• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲利用审查的经验:一个生物医学项目的后续

An experience of utilization review in Europe: sequel to a BIOMED project.

作者信息

Lorenzo S, Beech R, Lang T, Santos-Eggimann B

机构信息

Gabinete del Plan de Calidad, Fundación Hospital Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 1999 Feb;11(1):13-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/11.1.13.

DOI:10.1093/intqhc/11.1.13
PMID:10411285
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop and test a utilization review screening tool for use in European hospitals.

SETTING

In 1993 a group of researchers financed by a European Union grant reviewed the use of utilization review in Europe. They quickly noticed a lack of specifically designed instruments able to take into account the health care and cultural differences across Europe, and available for use in different health care systems. Hence, they embarked upon the task of developing and testing a utilization review screening tool for use in European hospitals.

RESULTS

The European Union-Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol's list of reasons was developed and assessed. This is a common taxonomy that classifies days identified as unnecessary and provides a list of levels of care to identify patients' needs. This new protocol not only substitutes for the multiple previous local versions of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol, but will also facilitate comparisons of the varying experiences in European countries.

MAIN FINDINGS

Development of utilization review in Europe has been carried out mostly on a voluntary basis and the main objective was not control. The experience varies widely: from France, where utilization review is still developing and research has been implemented by local teams, to Portugal, where utilization review programmes have been initiated by government authorities. At this point different initiatives in quality improvement, and more specifically in utilization review, are being developed within the European context.

摘要

目的

开发并测试一种供欧洲医院使用的利用情况审查筛选工具。

背景

1993年,一组由欧盟资助的研究人员对欧洲利用情况审查的使用情况进行了评估。他们很快注意到,缺乏专门设计的工具来考虑欧洲各地的医疗保健和文化差异,也没有可供不同医疗保健系统使用的工具。因此,他们着手开发并测试一种供欧洲医院使用的利用情况审查筛选工具。

结果

制定并评估了欧盟适用性评估协议的理由清单。这是一种通用分类法,对被认定为不必要的天数进行分类,并提供护理级别清单以确定患者的需求。这一新协议不仅取代了之前多个地方版本的适用性评估协议,还将便于比较欧洲各国的不同经验。

主要发现

欧洲利用情况审查的开展大多是自愿的,主要目标不是控制。经验差异很大:从利用情况审查仍在发展且由当地团队开展研究的法国,到由政府当局启动利用情况审查计划的葡萄牙。此时,欧洲范围内正在开展不同的质量改进举措,尤其是利用情况审查方面的举措。

相似文献

1
An experience of utilization review in Europe: sequel to a BIOMED project.欧洲利用审查的经验:一个生物医学项目的后续
Int J Qual Health Care. 1999 Feb;11(1):13-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/11.1.13.
2
A European version of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol. Goals and presentation. The BIOMED I Group on Appropriateness of Hospital Use.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1999 Winter;15(1):185-97. doi: 10.1017/s0266462399152784.
3
A European project assessing the appropriateness of hospital utilization: background, objectives and preliminary results. The Project Steering Group and the Coordinating Center.一个评估医院利用适宜性的欧洲项目:背景、目标与初步结果。项目指导小组与协调中心。
Int J Qual Health Care. 1995 Sep;7(3):187-99. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/7.3.187.
4
Reliability study of the European appropriateness evaluation protocol.
Int J Qual Health Care. 1999 Oct;11(5):419-24. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/11.5.419.
5
Application of quality improvement strategies in 389 European hospitals: results of the MARQuIS project.质量改进策略在389家欧洲医院中的应用:MARQuIS项目的结果。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i28-37. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029363.
6
[A proposal for reforming psychologists' training in France and in the European Union].[关于法国及欧盟心理学家培训改革的一项提议]
Encephale. 2009 Feb;35(1):18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.11.008. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
7
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
8
Utilization of health care services by migrants in Europe-a systematic literature review.欧洲移民对医疗保健服务的利用——一项系统的文献综述
Br Med Bull. 2017 Jan 1;121(1):5-18. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldw057.
9
A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.补充和替代医学研究路线图——到2020年我们需要了解的内容。
Forsch Komplementmed. 2014;21(2):e1-16. doi: 10.1159/000360744. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
10
Organ Donation European Quality System: ODEQUS project methodology.欧洲器官捐献质量体系:ODEQUS项目方法
Transplant Proc. 2013;45(10):3462-5. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.09.009.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of a physician-oriented feedback intervention on inappropriate hospital stays.以医生为导向的反馈干预对不当住院时间的有效性。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Feb;61(2):128-34. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.040428.