Volk S, von Nessen S, Brandt J, Georgi K, Pflug B
Klinik für Klinische Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie II, Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland.
Wien Med Wochenschr. 1996;146(13-14):309-10.
29 major depressive patients, the majority suffering from a melancholic subtype and typical diurnal variation of mood, rated subjective tiredness on a 100 mm analogous scale before and after total sleep deprivation (TSD). In study A every four hours during the day before and after TSD and every 2 hours during the TSD-night ratings were performed, in study B at 8.00 a.m. before and after TSD. The mean response rate was 55.2% in the 2 studies. In study A subsequent responders were less tired during the afternoon before TSD. Responding patients were more alert the morning after sleep deprivation than non-responders. A higher inter-individually variability of tiredness ratings in responders before and after sleep deprivation was found in study B, assuming an arousing property and a greater variability in subjective arousal at least during the morning hours. In summary the determination of the subjective arousal level may help to predict response.
29名重度抑郁症患者,大多数患有忧郁型亚型且情绪有典型的昼夜变化,在完全睡眠剥夺(TSD)前后,用100毫米类似量表对主观疲劳进行评分。在研究A中,在TSD前后白天每4小时以及TSD夜间每2小时进行评分,在研究B中,在TSD前后的上午8点进行评分。两项研究的平均反应率为55.2%。在研究A中,随后有反应的患者在TSD前的下午疲劳程度较轻。睡眠剥夺后的早晨,有反应的患者比无反应的患者更警觉。在研究B中,发现有反应者在睡眠剥夺前后疲劳评分的个体间变异性更高,这表明至少在上午时段具有唤醒特性和主观唤醒的更大变异性。总之,主观唤醒水平的测定可能有助于预测反应。