Liberati A, Apolone G, Lang T, Lorenzo S
Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology, Mario Negri Institute, Milan, Italy.
Int J Qual Health Care. 1995 Sep;7(3):187-99. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/7.3.187.
This paper presents the background, objectives and preliminary results of a coordinated European Project involving researchers in seven countries aimed at harmonizing methods to assess inappropriate use of hospital care and qualifying its determinants. After briefly reviewing the philosophy of the European Union "Concerted Action" program in the context of current attempts at reforming the way health care is financed and delivered in several member states, the paper presents results obtained so far. Besides a method workshop where the approaches and methodologies used were compared, during the first year the following tasks have been undertaken: (a) identification and appraisal of a few dozen empirical studies conducted in various countries; (b) qualitative comparison of the instruments used to assess appropriateness; (c) initial development of a common list of reasons for inappropriate hospital use of potential relevance in European health care systems. While the project has already undoubtedly indicated the great potential of European collaboration in health services research, the large number of unpublished studies traced indicates--among other things--the need to create channels through which results of this type of research can be disseminated.
本文介绍了一个欧洲协调项目的背景、目标和初步成果。该项目涉及七个国家的研究人员,旨在统一评估医院护理不当使用情况的方法并确定其决定因素。在简要回顾欧盟“协调行动”计划在几个成员国当前医疗保健融资和提供方式改革背景下的理念后,本文展示了迄今为止取得的成果。除了一个对所使用的方法和方法论进行比较的方法研讨会外,在第一年还开展了以下任务:(a) 识别和评估在不同国家进行的几十项实证研究;(b) 对用于评估适当性的工具进行定性比较;(c) 初步制定一份在欧洲医疗保健系统中可能具有相关性的医院使用不当原因的通用清单。虽然该项目无疑已经表明了欧洲在卫生服务研究方面合作的巨大潜力,但大量未发表的研究表明——除其他外——需要建立渠道来传播这类研究的结果。