Frederiksen K, Tariot P, De Jonghe E
Department of Psychiatry, Unversity of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996 Mar;44(3):305-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb00920.x.
To compare mandated Minimum Data Set Plus (MDS+) ratings of behavior, function, mood, communication, and cognition to ratings of these domains using analogous research instruments.
Cross-sectional correlational study of criterion-related validity.
Three nursing homes in Rochester, New York.
Fifty-two nursing home residents.
Nursing home staff completed the MDS+ for each subject. Research scales were completed by trained research clinicians, independently of and blinded to the MDS+ results, using the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Dementia Mood Assessment Scale (DMAS), Psychogeriatric Dependency Rating Scale (PGDRS), and Physical Signs and Symptoms Scale (PSMS).
MDS+ measures of functional status, cognitive impairment, and communication were highly correlated with comparable research rating scale scores. Pearson correlation between MDS-functional status and PSMS scores was 0.89, between MDS-dementia and BPRS Factor 3 (representing cognitive dysfunction) and MMSE scores was 0.85 and 0.77, respectively, and between MDS-communication and MMSE and PGDRS Item 6 (assessing communication) scores was 0.74 and 0.62, respectively. Behavior and mood scores did not correlate nearly as well with comparable research scale scores. Pearson correlation between MDS- behavior and PGDRS and BPRS total scores was 0.54 and 0.51, respectively , and between MDS-mood and BPRS Factor 1 (depression) and DMAS 1-17 subtotal (mood disturbance) scores was 0.20 and 0.20, respectively.
This preliminary study in a small sample shows marked agreement between three of the five MDS+ components analyzed and comparable research rating scales and confirms that behavior and mood are difficult to assess with simple instruments.
比较强制使用的最小数据集增强版(MDS+)在行为、功能、情绪、沟通和认知方面的评分与使用类似研究工具对这些领域的评分。
与标准相关效度的横断面相关性研究。
纽约罗切斯特的三家养老院。
52名养老院居民。
养老院工作人员为每位受试者完成MDS+。研究量表由经过培训的研究临床医生独立于MDS+结果并在对其不知情的情况下完成,使用简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)、简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)、痴呆症情绪评估量表(DMAS)、老年精神科依赖评定量表(PGDRS)和身体体征与症状量表(PSMS)。
MDS+在功能状态、认知障碍和沟通方面的测量结果与类似研究评定量表得分高度相关。MDS-功能状态与PSMS得分之间的Pearson相关性为0.89,MDS-痴呆与BPRS因子3(代表认知功能障碍)和MMSE得分之间的相关性分别为0.85和0.77,MDS-沟通与MMSE和PGDRS项目6(评估沟通)得分之间的相关性分别为0.74和0.62。行为和情绪得分与类似研究量表得分的相关性则远没有这么好。MDS-行为与PGDRS和BPRS总分之间的Pearson相关性分别为0.54和0.51,MDS-情绪与BPRS因子1(抑郁)和DMAS 1-17小计(情绪障碍)得分之间的相关性分别为0.20和0.20。
这项对小样本的初步研究表明,所分析的五个MDS+组件中的三个与类似研究评定量表之间存在显著一致性,并证实行为和情绪难以用简单工具进行评估。