Suppr超能文献

丁螺环酮与劳拉西泮疗效及突然停药的对照比较。

Controlled comparison of the effects and abrupt discontinuation of buspirone and lorazepam.

作者信息

Bourin M, Malinge M

机构信息

Groupe de Recherche Neurobiologie de l'anxiéte et GIS Médicament, Faculté de Médecine, Nantes France.

出版信息

Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 1995 Jul;19(4):567-75. doi: 10.1016/0278-5846(95)00102-2.

Abstract
  1. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects and abrupt discontinuation of buspirone 15 or 20 mg tid and lorazepam 3 or 4 mg tid following 8 weeks of treatment. A total of 43 outpatients with generalized anxiety disorder were included in the study and 39 entered the withdrawal phase. 2. Clinical assessments were performed at baseline, 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks (active phase) and after 9 and 10 weeks (withdrawal phase). These included the Hamilton anxiety scale, the visual analogue scale, the CHESS 84 (a check list for the evaluation of somatic symptoms) and the Lader tranquilizer withdrawal scale (translated in french). 3. Results show similar efficacy for lorazepam and buspirone during the active phase with a higher significant difference for buspirone on the CHESS 84 in relation with neurovegetatives symptoms: lorazepam D0 :16.30 +/- 3.14 D56: 5.10 +/- 0.93 (p < or = 0.01) buspirone D0 :18.82 +/- 3.4 D56: 4.73 +/- 1.18 (p < or = 0.001) No withdrawal phenomena was observed for both drugs using HAM-A lorazepam D63 :12.59 +/- 2.26 D70: 12.0 +/- 1.75 (p = ns) buspirone D63 :10.05 +/- 1.28 D70: 10.32 +/- 1.82 (p = ns) and the same significant difference using Lader scale: lorazepam D63 :4.44 +/- 0.89 D70: 6.96 +/- 1.28 (p < or = 0.05) buspirone D63 :2.95 +/- 0.66 D70: 4.15 +/- 0.92 (p < or = 0.05). 4. This study confirmed that buspirone was as effective as lorazepam at D56 in monitored outpatients with generalized anxiety disorder.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
摘要
  1. 本研究的目的是比较在8周治疗后,每日三次服用15毫克或20毫克丁螺环酮与每日三次服用3毫克或4毫克劳拉西泮的效果及突然停药的情况。共有43名广泛性焦虑症门诊患者纳入研究,39名进入撤药阶段。2. 在基线、第2、4、6和8周(治疗期)以及第9和10周(撤药期)进行临床评估。这些评估包括汉密尔顿焦虑量表、视觉模拟量表、CHESS 84(躯体症状评估清单)以及Lader安定药撤药量表(法语翻译版)。3. 结果显示,在治疗期劳拉西泮和丁螺环酮疗效相似,在CHESS 84上丁螺环酮在与植物神经症状相关方面有更高的显著差异:劳拉西泮D0:16.30±3.14,D56:5.10±0.93(p≤0.01);丁螺环酮D0:18.82±3.4,D56:4.73±1.18(p≤0.001)。使用HAM - A量表,两种药物均未观察到撤药现象:劳拉西泮D63:12.59±2.26,D70:12.0±1.75(p = 无显著差异);丁螺环酮D63:10.05±1.28,D70:10.32±1.82(p = 无显著差异)。使用Lader量表也有相同的显著差异:劳拉西泮D63:4.44±0.89,D70:6.96±1.28(p≤0.05);丁螺环酮D63:2.95±0.66,D70:4.15±0.92(p≤0.05)。4. 本研究证实,在接受监测的广泛性焦虑症门诊患者中,丁螺环酮在第56天时与劳拉西泮疗效相当。(摘要截选至250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验