Jech R, Růzicka E
Neurologická klinika 1. LF UK a VFN, Praha.
Cas Lek Cesk. 1995 Dec 13;134(24):791-7.
There are significant changes of perception and cognition during aging. Goal of this study was to investigate these functions by means of evoked potentials, and to obtain normative data in older people for comparisons with cognitive disorders in the elderly.
Twenty three healthy subjects (14 women and 9 men), aged 59 to 82 years (average 68 years), were examined for auditory event-related potentials (AERP) and somatosensory event-related potentials (SERP) using pattern reversal stimulation with large squares (1 degree 10') and small vertical bars (10'). The exogenous components N1 and P2 in both AERP and SERP exhibited significantly longer latencies and higher amplitude in response to target stimuli compared to an indifferent stimulus, a fact attributable to selective attention mechanisms (AERP: N1 delay 8 ms, p < 0.001; P2 delay 11 ms, p < 0.05; increase in amplitude N1/P2 2.2 microV, p < 0.01; SERP: N1 delay 8 ms, p < 0.05; P2 17 ms, p < 0.01; increase in amplitude N1/P2 8 microV, p < 0.001). As for the endogenous components N2 and P3, there were no latency differences between the two modalities (N2: p < 0.4; P3a: p < 02; P3b: p < 0.2). Significant correlations were found between P3 latencies AERP and SERP (r = 0.56, p < 0.01). N1, P2, N2 and P3b latencies of the AERP and P3a, P3b of the SERP correlated significantly with age. The average annual increase was 3.9 ms for P3b AERP (p < 0.01) and 3.2 ms for P3b SERP (p < 0.01). These values are markedly higher than the data reported by other authors for groups of lower average age. In the VEP, an age-related increase was seen in the N70 latency (0.6 ms/year, p < 0.05) and in the P100 latency (0.8 ms/year, p < 0.05) in response to the smaller bars stimulus and in the N140 latency (1.2 ms/year, p < 0.01) in response to the larger squares stimulus.
We confirm an age-related increase in latencies of the AERP and SERP, which is markedly higher than the increase described in other studies with younger subjects. This finding is important to keep in mind in order to avoid false positives of cognitive deficits in older patients. The latencies of later components, compared with earlier components of the VEP, AERP and SERP are more dependent on age. This may suggest that there are universal aging influences on the neuronal conduction velocity. The latencies of the P3b SERP and N2 AERP were found to be correlated with the N140 VEP with the smaller bars stimulus. These findings suggest that parameters of some waves may be modulated by certain other factors than age.
衰老过程中感知和认知会发生显著变化。本研究的目的是通过诱发电位来研究这些功能,并获取老年人的规范数据,以便与老年人的认知障碍进行比较。
对23名健康受试者(14名女性和9名男性)进行了检查,年龄在59至82岁之间(平均68岁),使用大正方形(1度10')和小竖条(10')的模式反转刺激来检测听觉事件相关电位(AERP)和体感事件相关电位(SERP)。与无关刺激相比,AERP和SERP中的外源性成分N1和P2在对目标刺激的反应中表现出明显更长的潜伏期和更高的波幅,这归因于选择性注意机制(AERP:N1延迟8毫秒,p < 0.001;P2延迟11毫秒,p < 0.05;N1/P2波幅增加2.2微伏,p < 0.01;SERP:N1延迟8毫秒,p < 0.05;P2 17毫秒,p < 0.01;N1/P2波幅增加8微伏,p < 0.001)。至于内源性成分N2和P3,两种模式之间没有潜伏期差异(N2:p < 0.4;P3a:p < 0.2;P3b:p < 0.2)。发现AERP和SERP的P3潜伏期之间存在显著相关性(r = 0.56,p < 0.01)。AERP的N1、P2、N2和P3b潜伏期以及SERP的P3a、P3b与年龄显著相关。P3b AERP的平均每年增加为3.9毫秒(p < 0.01),P3b SERP的平均每年增加为3.2毫秒(p < 0.01)。这些值明显高于其他作者报道的平均年龄较低组的数据。在视觉诱发电位(VEP)中,对较小竖条刺激的反应中,N70潜伏期(每年0.6毫秒,p < 0.05)和P100潜伏期(每年0.8毫秒,p < 0.05)以及对较大正方形刺激的反应中N140潜伏期(每年1.2毫秒,p < 0.01)出现与年龄相关的增加。
我们证实AERP和SERP的潜伏期存在与年龄相关的增加,这明显高于其他针对较年轻受试者的研究所描述的增加。为避免老年患者认知缺陷的假阳性结果,牢记这一发现很重要。与VEP、AERP和SERP的早期成分相比,后期成分的潜伏期更依赖于年龄。这可能表明神经元传导速度存在普遍的衰老影响。发现P3b SERP和N2 AERP的潜伏期与对较小竖条刺激的N140 VEP相关。这些发现表明某些波的参数可能受年龄以外的某些其他因素调节。