Buszman P, Szafranek A, Kalarus Z, Gasior M
Silesian Center of Cardiology, Zabrze, Poland.
Eur Heart J. 1995 Sep;16(9):1207-14. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a061077.
The role of the ECG in evaluating reperfusion status after thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction is not clear. Dramatic ST segment changes have been observed during recanalization of an infarct-related artery, but ST criteria have not been definitively established for prediction of coronary artery patency. Differences in ST segment changes in relation to infarct localization have not been evaluated, and further investigation is required into reciprocal ST depression, which provides information independent from ST elevation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate how early changes in ST segment elevations and depressions predict vessel patency after fibrinolysis for patients with anterior and inferior/lateral infarcts.
Two hundred patients with a Pardee wave in the ECG and chest pain of less than 6 h duration were given thrombolytic treatment. The result of the therapy was assessed simultaneously with coronary angiography. Patients were divided into two groups: I (50 patients) without recanalization (TIMI grade 0, 1 or 2), and II (150 patients) with successful recanalization (TIMI grade 3). Before and after therapy, analysis of the 12 lead ECG included maximum ST elevation measurement (H1, H2 respectively), the sum of ST elevations (sigma H1, sigma H2), the sum of ST segment depressions (sigma h1, sigma h2), and the ratios of ST segment changes (R1 = H2:H1, R2 = sigma H2:sigma H1, R3 = sigma h2:sigma h1). The mean interval from the first to the second ECG was 3.5 +/- 1 h. Successive values of R1 and R2 were examined to find that which best distinguished between the two groups. The best values for prediction of reperfusion were: (1) For anterior wall infarct [table: see text] (2) For inferior and lateral infarct [table: see text] In 13 patients with a complete right or left bundle branch block in the first or second ECG, the result of treatment was predicted in 11 patients using criteria for factor R1 and in 12 patients using criteria for R2. Analysis of ST segment depressions revealed a significant correlation between normalization of ST segment depressions and elevations (R3 vs R1: r = 0.60, P < 0.05; R3 vs R2 r = 0.59, P < 0.05). Multivariate discriminant analysis showed an independent value of R3 for discrimination between the two groups, but only in patients with inferior/lateral infarcts. The overall accuracy of the common algorithm in predicting reperfusion was significantly better in patients with inferior/lateral infarcts (Chi2 test, P = 0.0078). When separate algorithms were used, there was no significant difference between patients with anterior or inferior/lateral infarcts because of the significant improvement in prediction of reperfusion in patients with anterior infarcts (McNemar's test: P = 0.041).
We conclude that analysis of ST segments on the standard 12-lead ECG offers valuable help in the early identification of successful recanalization of infarct-related arteries after thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Use of the ratio of ST segment normalization according to the separate criteria for anterior and inferior/lateral infarcts gives the test a high sensitivity and specificity, even in the presence of interventricular conduction disturbances.
心电图在评估急性心肌梗死溶栓治疗后再灌注状态中的作用尚不清楚。在梗死相关动脉再通期间观察到显著的ST段变化,但尚未明确确立用于预测冠状动脉通畅的ST标准。尚未评估与梗死定位相关的ST段变化差异,并且需要对提供独立于ST段抬高信息的ST段压低进行进一步研究。因此,本研究的目的是评估ST段抬高和压低的早期变化如何预测前壁梗死和下壁/侧壁梗死患者溶栓治疗后的血管通畅情况。
200例心电图出现Pardee波且胸痛持续时间小于6小时的患者接受了溶栓治疗。同时通过冠状动脉造影评估治疗结果。患者分为两组:I组(50例)未再通(TIMI分级0、1或2级),II组(150例)成功再通(TIMI分级3级)。治疗前后,对12导联心电图的分析包括最大ST段抬高测量值(分别为H1、H2)、ST段抬高总和(σH1、σH2)、ST段压低总和(σh1、σh2)以及ST段变化比值(R1 = H2:H1、R2 = σH2:σH1、R3 = σh2:σh1)。从第一次心电图到第二次心电图的平均间隔时间为3.5±1小时。检查R1和R2的连续值以找出最能区分两组的指标。预测再灌注的最佳值为:(1)对于前壁梗死[表格:见原文](2)对于下壁和侧壁梗死[表格:见原文]在13例首次或第二次心电图出现完全性右束支或左束支传导阻滞的患者中,使用因子R1标准预测11例患者的治疗结果,使用R2标准预测12例患者的治疗结果。对ST段压低的分析显示ST段压低与抬高的正常化之间存在显著相关性(R3与R1:r = 0.60,P < 0.05;R3与R2:r = 0.59,P < 0.05)。多变量判别分析显示R3在区分两组方面具有独立价值,但仅在有下壁/侧壁梗死的患者中如此。通用算法预测再灌注的总体准确性在有下壁/侧壁梗死的患者中显著更高(卡方检验,P = 0.0078)。当使用单独算法时,前壁梗死或下壁/侧壁梗死患者之间无显著差异,因为前壁梗死患者再灌注预测有显著改善(McNemar检验:P = 0.041)。
我们得出结论,对标准12导联心电图上的ST段进行分析,为急性心肌梗死患者溶栓治疗后早期识别梗死相关动脉成功再通提供了有价值的帮助。根据前壁和下壁/侧壁梗死的单独标准使用ST段正常化比值,即使在存在室内传导障碍的情况下,该检测也具有高敏感性和特异性。