节性重度抑郁症的标准,且汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分(HAM-D)≥20。一名对治疗方案和研究假设不知情的评估者在基线后1周和2周重复进行HAM-D-31评估,以评估对强光治疗的反应。以HAM-D-31降低50%且HAM-D-31评分<8定义的第1周反应率分别为62%和27%。然而,在第2周,65%的患者HAM-D-31降低了50%,62%的患者HAM-D-31评分<8(卡方=6,p = 0.01)。4名在第1周无反应的患者(15%)在2周后有反应。结果显示治疗2周后有统计学差异的结果,并表明有必要进行更长时间的光疗试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验