von Nessen S, Volk S, Georgi K, Pflug B
Abteilung Klinische Psychiatrie II, Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland.
Wien Med Wochenschr. 1995;145(17-18):485-7.
Responders spent more time in active wakefulness than non-responders. Responders after TSD also spent significantly less time in substage C than non-responders, even before TSD. Parallel to the decrease of substage C, substage B slightly, but not significantly increased in responders after TSD. The Hamilton-scores before TSD correlated significantly with the time spent in substage C. Our system of scoring polygraphically defined waking stages, which combine electrophysiological, behavioral and cognitive aspects of the waking states in a setting comparable a every-day condition, differentiated responders and non-responders to sleep deprivation therapy. Thus it may serve as an useful tool to further elaborate wakefulness within the sleep-wake-cycle with special reference to chronotherapeutic interventions.
反应者在主动清醒状态下花费的时间比无反应者更多。即使在睡眠剥夺(TSD)之前,TSD后的反应者在C期花费的时间也比无反应者显著更少。与C期的减少并行,TSD后反应者的B期略有增加,但不显著。TSD前的汉密尔顿评分与在C期花费的时间显著相关。我们通过多导睡眠图定义清醒阶段的评分系统,在类似于日常条件的环境中结合了清醒状态的电生理、行为和认知方面,区分了对睡眠剥夺疗法有反应者和无反应者。因此,它可能是进一步阐述睡眠-觉醒周期中清醒状态的有用工具,特别是在时间治疗干预方面。