• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国、英国和加拿大的卵子捐赠监管与实践。

The oversight and practice of oocyte donation in the United States, United Kingdom and Canada.

作者信息

Levine Aaron D

机构信息

School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, 30332-0345, USA.

出版信息

HEC Forum. 2011 Mar;23(1):15-30. doi: 10.1007/s10730-010-9145-2.

DOI:10.1007/s10730-010-9145-2
PMID:21170752
Abstract

In vitro fertilization using donated oocytes is an important medical technique that provides the only option for some infertile patients to have children. The technique remains ethically contentious, however, and, as a result of this controversy, different oversight approaches have been developed in countries around the world. This paper examines the oversight and practice of oocyte donation in Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States to examine how policy choices have influenced the development and use of this medical technology. Examining per capita utilization of oocyte donation in these three countries provides evidence that supply-side policies-specifically policies affecting the compensation of potential oocyte donors-have substantially influenced the use of this technology. These results should provide useful insight for policymakers developing or revising oocyte donation policies.

摘要

使用捐赠卵母细胞的体外受精是一项重要的医学技术,为一些不孕患者提供了生育的唯一选择。然而,该技术在伦理上仍存在争议,并且由于这一争议,世界各国已制定了不同的监管方法。本文考察了加拿大、英国和美国对卵母细胞捐赠的监管及实践情况,以探究政策选择如何影响了这项医学技术的发展和应用。考察这三个国家卵母细胞捐赠的人均利用率可发现,供应方政策——尤其是影响潜在卵母细胞捐赠者补偿的政策——已对该技术的应用产生了重大影响。这些结果应为制定或修订卵母细胞捐赠政策的政策制定者提供有益的见解。

相似文献

1
The oversight and practice of oocyte donation in the United States, United Kingdom and Canada.美国、英国和加拿大的卵子捐赠监管与实践。
HEC Forum. 2011 Mar;23(1):15-30. doi: 10.1007/s10730-010-9145-2.
2
The Report of the Warnock Committee on Human Fertilisation and Embryology.关于人类受精与胚胎学的沃诺克委员会报告。
Mod Law Rev. 1985 Jan;48(1):73-85.
3
[Oocyte donation as in France].[法国的卵子捐赠情况]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2010 Jan;38(1):23-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2009.10.001.
4
Compliance with donor age recommendations in oocyte donor recruitment advertisements in the USA.遵守美国卵母细胞捐赠者招募广告中的捐赠者年龄建议。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2013 Apr;26(4):400-5. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.11.011. Epub 2012 Dec 1.
5
New York State's landmark policies on oversight and compensation for egg donation to stem cell research.纽约州关于干细胞研究中卵子捐赠监督和补偿的具有里程碑意义的政策。
Regen Med. 2012 May;7(3):397-408. doi: 10.2217/rme.12.20. Epub 2012 Mar 29.
6
Assisted reproduction: should egg and sperm donors be paid?辅助生殖:卵子和精子捐赠者应该获得报酬吗?
J Fam Health Care. 2010;20(2):69-71.
7
Unmanaged care: the need to regulate new reproductive technologies in the United States.非管理式医疗:美国对新生殖技术进行监管的必要性。
Bioethics. 1997 Jul-Oct;11(3-4):348-65. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00075.
8
Payment to egg donors is the best way to ensure supply meets demand.向捐卵者付费是确保供应满足需求的最佳方式。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Nov;53:73-84. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.07.009. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
9
Ethical issues in transnational "mail order" oocyte donation.跨国“邮购”卵母细胞捐赠中的伦理问题。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006 Dec;95(3):302-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.07.008. Epub 2006 Sep 25.
10
Limitations on the compensation of gamete donors: a public opinion survey.配子捐赠者补偿的限制:一项公众意见调查。
Fertil Steril. 2017 Jun;107(6):1355-1363.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Reproductive ageing-turning back the clock?生殖衰老——时光倒流?
Ir J Med Sci. 2019 Feb;188(1):161-167. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1769-2. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
2
Assessing the use of assisted reproductive technology in the United States by non-United States residents.评估非美国居民在美国使用辅助生殖技术的情况。
Fertil Steril. 2017 Nov;108(5):815-821. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.07.1168. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
3
Buying and selling human eggs: infertility providers' ethical and other concerns regarding egg donor agencies.

本文引用的文献

1
Self-regulation, compensation, and the ethical recruitment of oocyte donors.自我调节、补偿与卵母细胞捐赠者的伦理招募
Hastings Cent Rep. 2010 Mar-Apr;40(2):25-36. doi: 10.1353/hcr.0.0245.
2
Interests, obligations, and rights of the donor in gamete donation.配子捐赠中捐赠者的利益、义务和权利。
Fertil Steril. 2009 Jan;91(1):22-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.09.062. Epub 2008 Dec 12.
3
The regulation of human embryo and stem-cell research in the United Kingdom.英国对人类胚胎与干细胞研究的监管。
买卖人类卵子:不孕不育治疗机构对卵子捐赠机构的伦理及其他担忧
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Nov 8;17(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0151-z.
4
Ethics and germline gene editing.伦理与生殖系基因编辑。
EMBO Rep. 2015 Aug;16(8):879-80. doi: 10.15252/embr.201540879. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
5
Egg donation brokers: an analysis of agency versus in vitro fertilization clinic websites.卵子捐赠中介:对中介机构与体外受精诊所网站的分析
J Reprod Med. 2014 Nov-Dec;59(11-12):534-41.
6
Oncofertility in Canada: cryopreservation and alternative options for future parenthood.加拿大的肿瘤生育力保护:冷冻保存和未来生育的替代选择。
Curr Oncol. 2014 Feb;21(1):e137-46. doi: 10.3747/co.20.1360.
7
The ethical, legal, and social issues impacted by modern assisted reproductive technologies.现代辅助生殖技术所影响的伦理、法律和社会问题。
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2012;2012:686253. doi: 10.1155/2012/686253. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008 Dec;9(12):998-1003. doi: 10.1038/nrm2550.
4
2008 Guidelines for gamete and embryo donation: a Practice Committee report.2008年配子与胚胎捐赠指南:实践委员会报告
Fertil Steril. 2008 Nov;90(5 Suppl):S30-44. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.090.
5
Repetitive oocyte donation.重复卵母细胞捐赠
Fertil Steril. 2008 Nov;90(5 Suppl):S194-5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.032.
6
Distributive justice and infertility treatment in Canada.加拿大的分配正义与不孕症治疗
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008 May;30(5):425-31. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)32828-6.
7
Financial compensation of oocyte donors.卵母细胞捐赠者的经济补偿。
Fertil Steril. 2007 Aug;88(2):305-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.104. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
8
A formal comparison of the practice of assisted reproductive technologies between Europe and the USA.欧洲与美国辅助生殖技术实践的正式比较。
Hum Reprod. 2006 Aug;21(8):1945-50. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del138. Epub 2006 May 11.
9
Lessons across the pond: assisted reproductive technology in the United Kingdom and the United States.大洋彼岸的经验教训:英国和美国的辅助生殖技术
Am J Law Med. 2005;31(4):419-46. doi: 10.1177/009885880503100402.
10
Oocyte and embryo donation 2006: reviewing two decades of innovation and controversy.2006年卵子与胚胎捐赠:回顾二十年的创新与争议
Reprod Biomed Online. 2006 Feb;12(2):153-62. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60855-3.