• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A comparison of three systems of classifying presenting problems in general practice.一般实践中三种呈现问题分类系统的比较。
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1977 Apr;27(177):236-40.
2
[Testing of the WONCA (World Organization of National Colleges, Academies & Academic Association of General Practitioners disease classification for use in general practice].[世界家庭医生组织（WONCA）疾病分类在全科医疗中的应用测试]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1977 Jul 4;139(27):1614-6.
3
An intregrated medical record and data system for primary care. Part 2: classifications of health problems for use by family physicians.基层医疗综合病历与数据系统。第2部分：家庭医生使用的健康问题分类。
J Fam Pract. 1977 Jun;4(6):1149-51.
4
A conversion code from the RCGP to the ICHPPC classification system.从皇家全科医师学院（RCGP）分类系统到国际初级卫生保健分类（ICHPPC）系统的转换代码。
J Fam Pract. 1977 Sep;5(3):415-24.
5
An international glossary for primary care. Report of the Classification Committee of the World Organization of National Colleges, Academies and Academic Associations of General Practitioners/Family Physicians (WONCA).一本初级保健国际术语汇编。世界家庭医生组织（WONCA）分类委员会报告。
J Fam Pract. 1981 Oct;13(5):671-81.
6
Consultations in general practice and at an Aboriginal community controlled health service: do they differ?在全科医疗和原住民社区控制的健康服务机构中的会诊：它们有差异吗？
Rural Remote Health. 2006 Jul-Sep;6(3):560. Epub 2006 Jul 19.
7
Primary health care ICD--a tool for general practice research.初级卫生保健国际疾病分类——全科医学研究工具
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2000 Apr-Jun;15(2):133-48. doi: 10.1002/1099-1751(200004/06)15:2<133::AID-HPM583>3.0.CO;2-J.
8
Classifying disease in general practice.在全科医疗中对疾病进行分类。
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1977 Apr;27(177):232-4.
9
[Utilization of the International Classification of Primary Care, a new family practice classification].[《国际初级保健分类》的应用，一种新的家庭医疗分类法]
Arch Belg. 1989;47(1-4):46-9.
10
[Differences in general practitioners' use of International Classification for Primary Care diagnoses. The interobserver and intraobserver variation].[全科医生对国际初级保健分类诊断的使用差异。观察者间和观察者内变异]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2003 Oct 20;165(43):4104-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Frequency distribution of health disorders in primary care-its consistency and meaning for diagnostics and nomenclature.初级保健中健康疾病的频率分布——其对诊断和命名的一致性及意义。
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2025 Apr;175(5-6):99-109. doi: 10.1007/s10354-024-01049-5. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
2
[Health disorders and their prevalence in two primary care practices from the perspective of different coding].[从不同编码角度看两种基层医疗实践中的健康问题及其患病率]
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2017 Oct;167(13-14):320-332. doi: 10.1007/s10354-017-0567-1. Epub 2017 May 10.

本文引用的文献

1
AN ANGLO-AMERICAN COMPARISON OF THE PREVALENCE OF BRONCHITIS.英美两国支气管炎患病率比较
Br Med J. 1964 Dec 12;2(5423):1487-91. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5423.1487.
2
The importance of coding presenting symptoms.对当前症状进行编码的重要性。
Can Med Assoc J. 1967 Oct 14;97(16):953-9.
3
Morbidity in family practice.家庭医疗中的发病率
Can Med Assoc J. 1969 Sep 6;101(5):259-63.
4
Medical records that guide and teach.具有指导和教学作用的医疗记录。
N Engl J Med. 1968 Mar 21;278(12):652-7 concl. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196803212781204.
5
Symptoms in general practice.全科医疗中的症状
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1971 Jan;21(102):32-43.
6
A disease classification system for analysis of medical care utilization, with a note on symptom classification.一种用于分析医疗服务利用情况的疾病分类系统，并附症状分类说明。
Health Serv Res. 1971 Fall;6(3):235-50.
7
Determinants of physician utilization: approach to a service-oriented classification of symptoms.医生诊疗利用的决定因素：一种面向服务的症状分类方法。
Med Care. 1972 Jul-Aug;10(4):300-9. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197207000-00003.
8
Respiratory disease in young adults: influence of early childhood lower respiratory tract illness, social class, air pollution, and smoking.年轻成年人的呼吸道疾病：幼儿期下呼吸道疾病、社会阶层、空气污染和吸烟的影响
Br Med J. 1973 Jul 28;3(5873):195-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5873.195.
9
Ambulatory medical care data. Report of the Conference on Ambulatory Medical Care Records: review of the conference proceedings.
Med Care. 1973 Mar-Apr;11(2):Suppl:13-34.
10
Ambulatory medical care data: methods for classifying symptoms, complaints, and conditions.门诊医疗护理数据：症状、主诉及病症的分类方法
Med Care. 1973 Mar-Apr;11(2):Suppl:101-8.

一般实践中三种呈现问题分类系统的比较。

A comparison of three systems of classifying presenting problems in general practice.

作者信息

Martini C J, Clayden A D, Turner I D

出版信息

J R Coll Gen Pract. 1977 Apr;27(177):236-40.

PMID:859156
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2157994/
Abstract

Three internationally recognized systems have been devised for classifying presenting problems in general practice. They are: the Royal College of General Practitioners' (1963) classification, the US Ambulatory Medical Care Classification of Symptoms (NAMCS), and the World Organization of Colleges and Academies of General Practice/Family Medicine (WONCA, 1976) classification which is known as An International Classification of Health Problems of Primary Care (ICHPPC).These three systems were compared in over 8,000 consultations conducted by 81 randomly selected British general practitioners in Nottinghamshire.For all ages of patient, the NAMCS, which has only 197 categories, was the most specific, and the least specific was the classification of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

摘要

已经设计出三种国际公认的系统来对全科医疗中的就诊问题进行分类。它们分别是：皇家全科医师学院（1963年）的分类系统、美国门诊医疗症状分类系统（NAMCS）以及世界全科/家庭医学院校协会（WONCA，1976年）的分类系统，即《基层医疗健康问题国际分类》（ICHPPC）。在诺丁汉郡随机挑选的81位英国全科医生进行的8000多次会诊中，对这三种系统进行了比较。对于所有年龄段的患者来说，只有197个类别的NAMCS最为具体，而最不具体的是皇家全科医师学院的分类系统。