Sawaya A L, Tucker K, Tsay R, Willett W, Saltzman E, Dallal G E, Roberts S B
US Department of Agriculture Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, MA, U.S.A.
Am J Clin Nutr. 1996 Apr;63(4):491-9. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/63.4.491.
The accuracy and precision of four different food intake assessment methods were evaluated in young and older women by comparing reported energy intakes with doubly labeled water measurements total energy expenditure (TEE). A study lasting 8 d was conducted in 10 young women aged 25.2+/-1.1 y (-x+/-SEM) and in 10 older women aged 74.0+/-1.4 y. Free-living TEE was measured over 7 d and food consumption was determined from weighed food intake data (7 d), a 24-h food recall (in duplicate), and two different food-frequency questionnaires [Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (FHCRC)/Block and Willett, both in duplicate]. In addition, body composition was determined by using hydrodensitometry, and strenuous physical activity and the extent of dietary restraint were determined by questionnaire. In young women, 24-h recall gave mean energy intakes that were closest to measures of TEE (-0.34+/-3.71 MJ/d compared with TEE, P=0.178), and energy intakes by food-frequency questionnaires were the only intake data that correlated significantly with individual values for TEE (P<0.05). In older women, food-frequency questionnaires gave mean energy intakes that were closest to measured TEE (+0.53+/-2.95 MJ/d with the Willett questionnaire and -1.19+/-3.02 MJ/d with FHCRC/Block questionnaire). No energy intake data from this group correlated significantly with values for TEE. The 7-d weighed dietary intakes were significantly lower than measured TEE in both young and older women (-2.0 MJ/d in young and older women combined, P<0.001), and did not correlate significantly with values for TEE, although they did most closely mirror the mean difference in TEE between the young and older women (2.30 MJ/d for TEE and 2.11 MJ/d for 7-d weighed intake). These data suggest that none of the methods studied gave accurate estimates of the usual energy requirements of individual subjects. In addition, the results suggest that for some types of studies, simple methods for assessing group mean dietary intake may actually give more accurate information than weighed dietary intakes.
通过比较报告的能量摄入量与双标水测量的总能量消耗(TEE),评估了四种不同食物摄入量评估方法在年轻女性和老年女性中的准确性和精密度。对10名年龄为25.2±1.1岁(均值±标准误)的年轻女性和10名年龄为74.0±1.4岁的老年女性进行了一项为期8天的研究。在7天内测量自由生活状态下的TEE,并根据称重食物摄入量数据(7天)、24小时食物回顾(重复两次)以及两种不同的食物频率问卷[弗雷德·哈钦森癌症研究中心(FHCRC)/布洛克问卷和威利特问卷,均重复两次]来确定食物消耗量。此外,使用水下称重法测定身体成分,并通过问卷确定剧烈身体活动和饮食限制程度。在年轻女性中,24小时回顾法得出的平均能量摄入量最接近TEE测量值(与TEE相比为-0.34±3.71兆焦/天,P = 0.178),食物频率问卷得出的能量摄入量是唯一与个体TEE值显著相关的摄入量数据(P<0.05)。在老年女性中,食物频率问卷得出的平均能量摄入量最接近测量的TEE(威利特问卷为+0.53±2.95兆焦/天,FHCRC/布洛克问卷为-1.19±3.02兆焦/天)。该组的能量摄入量数据均与TEE值无显著相关性。年轻女性和老年女性的7天称重饮食摄入量均显著低于测量的TEE(年轻女性和老年女性合并为-2.0兆焦/天,P<0.001),且与TEE值无显著相关性,尽管它们最能反映年轻女性和老年女性之间TEE的平均差异(TEE为2.30兆焦/天,7天称重摄入量为2.11兆焦/天)。这些数据表明,所研究的方法均未准确估计个体受试者的通常能量需求。此外,结果表明,对于某些类型的研究,评估群体平均饮食摄入量的简单方法实际上可能比称重饮食摄入量提供更准确的信息。