• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Differential effects of anxiolytic and non-anxiolytic benzodiazepine receptor ligands on performance of a differential reinforcement of low rate (DRL) schedule.

作者信息

Stephens D.N., Voet B.

机构信息

Department of Neuropsychopharmacology, Research Laboratories of Schering AG, D-13342 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Behav Pharmacol. 1994 Feb;5(1):4-14. doi: 10.1097/00008877-199402000-00001.

DOI:10.1097/00008877-199402000-00001
PMID:11224246
Abstract

The effects of several drugs acting at central benzodiazepine receptors on performance of a differential reinforcement of low rate (DRL) 15s schedule of reinforcement for food reward were studied in rats. The non-selective full agonists diazepam (0.1, 1.25, 5 and 10mg/kg) and lorazepam (0.1, 0.25, 0.375 and 0.5mg/kg) increased total numbers of responses and decreased the numbers of reinforcements received, increased burst responding (responding within 3s of a previous response), and produced a shift in the interresponse time (IRT) distribution of responses towards shorter intervals. The beta-carboline anxiolytic abecarnil (0.039, 0.156, 0.313 and 0.625mg/kg) was more potent than the two benzodiazepines, but otherwise gave rise to similar changes in performance. Bretazenil (0.1, 1.0, 10 and 30mg/kg), a non-selective partial agonist, and CL 218872 (3, 10, and 30mg/kg), a partial agonist showing preference for the BZ1 receptor subtype, also increased response rates and decreased numbers of reinforcements, but failed to increase significantly burst responding, and had only weak effects in shifting the IRT distribution. Alpidem (1, 3, 10, 30 and 100mg/kg) and zolpidem (0.33, 1, 3 and 10mg/kg), two imidazopyridines showing BZ1 preference, but classified respectively as an anxiolytic and a selective hypnotic agent, non-significantly reduced response rates and significantly reduced the numbers of reinforcements, but did not influence burst responding, and had effects on IRT distribution only at single doses. Thus, in general, the effects of these compounds on DRL performance reflect their activity in conflict models. The differential effects on DRL performance of the benzodiazepine receptor ligands tested may be attributable to their abilities to interact selectively as agonists or partial agonists at different benzodiazepine receptor subtypes.

摘要

相似文献

1
Differential effects of anxiolytic and non-anxiolytic benzodiazepine receptor ligands on performance of a differential reinforcement of low rate (DRL) schedule.
Behav Pharmacol. 1994 Feb;5(1):4-14. doi: 10.1097/00008877-199402000-00001.
2
Behavioural effects of novel benzodiazepine (omega) receptor agonists and partial agonists: increases in punished responding and antagonism of the pentylenetetrazole cue.新型苯二氮䓬(ω)受体激动剂和部分激动剂的行为效应:惩罚反应增加及对戊四氮提示的拮抗作用
Behav Pharmacol. 1995 Mar;6(2):116-126.
3
Effects of different classes of partial benzodiazepine agonists on punished and unpunished responding in pigeons.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1999 Jun;144(4):405-10. doi: 10.1007/s002130051024.
4
Differential effects of dopamine receptor subtype-specific agonists with respect to operant behavior maintained on a differential reinforcement of low-rate responding (DRL) schedule.多巴胺受体亚型特异性激动剂对以低速率反应差别强化(DRL)程序维持的操作性行为的不同影响。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2015 Mar;130:67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2015.01.002. Epub 2015 Jan 10.
5
Buspirone, gepirone, ipsapirone, and zalospirone have distinct effects on the differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate 72-s schedule when compared with 5-HTP and diazepam.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1994 Feb;114(1):39-46. doi: 10.1007/BF02245442.
6
Comparison of several benzodiazepine receptor ligands in two models of anxiolytic activity in the mouse: an analysis based on fractional receptor occupancies.几种苯二氮䓬受体配体在小鼠两种抗焦虑活性模型中的比较:基于受体占有率分数的分析
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1994 Mar;114(2):191-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02244836.
7
Discriminative stimulus properties of ethanol in the rat: differential effects of selective and nonselective benzodiazepine receptor agonists.乙醇在大鼠中的辨别性刺激特性:选择性和非选择性苯二氮䓬受体激动剂的不同作用
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1997 Dec;58(4):969-73. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(97)00034-8.
8
Antagonism by CGS 8216 and Ro 15-1788, benzodiazepines antagonists, of the action of chlordiazepoxide on a timing behavior in rats.苯二氮䓬拮抗剂CGS 8216和Ro 15 - 1788对氯氮卓在大鼠定时行为中作用的拮抗作用。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1984 Sep;21(3):381-5. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(84)80099-4.
9
Effects of drugs on response duration differentiation. VI: differential effects under differential reinforcement of low rates of responding schedules.药物对反应持续时间分化的影响。VI:低反应率强化程序下的差异效应。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997 Jun;281(3):1368-80.
10
Naloxone and chlordiazepoxide: effects on acquisition of DRL and signalled DRL.纳洛酮和氯氮䓬:对 DRL 和信号 DRL 获得的影响。
J Psychopharmacol. 1992 Jan;6(1):88-94. doi: 10.1177/026988119200600116.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethanol Reinforcement Elicits Novel Response Inhibition Behavior in a Rat Model of Ethanol Dependence.乙醇强化在乙醇依赖大鼠模型中引发新型反应抑制行为。
Brain Sci. 2018 Jun 26;8(7):119. doi: 10.3390/brainsci8070119.
2
Measuring impulsivity in mice: the five-choice serial reaction time task.测量小鼠的冲动性:五选连续反应时任务。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012 Jan;219(2):253-70. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2560-5. Epub 2011 Nov 18.
3
Effects of positive and negative modulators of the γ-aminobutyric acid A receptor complex on responding under a differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedule of reinforcement in rats.
γ-氨基丁酸A受体复合物的正负调节剂对大鼠低速率强化差别强化程序下反应的影响。
Behav Pharmacol. 2010 Dec;21(8):727-35. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e32833fa7c7.
4
Amphetamine increases schedule-induced drinking reduced by negative punishment procedures.苯丙胺增加了通过负惩罚程序减少的定时诱导饮水行为。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2003 May;167(2):123-9. doi: 10.1007/s00213-002-1382-x. Epub 2003 Mar 18.
5
AMPA antagonists differ from NMDA antagonists in their effects on operant DRL and delayed matching to position tasks.α-氨基-3-羟基-5-甲基-4-异恶唑丙酸(AMPA)拮抗剂与N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)拮抗剂在对操作性固定比率间隔(DRL)和延迟位置匹配任务的影响方面存在差异。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1996 Aug;126(3):249-59. doi: 10.1007/BF02246455.
6
Agonizing over antagonizing: what do benzodiazepine receptor antagonists demonstrate?纠结于拮抗作用:苯二氮䓬受体拮抗剂能证明什么?
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1996 Jul;126(2):182-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02246355.
7
Alprazolam, caffeine and their interaction: relating DRL performance to pharmacokinetics.阿普唑仑、咖啡因及其相互作用:将固定比率递减(DRL)表现与药代动力学相关联
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1996 Jul;126(2):115-24. doi: 10.1007/BF02246346.
8
The use of the rat elevated plus-maze to discriminate between non-selective and BZ-1 (omega 1) selective, benzodiazepine receptor ligands.使用大鼠高架十字迷宫来区分非选择性和BZ-1(ω1)选择性苯二氮䓬受体配体。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1996 Apr;124(3):245-54. doi: 10.1007/BF02246664.
9
Discriminative stimulus effects of midazolam and abecarnil in rats treated chronically with diazepam or abecarnil.咪达唑仑和阿贝卡尼对长期接受地西泮或阿贝卡尼治疗的大鼠的辨别性刺激作用。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1995 Oct;121(3):339-46. doi: 10.1007/BF02246073.