Suppr超能文献

面部和颈部血管损伤的血管造影及经导管动脉栓塞术

Angiography and transcatheter arterial embolization of vascular injuries of the face and neck.

作者信息

Sclafani A P, Sclafani S J

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, New York Eye & Ear Infirmary, New York, USA.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 1996 Feb;106(2 Pt 1):168-73. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199602000-00012.

Abstract

The condition of patients sustaining penetrating neck trauma often appears deceptively stable, even when major structures have been injured. The clinician must identify patients who require treatment and limit invasive procedures in those without significant injuries. Angiography is often used to search for vascular damage following penetration of the neck and face. The charts of 401 hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating cervicofacial wounds who were evaluated by angiography followed, when necessary by either transcatheter arterial embolization and observation or surgery were reviewed. One hundred twelve patients (27.9%) had 131 vascular injuries identified by angiography; 77 (68.8%) of these patients sustained injuries to zone III of the neck or the face. The most commonly injured vessels were the internal carotid artery (ICA), the vertebral artery, and the external carotid artery (ECA) system. Multiple vessel injuries were seen in 17 (15.2%) of 112 patients and were more likely in patients with wounds in zone III or above than in those wounded in zone II or below (20.8% vs. 2.9%, respectively; P < .025). Injuries to the internal maxillary artery (IMA) (60%), ECA (53.3%), and the ICA (30.8%) were also significantly more likely to be accompanied by additional vascular injuries (P < .005). No clinically significant venous injuries were missed. Complications were noted in only 4 patients, and no deaths occurred as a result of angiography. Angiography is a safe, effective modality in the head and neck trauma setting. Particular scrutiny should be given to patients with zone III or facial wounds, particularly those with documented ICA, IMA, and ECA injuries, since these patients have a higher incidence of multiple vascular injuries.

摘要

颈部穿透伤患者的病情往往看似稳定,具有欺骗性,即便主要结构已受损。临床医生必须识别出需要治疗的患者,并对无严重损伤的患者限制侵入性操作。血管造影术常用于检查颈部和面部穿透伤后的血管损伤情况。我们回顾了401例血流动力学稳定的颈面部穿透伤患者的病历,这些患者接受了血管造影检查,必要时还接受了经导管动脉栓塞术、观察或手术治疗。血管造影检查发现112例患者(27.9%)存在131处血管损伤;其中77例(68.8%)患者的颈部III区或面部受伤。最常受伤的血管是颈内动脉(ICA)、椎动脉和颈外动脉(ECA)系统。112例患者中有17例(15.2%)出现多处血管损伤,颈部III区及以上受伤的患者比II区及以下受伤的患者更易出现多处血管损伤(分别为20.8%和2.9%;P < 0.025)。上颌内动脉(IMA)损伤(60%)、ECA损伤(53.3%)和ICA损伤(30.8%)也更易伴有其他血管损伤(P < 0.005)。未漏诊具有临床意义的静脉损伤。仅4例患者出现并发症,血管造影检查未导致死亡。在头颈部创伤情况下,血管造影术是一种安全、有效的检查方式。对于颈部III区或面部受伤的患者,尤其是有记录的ICA、IMA和ECA损伤的患者,应特别仔细检查,因为这些患者出现多处血管损伤的发生率较高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验