Helmberger T, Holzknecht N, Lackerbauer C A, Müller-Lisse U, Schnarkowski P, Gauger J, Reiser M
Institut für Radiologische Diagnostik, Universität München.
Radiologe. 1995 Dec;35(12):919-24.
To determine the efficacy of fast MRI techniques using a tailored imaging design (breathhold and array-surface coil), conventional T1-, T2-weighted spin-echo (SE) sequences and breathhold gradient-echo (GRE) T1- and breathhold fast SE T2-weighted images were compared.
20 patients with proven focal liver lesions were studied on a 1.5 Tesla system. Conventional SE T1- and T2-weighted imaging, as well as GRE T1- and fast SE T2-weighted imaging was performed. Fast imaging was done during breathhold using an array-surface coil. For all sequences signal-to-noise ratios (S/N) and liver-to-lesion-contrast ratios (L/L) were measured and statistically compared. In addition, two blinded readers qualitatively evaluated all images, using a score system regarding artifacts (breathing, pulsation), number of lesions, and over-all image quality.
Regarding image quality parameters, S/N and L/L, there was no significant (p > 0.05) difference between the conventional and fast imaging techniques. However, GRE imaging was superior (84.8%) to conventional imaging for breathing and pulsation artifacts, while fast SE T2 imaging was equal regarding breathing artifacts, but superior (51.5%) regarding pulsation artifacts. The number of detected hepatic lesions was identical in all sequences.
The fast MRI techniques demonstrated a superiority to conventional imaging regarding image quality and presence of artifacts. Therefore, fast imaging techniques can replace conventional techniques, at least in patients that can sufficiently sustain breathing.
采用定制成像设计(屏气和阵列表面线圈)确定快速MRI技术的疗效,比较传统的T1加权、T2加权自旋回波(SE)序列以及屏气梯度回波(GRE)T1加权和屏气快速SE T2加权图像。
在1.5特斯拉系统上对20例经证实有局灶性肝病变的患者进行研究。进行传统的SE T1加权和T2加权成像,以及GRE T1加权和快速SE T2加权成像。使用阵列表面线圈在屏气期间进行快速成像。对所有序列测量信噪比(S/N)和肝病变对比度(L/L)并进行统计学比较。此外,两名不知情的阅片者使用关于伪影(呼吸、搏动)、病变数量和整体图像质量的评分系统对所有图像进行定性评估。
关于图像质量参数、S/N和L/L,传统成像技术与快速成像技术之间无显著差异(p>0.05)。然而,GRE成像在呼吸和搏动伪影方面优于传统成像(84.8%),而快速SE T2成像在呼吸伪影方面相当,但在搏动伪影方面更优(51.5%)。所有序列中检测到的肝脏病变数量相同。
快速MRI技术在图像质量和伪影存在方面显示出优于传统成像的优势。因此,快速成像技术可以取代传统技术,至少在能够充分耐受呼吸的患者中如此。