Pratt M, McDonald S, Libbey P, Oberle M, Liang A
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 4770 Buford Highway, Atlanta, GA 30341- 3724, USA.
Public Health Rep. 1996 Jan-Feb;111(1):87-91.
THE ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL for EXCELLENCE in PUBLIC HEALTH process was carried out in the state of Washington to assess local health department capacity and to identify their self-perceived strengths and weaknesses. Staff from 24 of the 32 local health departments in Washington completed organizational capacity assessments. Fifty percent or more of the health departments identified the following eight indicators as strengths: legal authority, public policy and implementation, budget development, financial reporting and administration, audit, financial documentation, organization and structure of program management, and policy board procedures. Seven indicators were identified as weaknesses by 50% or more of the respondents: legal counsel, mission and role, data collection and analysis, planning and development, evaluation and assurance of community health assessment, community health assessment and planning, and community health policy. The results of the assessment highlight the traditional organizational and service delivery strengths of the local health departments and point out weaknesses in their ability to assess community health and to develop communitywide health policy.
华盛顿州实施了公共卫生卓越评估协议,以评估当地卫生部门的能力,并确定其自我认知的优势和劣势。华盛顿州32个地方卫生部门中的24个部门的工作人员完成了组织能力评估。50% 或更多的卫生部门将以下八项指标视为优势:法律权威、公共政策与实施、预算制定、财务报告与管理、审计、财务文件、项目管理的组织与结构以及政策委员会程序。50% 或更多的受访者将七项指标视为劣势:法律顾问、使命与角色、数据收集与分析、规划与发展、社区健康评估的评估与保障、社区健康评估与规划以及社区健康政策。评估结果突出了地方卫生部门传统的组织和服务提供优势,并指出了它们在评估社区健康和制定全社区健康政策方面的劣势。