Suppr超能文献

使用非甾体抗炎药阶梯式护理处方方案节省成本。

Cost savings using a stepped-care prescribing protocol for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

作者信息

Jones D L, Kroenke K, Landry F J, Tomich D J, Ferrel R J

机构信息

Internal Medicine Service, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC 20307-5001, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 1996 Mar 27;275(12):926-30.

PMID:8598620
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To lower nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) costs while maintaining quality patient care and clinician satisfaction.

DESIGN

Before and after 21-month trial with one study site and two control sites and a questionnaire that was sent to 203 clinicians.

SETTING AND SUBJECTS

Two military medical centers and two affiliated primary care clinics. All beneficiaries filling outpatient NSAID prescriptions.

INTERVENTIONS

An NSAID prescribing protocol was implemented requiring a trial of either ibuprofen or indomethacin before new prescription of more expensive NSAIDs. One control center used an NSAID computer cost-prompt and the other had no intervention.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The proportion of expensive NSAIDs prescribed at each institution and total NSAID costs adjusted for prescription volume. Clinician acceptance and patient impact were assessed by the questionnaire.

RESULTS

Study site clinicians (n=158) reported very few protocol-related patient care problems. A minority (9%) of study site clinicians considered the protocol very bothersome, and only 2% felt it should be discontinued. Quarterly use of expensive NSAIDs at the study site fell from 34% to 21%, decreasing costs by 30% (P<.001). In contrast, the site with a computer cost-prompt had only a 5% decrease in NSAID costs, while costs at the site with no intervention increased 2%.

CONCLUSIONS

For drugs with similar benefits and adverse effects, a "stepped formulary" approach requiring an initial trial of one of the less expensive agents can maintain physician prescribing choices and satisfaction while lowering costs.

摘要

目的

在维持优质患者护理和临床医生满意度的同时降低非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)成本。

设计

在一个研究地点和两个对照地点进行为期21个月的前后试验,并向203名临床医生发送问卷。

地点和受试者

两个军事医疗中心和两个附属基层医疗诊所。所有填写门诊NSAID处方的受益人。

干预措施

实施了一项NSAID处方方案,要求在新开更昂贵的NSAID处方之前先试用布洛芬或吲哚美辛。一个对照中心使用NSAID计算机成本提示,另一个未进行干预。

主要观察指标

各机构开具的昂贵NSAID的比例以及根据处方量调整后的NSAID总成本。通过问卷评估临床医生的接受度和对患者的影响。

结果

研究地点的临床医生(n = 158)报告与方案相关的患者护理问题极少。少数(9%)研究地点的临床医生认为该方案非常麻烦,只有2%的人认为应停止该方案。研究地点昂贵NSAID的季度使用量从34%降至21%,成本降低了30%(P <.001)。相比之下,使用计算机成本提示的地点NSAID成本仅下降了5%,而未进行干预的地点成本增加了2%。

结论

对于具有相似益处和不良反应的药物,采用“阶梯式处方集”方法,要求先试用一种较便宜的药物之一,可以在降低成本的同时维持医生的处方选择和满意度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验