• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一个评估医院利用适宜性的欧洲项目:背景、目标与初步结果。项目指导小组与协调中心。

A European project assessing the appropriateness of hospital utilization: background, objectives and preliminary results. The Project Steering Group and the Coordinating Center.

作者信息

Liberati A, Apolone G, Lang T, Lorenzo S

机构信息

Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology, Mario Negri Institute, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 1995 Sep;7(3):187-99. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/7.3.187.

DOI:10.1093/intqhc/7.3.187
PMID:8595455
Abstract

This paper presents the background, objectives and preliminary results of a coordinated European Project involving researchers in seven countries aimed at harmonizing methods to assess inappropriate use of hospital care and qualifying its determinants. After briefly reviewing the philosophy of the European Union "Concerted Action" program in the context of current attempts at reforming the way health care is financed and delivered in several member states, the paper presents results obtained so far. Besides a method workshop where the approaches and methodologies used were compared, during the first year the following tasks have been undertaken: (a) identification and appraisal of a few dozen empirical studies conducted in various countries; (b) qualitative comparison of the instruments used to assess appropriateness; (c) initial development of a common list of reasons for inappropriate hospital use of potential relevance in European health care systems. While the project has already undoubtedly indicated the great potential of European collaboration in health services research, the large number of unpublished studies traced indicates--among other things--the need to create channels through which results of this type of research can be disseminated.

摘要

本文介绍了一个欧洲协调项目的背景、目标和初步成果。该项目涉及七个国家的研究人员,旨在统一评估医院护理不当使用情况的方法并确定其决定因素。在简要回顾欧盟“协调行动”计划在几个成员国当前医疗保健融资和提供方式改革背景下的理念后,本文展示了迄今为止取得的成果。除了一个对所使用的方法和方法论进行比较的方法研讨会外,在第一年还开展了以下任务:(a) 识别和评估在不同国家进行的几十项实证研究;(b) 对用于评估适当性的工具进行定性比较;(c) 初步制定一份在欧洲医疗保健系统中可能具有相关性的医院使用不当原因的通用清单。虽然该项目无疑已经表明了欧洲在卫生服务研究方面合作的巨大潜力,但大量未发表的研究表明——除其他外——需要建立渠道来传播这类研究的结果。

相似文献

1
A European project assessing the appropriateness of hospital utilization: background, objectives and preliminary results. The Project Steering Group and the Coordinating Center.一个评估医院利用适宜性的欧洲项目:背景、目标与初步结果。项目指导小组与协调中心。
Int J Qual Health Care. 1995 Sep;7(3):187-99. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/7.3.187.
2
A European version of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol. Goals and presentation. The BIOMED I Group on Appropriateness of Hospital Use.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1999 Winter;15(1):185-97. doi: 10.1017/s0266462399152784.
3
European collaboration on appropriateness of hospital bed use: a commentary.欧洲医院病床使用适宜性协作研究:一篇评论
Int J Qual Health Care. 1995 Sep;7(3):185-6. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/7.3.185.
4
An experience of utilization review in Europe: sequel to a BIOMED project.欧洲利用审查的经验:一个生物医学项目的后续
Int J Qual Health Care. 1999 Feb;11(1):13-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/11.1.13.
5
The evolution of hospital utilization review methods in the United States.美国医院利用情况审查方法的演变
Int J Qual Health Care. 1995 Sep;7(3):253-60. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/7.3.253.
6
Appropriateness of hospital use: an overview of Italian studies.医院使用的适宜性:意大利研究综述
Int J Qual Health Care. 1995 Sep;7(3):219-25. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/7.3.219.
7
An overview of Spanish studies on appropriateness of hospital use.西班牙关于医院使用适宜性的研究综述。
Int J Qual Health Care. 1995 Sep;7(3):213-8. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/7.3.213.
8
Medical appropriateness of hospital utilization: an overview of the Swiss experience.医院利用的医疗适宜性:瑞士经验概述
Int J Qual Health Care. 1995 Sep;7(3):227-32. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/7.3.227.
9
Evaluation of a hospital-based utilization management program.一项基于医院的利用管理项目评估。
Healthc Manage Forum. 1995 Spring;8(1):38-45. doi: 10.1016/S0840-4704(10)60894-0.
10
A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.补充和替代医学研究路线图——到2020年我们需要了解的内容。
Forsch Komplementmed. 2014;21(2):e1-16. doi: 10.1159/000360744. Epub 2014 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors and reasons for inappropriate hospitalization days for surgical patients in a tertiary hospital in Wuhan, China: a retrospective study.中国武汉一家三级医院手术患者住院日不当的预测因素及原因:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 1;21(1):900. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06845-y.
2
Effectiveness of hospital emergency department regionalization and categorization policy on appropriate patient emergency care use: a nationwide observational study in Taiwan.医院急诊科区域化和分类政策对适当的急诊患者护理利用的效果:台湾的一项全国性观察性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-06006-7.
3
Appropriateness of emergency care use: a retrospective observational study based on professional versus patients' perspectives in Taiwan.
急诊医疗使用的适宜性:基于台湾专业人士与患者视角的回顾性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 May 11;10(5):e033833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033833.
4
Have the Pilot County Hospitals' Service Capability Been Improved Since the Healthcare Reform? An Analysis of 370 Hospitals in China.医疗改革后试点县级医院的服务能力是否得到提升?对中国370家医院的分析
Iran J Public Health. 2019 Mar;48(3):474-483.
5
Current level and determinants of inappropriate admissions to township hospitals under the new rural cooperative medical system in China: a cross-sectional study.中国新型农村合作医疗制度下乡镇医院不适当入院的现状及影响因素:一项横断面研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Dec 18;14:649. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0649-3.
6
Effectiveness of a physician-oriented feedback intervention on inappropriate hospital stays.以医生为导向的反馈干预对不当住院时间的有效性。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Feb;61(2):128-34. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.040428.
7
Review of the utilisation of a university hospital in Barcelona (Spain): evolution 1992-1996.西班牙巴塞罗那一家大学医院的使用情况回顾:1992 - 1996年的演变
Eur J Epidemiol. 2001;17(7):679-84. doi: 10.1023/a:1015563618836.