Suppr超能文献

非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者的临床管理。美国糖尿病协会实践指南(1985 - 1993年)的影响。内分泌专科医师基金会研究小组。

Clinical management of the NIDDM patient. Impact of the American Diabetes Association practice guidelines, 1985-1993. Endocrine Fellows Foundation Study Group.

作者信息

Stolar M W

机构信息

Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 1995 May;18(5):701-7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.18.5.701.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of the American Diabetes Association's (ADA's) standards of care for patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) on practice patterns among university-based endocrine physicians and fellows.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This study represents a retrospective chart-based review of 790 patients with NIDDM conducted by endocrine fellows in training at 42 academic institutions. By using an ADA guidelines-based questionnaire, patient management and adherence to the guidelines were assessed by reviewing charts dating > or = 3 years before, the year of, and 3 years after the guidelines' publication. All calculations were performed using the McNemar test, and all P values are two-sided.

RESULTS

The ADA standards of care have not had the significant impact in the clinical training setting that was anticipated. Deficiencies were noted in all aspects of the diabetic patient encounter and did not improve significantly following publication of the guidelines, except in the areas of foot care, eye examination, and lipid screening. Major deficiencies exist in areas of quality assurance and chart documentation, and these did not improve over time.

CONCLUSIONS

New strategies must be devised to increase awareness and implementation of these guidelines, both to enhance patient care and to improve the training of future diabetes caregivers.

摘要

目的

评估美国糖尿病协会(ADA)针对非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(NIDDM)患者的护理标准对大学内分泌科医生及住院医师的临床实践模式的影响。

研究设计与方法

本研究是对42所学术机构中接受培训的内分泌科住院医师所负责的790例NIDDM患者进行的一项基于病历的回顾性研究。通过使用一份基于ADA指南的问卷,通过查阅指南发布前≥3年、发布当年及发布后3年的病历,评估患者管理及对指南的遵循情况。所有计算均采用McNemar检验,所有P值均为双侧。

结果

ADA护理标准在临床培训环境中并未产生预期的显著影响。糖尿病患者诊疗的各个方面均存在不足,且指南发布后除足部护理、眼部检查及血脂筛查领域外,其余方面并未显著改善。质量保证及病历记录方面存在重大不足,且这些不足并未随时间推移而改善。

结论

必须制定新策略以提高对这些指南的认识并促进其实施,既为了加强患者护理,也为了改善未来糖尿病护理人员的培训。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验