Kersting M, Hansen C, Schöch G
Forschungsinstitut für Kinderernährung, Dortmund.
Z Ernahrungswiss. 1995 Dec;34(4):253-60. doi: 10.1007/BF01625336.
A survey and critical evaluation of the present-day supply of fortified common food products on the German market is presented concerning products, nutrients and amounts for fortification. The data were collected from the original food labels by personal informations from the manufacturers (40 asked, 68% answered) and by a local market survey in Dortmund (spring 1994). A total of 288 fortified food products (78 manufacturers) were found out of 6 different food products (78 manufacturers) were found out of 6 different food categories (manufacturers/products): beverages (26/95), sweets (24/57), cereals (5/53), milk products (7/35), powdered instant beverages (10/31), ready-to-eat meals (6/17). Sugar was added to 56% of the fortified products. A total of 10 vitamins (E, B1, B2, B6, B12, C, niacin, folate, biotin, pantothenic acid) and 7 minerals (Na, K, Cl, Ca, P, Mg, Fe) were used for fortification. The number of nutrients used for fortification in single products ranged from 1 (94 products) to 16 (3 products). The amounts used for fortification per average portion varied considerably among the different products and the different nutrients in the food categories. In a considerable number of cases, amounts for fortification of more than 100% (maximum 660%) of the recommended daily dose of a nutrient (EC-directive for nutrition labelling) have been observed. Relatively to the contribution of a portion to meet the energy requirement, the fortification of cereals and milk-products (about 30%) as well as of sweets (about 10%) could be rated as acceptable whereas the fortification of beverages (about 50-100%) was overdone. The present-day supply of fortified food is extremely heterogenous from the qualitative and quantitative point of view. Therefore, it is rather difficult for the consumer to reach an overall nutrient intake that is in accordance with the recommendations. The specific requirements of children, who are a preferred group for food advertising, are not at all considered adequately.
本文针对德国市场上强化普通食品的现状进行了调查与批判性评估,内容涉及产品、营养素及强化量。数据收集自原始食品标签,通过向制造商获取个人信息(共询问40家,68%给予回复)以及在多特蒙德进行的当地市场调查(1994年春季)。在6种不同食品类别(制造商/产品)中,共发现288种强化食品(78个制造商):饮料(26/95)、糖果(24/57)、谷物(5/53)、奶制品(7/35)、速溶粉状饮料(10/31)、即食餐(6/17)。56%的强化产品添加了糖。共有10种维生素(E、B1、B2、B6、B12、C、烟酸、叶酸、生物素、泛酸)和7种矿物质(钠、钾、氯、钙、磷、镁、铁)用于强化。单一产品中用于强化的营养素数量从1种(94种产品)到16种(3种产品)不等。不同产品以及食品类别中不同营养素的平均每份强化量差异很大。在相当多的情况下,观察到营养素的强化量超过了营养素推荐每日摄入量(欧盟营养标签指令)的100%(最高达660%)。相对于一份食物对满足能量需求的贡献而言,谷物和奶制品(约30%)以及糖果(约10%)的强化程度可被评为可接受,而饮料的强化(约50 - 100%)则过度了。从质量和数量角度来看当今强化食品的供应极其不均一。因此,消费者很难达到符合建议的总体营养素摄入量。食品广告的首选群体——儿童的特殊需求根本未得到充分考虑。