• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

最小数据集加项(MDS+)评分与五个评定量表的评分比较。

Minimum Data Set Plus (MDS+) scores compared with scores from five rating scales.

作者信息

Frederiksen K, Tariot P, De Jonghe E

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Unversity of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996 Mar;44(3):305-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb00920.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb00920.x
PMID:8600202
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare mandated Minimum Data Set Plus (MDS+) ratings of behavior, function, mood, communication, and cognition to ratings of these domains using analogous research instruments.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional correlational study of criterion-related validity.

SETTING

Three nursing homes in Rochester, New York.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-two nursing home residents.

MEASUREMENTS

Nursing home staff completed the MDS+ for each subject. Research scales were completed by trained research clinicians, independently of and blinded to the MDS+ results, using the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Dementia Mood Assessment Scale (DMAS), Psychogeriatric Dependency Rating Scale (PGDRS), and Physical Signs and Symptoms Scale (PSMS).

RESULTS

MDS+ measures of functional status, cognitive impairment, and communication were highly correlated with comparable research rating scale scores. Pearson correlation between MDS-functional status and PSMS scores was 0.89, between MDS-dementia and BPRS Factor 3 (representing cognitive dysfunction) and MMSE scores was 0.85 and 0.77, respectively, and between MDS-communication and MMSE and PGDRS Item 6 (assessing communication) scores was 0.74 and 0.62, respectively. Behavior and mood scores did not correlate nearly as well with comparable research scale scores. Pearson correlation between MDS- behavior and PGDRS and BPRS total scores was 0.54 and 0.51, respectively , and between MDS-mood and BPRS Factor 1 (depression) and DMAS 1-17 subtotal (mood disturbance) scores was 0.20 and 0.20, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This preliminary study in a small sample shows marked agreement between three of the five MDS+ components analyzed and comparable research rating scales and confirms that behavior and mood are difficult to assess with simple instruments.

摘要

目的

比较强制使用的最小数据集增强版(MDS+)在行为、功能、情绪、沟通和认知方面的评分与使用类似研究工具对这些领域的评分。

设计

与标准相关效度的横断面相关性研究。

地点

纽约罗切斯特的三家养老院。

参与者

52名养老院居民。

测量方法

养老院工作人员为每位受试者完成MDS+。研究量表由经过培训的研究临床医生独立于MDS+结果并在对其不知情的情况下完成,使用简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)、简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)、痴呆症情绪评估量表(DMAS)、老年精神科依赖评定量表(PGDRS)和身体体征与症状量表(PSMS)。

结果

MDS+在功能状态、认知障碍和沟通方面的测量结果与类似研究评定量表得分高度相关。MDS-功能状态与PSMS得分之间的Pearson相关性为0.89,MDS-痴呆与BPRS因子3(代表认知功能障碍)和MMSE得分之间的相关性分别为0.85和0.77,MDS-沟通与MMSE和PGDRS项目6(评估沟通)得分之间的相关性分别为0.74和0.62。行为和情绪得分与类似研究量表得分的相关性则远没有这么好。MDS-行为与PGDRS和BPRS总分之间的Pearson相关性分别为0.54和0.51,MDS-情绪与BPRS因子1(抑郁)和DMAS 1-17小计(情绪障碍)得分之间的相关性分别为0.20和0.20。

结论

这项对小样本的初步研究表明,所分析的五个MDS+组件中的三个与类似研究评定量表之间存在显著一致性,并证实行为和情绪难以用简单工具进行评估。

相似文献

1
Minimum Data Set Plus (MDS+) scores compared with scores from five rating scales.最小数据集加项(MDS+)评分与五个评定量表的评分比较。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996 Mar;44(3):305-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb00920.x.
2
The validity of the minimum data set in measuring the cognitive impairment of persons admitted to nursing homes.最小数据集在测量养老院入住者认知障碍方面的有效性。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 Dec;48(12):1601-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03870.x.
3
Validity and responsiveness of the Minimum Data Set.最小数据集的效度和反应性。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999 Aug;47(8):1000-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb01297.x.
4
The MDS Cognition Scale: a valid instrument for identifying and staging nursing home residents with dementia using the minimum data set.MDS认知量表:一种使用最小数据集识别和分期痴呆症疗养院居民的有效工具。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994 Nov;42(11):1173-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb06984.x.
5
[Three new observational scales for use in Dutch nursing homes: scales from the Resident Assessment Instrument for Activities of Daily Living, cognition and depression].[荷兰养老院使用的三种新观察量表:日常生活活动能力、认知和抑郁的居民评估工具量表]
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2004 Apr;35(2):55-64.
6
MDS 3.0: brief interview for mental status.MDS 3.0:简要精神状态访谈。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012 Sep;13(7):611-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jul 15.
7
Minimum data set for home care: a valid instrument to assess frail older people living in the community.居家护理最低数据集:评估社区中体弱老年人的有效工具。
Med Care. 2000 Dec;38(12):1184-90. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200012000-00005.
8
Decision-making capacity to execute a health care proxy: development and testing of guidelines.执行医疗保健代理人的决策能力:指南的制定与测试
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 Feb;48(2):179-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03909.x.
9
Validation of the Minimum Data Set Cognitive Performance Scale: agreement with the Mini-Mental State Examination.最小数据集认知功能量表的验证:与简易精神状态检查表的一致性
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995 Mar;50(2):M128-33. doi: 10.1093/gerona/50a.2.m128.
10
Psychometric characteristics of the minimum data set II: validity.最小数据集II的心理测量学特征:效度
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998 Jun;46(6):736-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb03809.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinician Volume and Outcomes Among Patients Admitted to Nursing Homes for Postacute Care.入住疗养院接受急性后护理患者的临床医生工作量与治疗结果
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2527234. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.27234.
2
Dementia Moves: protocol for a feasibility study testing a physical rehabilitation program for long-term care residents with moderate to severe dementia.痴呆症运动:一项可行性研究的方案,该研究测试针对中重度痴呆症长期护理居民的身体康复计划。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 Jul 26;11(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s40814-025-01685-7.
3
Behavioral and Cognitive Problems as Determinants of Malnutrition in Long-Term Care Facilities, a Cross-Sectional and Prospective Study.
行为和认知问题是长期护理机构营养不良的决定因素:一项横断面和前瞻性研究。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2022;26(8):749-759. doi: 10.1007/s12603-022-1827-3.
4
Factors associated with anticholinergic burden among older patients in long-term care hospitals in Korea.韩国长期护理医院老年患者抗胆碱能负担的相关因素。
Korean J Intern Med. 2022 Mar;37(2):468-477. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2021.457. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
5
Prevalence of cognitive impairment among long-term care residents: a comparison between nursing homes and residential homes in Poland.波兰长期护理机构居民认知障碍的患病率:疗养院与养老院的比较。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2018 Aug;9(4):467-476. doi: 10.1007/s41999-018-0062-2. Epub 2018 May 16.
6
Performance of the Cognitive Performance Scale of the Resident Assessment Instrument (interRAI) for Detecting Dementia amongst Older Adults in the Community.认知表现量表在评估工具(interRAI)对社区老年人痴呆症检测的表现。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 22;18(13):6708. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136708.
7
The prevalence and prescribing patterns of benzodiazepines and Z-drugs in older nursing home residents in different European countries and Israel: retrospective results from the EU SHELTER study.不同欧洲国家和以色列老年疗养院居民中苯二氮䓬类药物和 Z 类药物的流行情况和处方模式:来自欧盟 SHELTER 研究的回顾性结果。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Apr 26;21(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02213-x.
8
Impact of COVID-19-Related Lockdown on Psychosocial, Cognitive, and Functional Well-Being in Adults With Down Syndrome.2019冠状病毒病相关封锁对唐氏综合征成年人心理社会、认知及功能健康的影响
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 28;11:578686. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.578686. eCollection 2020.
9
Comparing the case-mix of frail older people at home and of those being admitted into residential care: a longitudinal study.比较居家体弱老年人和入住养老院老年人的病例组合:一项纵向研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01593-w.
10
Development and Testing of the interRAI Acute Care: A Standardized Assessment Administered by Nurses for Patients Admitted to Acute Care.interRAI急性护理评估工具的开发与测试:一种由护士对急性护理入院患者进行的标准化评估。
Health Serv Insights. 2018 Dec 17;11:1178632918818836. doi: 10.1177/1178632918818836. eCollection 2018.