Suppr超能文献

[肝脏MRI中的相控阵表面线圈与屏气技术。传统自旋回波序列与快速脂肪抑制梯度回波及快速自旋序列的比较]

[Phased-array superficial coil and breath holding technique in MRI of the liver. Comparison of conventional spin echo sequences with rapid fat suppressing gradient echo and turbo-spin sequences].

作者信息

Helmberger T, Holzknecht N, Lackerbauer C A, Müller-Lisse U, Schnarkowski P, Gauger J, Reiser M

机构信息

Institut für Radiologische Diagnostik, Universität München.

出版信息

Radiologe. 1995 Dec;35(12):919-24.

PMID:8584635
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy of fast MRI techniques using a tailored imaging design (breathhold and array-surface coil), conventional T1-, T2-weighted spin-echo (SE) sequences and breathhold gradient-echo (GRE) T1- and breathhold fast SE T2-weighted images were compared.

METHODS

20 patients with proven focal liver lesions were studied on a 1.5 Tesla system. Conventional SE T1- and T2-weighted imaging, as well as GRE T1- and fast SE T2-weighted imaging was performed. Fast imaging was done during breathhold using an array-surface coil. For all sequences signal-to-noise ratios (S/N) and liver-to-lesion-contrast ratios (L/L) were measured and statistically compared. In addition, two blinded readers qualitatively evaluated all images, using a score system regarding artifacts (breathing, pulsation), number of lesions, and over-all image quality.

RESULTS

Regarding image quality parameters, S/N and L/L, there was no significant (p > 0.05) difference between the conventional and fast imaging techniques. However, GRE imaging was superior (84.8%) to conventional imaging for breathing and pulsation artifacts, while fast SE T2 imaging was equal regarding breathing artifacts, but superior (51.5%) regarding pulsation artifacts. The number of detected hepatic lesions was identical in all sequences.

CONCLUSION

The fast MRI techniques demonstrated a superiority to conventional imaging regarding image quality and presence of artifacts. Therefore, fast imaging techniques can replace conventional techniques, at least in patients that can sufficiently sustain breathing.

摘要

目的

采用定制成像设计(屏气和阵列表面线圈)确定快速MRI技术的疗效,比较传统的T1加权、T2加权自旋回波(SE)序列以及屏气梯度回波(GRE)T1加权和屏气快速SE T2加权图像。

方法

在1.5特斯拉系统上对20例经证实有局灶性肝病变的患者进行研究。进行传统的SE T1加权和T2加权成像,以及GRE T1加权和快速SE T2加权成像。使用阵列表面线圈在屏气期间进行快速成像。对所有序列测量信噪比(S/N)和肝病变对比度(L/L)并进行统计学比较。此外,两名不知情的阅片者使用关于伪影(呼吸、搏动)、病变数量和整体图像质量的评分系统对所有图像进行定性评估。

结果

关于图像质量参数、S/N和L/L,传统成像技术与快速成像技术之间无显著差异(p>0.05)。然而,GRE成像在呼吸和搏动伪影方面优于传统成像(84.8%),而快速SE T2成像在呼吸伪影方面相当,但在搏动伪影方面更优(51.5%)。所有序列中检测到的肝脏病变数量相同。

结论

快速MRI技术在图像质量和伪影存在方面显示出优于传统成像的优势。因此,快速成像技术可以取代传统技术,至少在能够充分耐受呼吸的患者中如此。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验