Henriksson J, Johannisson A, Bergqvist P A, Norrgren L
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Institute of Pathology, Uppsala, Sweden.
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1996 Feb;30(2):213-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00215800.
The four arsenic-containing chemical warfare agents (CWA) Adamsite (technical, 10-chloro-9-10-dihydrophenarsazine), Clark 1 (Diphenyl arsine chloride), Clark 2 (Diphenyl arsine cyanide), and Lewisite (2-chloro-ethenyl dichloro arsine) were evaluated toxicologically using an in vitro and an in vivo model. The CWA were tested in vitro, using human leucocytes, in order to evaluate their effects on cell proliferation and cell cycle kinetics assayed by flow cytometry. The concentration for total inhibition of cell proliferation for the CWAs ranged from 0.3 micrograms/mL (Lewisite) to 15 micrograms/mL (Clark 1). The results showed no differences in cell proliferation between the different stages of the S-phase either at no-effect or at effect concentrations when samples treated with the CWAs were compared with untreated controls. As2O5 was used as a reference, and the arsenic concentration required for total inhibition of the cell proliferation was 1.7 mg/mL. A lower arsenic concentration, 0.83 micrograms/mL, showed a decreasing proliferation ration in the different parts of the S-phase with Searly and Slate having the highest and lowest ratios, respectively. In addition, there was a positive correlation between the unlabeled S-phase cell ratio and the arsenic concentration, indicating cessation of DNA-synthesis. Conclusively, the examined CWAs exerts a toxicity more potent than arsenic, with respect to cell proliferation. This might indicate that the toxicity of these arsenic-containing CWAs only to a minor extent can be explained by their arsenic content. Because of their relatively good water solubility and ability to easily degrade to arsenic acid, organo-arsenics, e.g., Lewisite, pose less of an environmental threat than organo-arsenics that are sparingly soluble and chemically persistent, like Adamsite. The four CWAs were also tested in vivo in a dietary exposure study, using juvenile three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.) as test organism, with measurement of EROD-activity and studies of liver morphology. The results from the in vivo study indicated small effects, suggesting that a 10-week period of dietary exposure at tested dose levels (1 and 100 ng/ml) affects juvenile three-spined stickleback only to a minor extent.
使用体外和体内模型对四种含砷化学战剂(CWA)进行了毒理学评估,这四种化学战剂分别是亚当氏气(工业级,10-氯-9,10-二氢吩胂嗪)、克拉克1号(二苯基胂化氯)、克拉克2号(二苯基胂化氰)和路易氏剂(2-氯乙烯基二氯胂)。使用人白细胞在体外对这些化学战剂进行测试,以评估它们对细胞增殖和通过流式细胞术测定的细胞周期动力学的影响。这些化学战剂对细胞增殖的完全抑制浓度范围为0.3微克/毫升(路易氏剂)至15微克/毫升(克拉克1号)。结果表明,当将用化学战剂处理的样品与未处理的对照进行比较时,在无效应浓度或效应浓度下,S期不同阶段之间的细胞增殖没有差异。以五氧化二砷作为参考,完全抑制细胞增殖所需的砷浓度为1.7毫克/毫升。较低的砷浓度0.83微克/毫升显示,在S期的不同部分增殖率降低,其中S早期和S晚期的增殖率分别最高和最低。此外,未标记的S期细胞比例与砷浓度之间存在正相关,表明DNA合成停止。总之,就细胞增殖而言,所检测的化学战剂的毒性比砷更强。这可能表明,这些含砷化学战剂的毒性仅在很小程度上可以用其砷含量来解释。由于它们相对良好的水溶性以及易于降解为砷酸的能力,有机砷(如路易氏剂)对环境造成的威胁小于难溶性且化学性质稳定的有机砷(如亚当氏气)。在一项饮食暴露研究中,还使用幼年三刺鱼(Gasterosteus aculeatus L.)作为受试生物,在体内对这四种化学战剂进行了测试,测量了乙氧基异吩唑酮-O-脱乙基酶(EROD)活性并研究了肝脏形态。体内研究结果表明影响较小,这表明在测试剂量水平(1和100纳克/毫升)下进行10周的饮食暴露仅对幼年三刺鱼有轻微影响。