Proceed with care: new reproductive technologies and the need for boundaries.

Suppr

超能文献

作者信息

Baird P

机构信息

Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995 Sep;12(8):491-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02212911.

DOI:10.1007/BF02212911

PMID:8589567

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Proceed with care: new reproductive technologies and the need for boundaries.

J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995 Sep;12(8):491-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02212911.

Proposed curbs on reproductive technology.

Lancet. 1993 Dec 11;342(8885):1477-8. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92942-m.

The Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies: a critique of the final report.

Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can. 1994 Mar;27(2):99-102.

Canada could ban some reproductive technologies.

BMJ. 1994 Jan 15;308(6922):154-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6922.154a.

Ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies.

Fertil Steril. 1990 Jun;53(6) Suppl. 2):i-1S-109S.

Ethical considerations in contemporary reproductive technologies.

J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 1988 Jan;1(3):37-48. doi: 10.1097/00005237-198801000-00006.

The shadowlands--secrets, lies, and assisted reproduction.

N Engl J Med. 1998 Sep 24;339(13):935-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199809243391325.

Assisted fertilization: legal restraints proposed for UK.

Nature. 1984;310(5975):266. doi: 10.1038/310266a0.

Ethical issues of fertility and reproduction.

Annu Rev Med. 1996;47:107-16. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.47.1.107.

Statutory prohibitions and the regulation of new reproductive technologies under federal law in Canada.

McGill Law J. 1995 Aug;40(4):905-46.

引用本文的文献

The oversight and practice of oocyte donation in the United States, United Kingdom and Canada.

HEC Forum. 2011 Mar;23(1):15-30. doi: 10.1007/s10730-010-9145-2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

相似文献

Proceed with care: new reproductive technologies and the need for boundaries.

J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995 Sep;12(8):491-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02212911.

Proposed curbs on reproductive technology.

Lancet. 1993 Dec 11;342(8885):1477-8. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92942-m.

The Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies: a critique of the final report.

Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can. 1994 Mar;27(2):99-102.

Canada could ban some reproductive technologies.

BMJ. 1994 Jan 15;308(6922):154-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6922.154a.

Ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies.

Fertil Steril. 1990 Jun;53(6) Suppl. 2):i-1S-109S.

Ethical considerations in contemporary reproductive technologies.

J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 1988 Jan;1(3):37-48. doi: 10.1097/00005237-198801000-00006.

The shadowlands--secrets, lies, and assisted reproduction.

N Engl J Med. 1998 Sep 24;339(13):935-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199809243391325.

Assisted fertilization: legal restraints proposed for UK.

Nature. 1984;310(5975):266. doi: 10.1038/310266a0.

Ethical issues of fertility and reproduction.

Annu Rev Med. 1996;47:107-16. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.47.1.107.

Statutory prohibitions and the regulation of new reproductive technologies under federal law in Canada.

McGill Law J. 1995 Aug;40(4):905-46.

引用本文的文献

The oversight and practice of oocyte donation in the United States, United Kingdom and Canada.

HEC Forum. 2011 Mar;23(1):15-30. doi: 10.1007/s10730-010-9145-2.