Davenport R J, Dennis M S, Warlow C P
University of Edinburgh, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Stroke. 1996 Mar;27(3):421-4. doi: 10.1161/01.str.27.3.421.
Although patients with critical illness or acute head injury are known to be at risk of gastrointestinal hemorrhage, there is little information concerning acute stroke. We sought to record the frequency, possible causes, and course of gastrointestinal hemorrhage in a cohort of hospitalized stroke patients.
During a 36-month period we prospectively identified 613 strokes (excluding subarachnoid hemorrhage). We then retrieved the case notes, and a single observer reviewed all available records (n=607), noting any episodes of gastrointestinal hemorrhage together with details concerning the course, possible precipitating+ factors, management, and outcome.
Eighteen patients (3%) experienced a gastrointestinal hemorrhage, half of which were severe. These patients were older and had suffered more severe strokes than those without any gastrointestinal bleeding. The source was identified in 5 patients; 2 had gastric ulceration, 2 duodenal ulceration, and the remaining one had esophageal/duodenal ulceration. In 17 patients, there was a potential risk factor for hemorrhage, although the odds ratios comparing the use of antithrombotic drugs in the hemorrhage and nonhemorrhage groups did not achieve statistical significance. Death during the acute admission period was more common in the 18 hemorrhage patients (odds ratio, 4.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.7 to 13.2; two-tailed P=.002, Fisher's exact test); of the 10 who died, gastrointestinal hemorrhage appeared to have been a contributing factor in 3.
Our study provides a reasonably accurate estimate of the frequency of gastrointestinal hemorrhage after acute stroke. The higher frequency found in our study than the previously published data is probably due to study methodology. Older patients with more severe strokes may be at increased risk of this complication, and it may adversely affect outcome.
尽管已知危重病患者或急性颅脑损伤患者有发生胃肠道出血的风险,但关于急性卒中患者的相关信息却很少。我们试图记录一组住院卒中患者胃肠道出血的发生率、可能病因及病程。
在36个月的时间里,我们前瞻性地确定了613例卒中患者(不包括蛛网膜下腔出血)。然后我们检索了病历,由一名观察者查阅了所有可用记录(n = 607),记录任何胃肠道出血事件以及有关病程、可能的促发因素、治疗及结局的详细信息。
18例患者(3%)发生了胃肠道出血,其中一半为严重出血。这些患者比未发生任何胃肠道出血的患者年龄更大,卒中病情更严重。5例患者明确了出血源;2例为胃溃疡,2例为十二指肠溃疡,其余1例为食管/十二指肠溃疡。17例患者存在出血的潜在危险因素,尽管出血组与未出血组使用抗血栓药物的比值比未达到统计学显著性。急性住院期间死亡在18例出血患者中更为常见(比值比,4.6;95%置信区间,1.7至13.2;双侧P = 0.002,Fisher精确检验);在死亡的10例患者中,胃肠道出血似乎是3例的促成因素。
我们的研究对急性卒中后胃肠道出血的发生率提供了较为准确的估计。我们研究中发现的较高发生率可能归因于研究方法。年龄较大、卒中病情较严重的患者发生这种并发症的风险可能增加,且可能对结局产生不利影响。