• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparison of hemodynamic changes resulting from toxic shock syndrome toxin-1-producing Staphylococcus aureus sepsis and endotoxin-producing gram-negative rod sepsis in patients with severe burns.

作者信息

Tanaka H, Mituo T, Yukioka T, Matsuda H, Shimazaki S, Igarashi H

机构信息

Department of Traumatology and Critical Care Medicine, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Mitaka City, Japan.

出版信息

J Burn Care Rehabil. 1995 Nov-Dec;16(6):616-21. doi: 10.1097/00004630-199511000-00011.

DOI:10.1097/00004630-199511000-00011
PMID:8582941
Abstract

Five patients with burns and toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (TSST-1)-producing Staphylococcus aureus sepsis (TSS group) were treated in a 5-year period at Kyorin University Hospital's Traumatology and Critical Care Center Burn Unit. Hemodynamic and metabolic differences in these patients were compared retrospectively with those in another five patients who were matched by burn index and age and in whom endotoxin-producing gram-negative rod sepsis developed (End group). Both groups showed hypermetabolic and hyperdynamic changes at the point sepsis developed. There were no significant differences between the two groups in any parameter. At the point septic shock developed, the TSS group showed significantly lower mean (+/- SD) arterial pressure (TSS vs End group, 64 +/- 5 vs 74 +/- 5 mm Hg; p < 0.05), significantly lower systemic vascular resistance index (TSS vs End group, 579 +/- 62 vs 729 +/- 75 dynes.sec.cm-5/m2; p < 0.05), and higher oxygen consumption (TSS vs End group, 190 +/- 7 vs 163 +/- 11 L/min/m2; p < 0.05) compared with the End group. This is the first clinical report that asserts that TSST-1-producing gram-positive sepsis may result in more hypermetabolic and hyperdynamic differences than does endotoxin-producing gram-negative rod septic shock. These responses may indicate a stronger stimulation of cytokine and nitrous oxide synthetic activity by TSST-1 than by endotoxin.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparison of hemodynamic changes resulting from toxic shock syndrome toxin-1-producing Staphylococcus aureus sepsis and endotoxin-producing gram-negative rod sepsis in patients with severe burns.
J Burn Care Rehabil. 1995 Nov-Dec;16(6):616-21. doi: 10.1097/00004630-199511000-00011.
2
[MRSA infection and toxic shock syndrome in burn patients].[烧伤患者的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染与中毒性休克综合征]
Nihon Rinsho. 1992 May;50(5):1104-11.
3
Gram-negative endotoxins and staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome.革兰氏阴性菌内毒素与葡萄球菌中毒性休克综合征。
Prog Clin Biol Res. 1985;189:419-32.
4
Patterns of Staphylococcus aureus colonization, toxin production, immunity and illness in burned children.烧伤儿童金黄色葡萄球菌定植、毒素产生、免疫及疾病模式
Burns. 1994 Dec;20(6):514-21. doi: 10.1016/0305-4179(94)90011-6.
5
Endotoxin is not an essential mediator in toxic shock syndrome.
Rev Infect Dis. 1989 Jan-Feb;11 Suppl 1:S219-28; discussion S228-30. doi: 10.1093/clinids/11.supplement_1.s219.
6
Prevalence of antibody to toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 in burn patients.烧伤患者中毒性休克综合征毒素-1抗体的患病率。
Ann Lab Med. 2015 Jan;35(1):89-93. doi: 10.3343/alm.2015.35.1.89. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
7
Toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (TSST-1) antibody levels in Japanese children.日本儿童中毒性休克综合征毒素-1(TSST-1)抗体水平。
Burns. 2010 Aug;36(5):716-21. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2009.10.004. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
8
Low Level of TSST-1 Antibody in Burn Patients With Toxic Shock Syndrome Caused by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌引起中毒性休克综合征的烧伤患者中TSST-1抗体水平较低
J Burn Care Res. 2015 May-Jun;36(3):e120-4. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000128.
9
Risk of developing toxic shock syndrome associated with toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 following nongenital staphylococcal infection.非生殖器葡萄球菌感染后发生与中毒性休克综合征毒素1相关的中毒性休克综合征的风险。
Rev Infect Dis. 1989 Jan-Feb;11 Suppl 1:S8-13. doi: 10.1093/clinids/11.supplement_1.s8.
10
[Lethal, non-menstrual toxic shock syndrome associated with Staphylococcus aureus sepsis].[与金黄色葡萄球菌败血症相关的致死性、非月经性中毒性休克综合征]
Anaesthesist. 1995 Dec;44(12):869-74. doi: 10.1007/s001010050224.

引用本文的文献

1
Late multiple organ surge in interferon-regulated target genes characterizes staphylococcal enterotoxin B lethality.干扰素调节靶基因的晚期多器官激增是葡萄球菌肠毒素B致死性的特征。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 13;9(2):e88756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088756. eCollection 2014.
2
Systemic inflammatory response syndrome: a new direction?全身炎症反应综合征:一个新方向?
Ir J Med Sci. 2003 Jan-Mar;172(1):7-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02914776.